.. at least the original post was about time/frequency rather than mail
programs and headers ..
David
--
SatSignal software - quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk
___
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:34:57 -0800
gary li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
The following is a few ntpq -p outputs. Just random samples over a week.
I seem to periodically have large offset.
I'm open to suggest how to improve this if the numbers don't look normal.
Please trim the raw data to
I don't see how the thread was hijacked. I hit reply, but cleared the
subject line and text in the original message.
No other forums have issues with this.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
On Thunderbird, it looks like a fresh thread.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
li...@lazygranch.com said:
I don't see how the thread was hijacked. I hit reply, but cleared the
subject line and text in the original message.
You didn't cleanup the headers. Your message contained:
References: cabbxvhtj3b3kbzshesqqzca_do8fak2fxnam4foekttokfw...@mail.gmail.co
m
of
[time-nuts] HP5328A LEDS driver transistor which now also includes
Re: [time-nuts] hijacking threads messages.
If it looks like a fresh thread to you in your Thunderbird, I can only
assume you must have turned off threading in your view of the mail list
window
...@febo.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:20:09
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] hijacking threads
On 1/23/2012 1:04 AM, gary wrote:
On Thunderbird
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:02:50 -0800
gary li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
I don't see how the thread was hijacked. I hit reply, but cleared the
subject line and text in the original message.
No other forums have issues with this.
The issue is, that the header, which records the history of a mail
On 1/23/2012 4:41 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
You didn't cleanup the headers. Your message contained:
References:cabbxvhtj3b3kbzshesqqzca_do8fak2fxnam4foekttokfw...@mail.gmail.co
That's not really his fault. Thunderbird does it wrong. RFC 1036:
2.2.5. References - This field lists the
I don't think it is clear that editing the Subject line is the same as
raising a new subject. There are a bunch of reasons why you might want
to edit a subject line on a thread without starting a new thread: Removing
offensive material, fixing a spelling error, adding an OT:, or other label
to a
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:58:38 -0500
Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:
Let's not blame the email program when the problem is really operator error.
I actually dont blame neither the operator nor the mail program.
It's an issue in how features of the technology you use are exposed
to the
Well, I just got out of the shower and had this thought:
There are people who hijack a thread *without* changing the Subject.
Tension is caused by noble goals meeting human imperfection. So it goes.
Oh, look at the time! Gotta run . . .
Bill Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: Attila
On 1/23/12 6:58 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:
I don't think it is clear that editing the Subject line is the same as
raising a new subject. There are a bunch of reasons why you might want
to edit a subject line on a thread without starting a new thread: Removing
offensive material, fixing a spelling
On 1/23/2012 9:58 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:
I don't think it is clear that editing the Subject line is the same as
raising a new subject.
In the context of the References header, as was being discussed in the
RFC, that's all it _can_ be (editing the subject line). When creating a
message from
14 matches
Mail list logo
