, January 27, 2011 2:05 AM
To: rich...@karlquist.com; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Update -- Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz
For close in phase noise, the kind that is usually of interest, and hardest
to measure, it does work in general
Thanks to some help from Joe Ruggieri, I finally managed to get a pair of
10.000 GHz microwave brick oscillators phase-locked to 100 MHz inputs.
These require an input of about 0 dBm at 100 MHz and have an output of about
+ 13 dBm at 10 GHz. To gauge whether or not loop noise would
brucekar...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks to some help from Joe Ruggieri, I finally managed to get a pair of
10.000 GHz microwave brick oscillators phase-locked to 100 MHz inputs.
This experiment seems to confirm the earlier results by Ulrich Bangert and
his friend that noise does not appear to be a
Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of brucekar...@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:21 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Update -- Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz
Thanks to some help from Joe Ruggieri, I finally
27, 2011 3:38 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Update -- Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz
brucekar...@aol.com wrote:
...The bricks are extremely low noise
in their own right and are locked with a narrow loop that prevents
source noise
