Don't touch it. If you do you become responsible, in your neighbor's eyes,
for any and all subsequent failures.
Regards.
Max. K 4 O DS.
- Original Message -
From: ed breya e...@telight.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts
A signal like that coming from a dish makes some sense to me. I
vaguely recall from about ten years ago investigating how the
satellite receivers work, that a fairly strong control signal of
around 20 kHz was used in some to select the various LNBs and their
polarizations in more complicated
Brook's suggestion to shut off your house power is an excellent one; however,
your neighbors could be involved, too. A portable transistor radio tuned to
the low end of the band where there is no station would make a good electrical
noise detector -- assuming the mystery signal has harmonics,
Hi Ed:
The DISEqC protocol is a low level signal at 22 kHz which would not make the
signal being discussed.
If it was me I wouldn't look to the neighbor until I was sure it was not coming from my house, hence the shut down the
house first approach.
It's very difficult to generate any signal
I was thinking of a new alternative we may have not considered.
Absolutely near field.
The solar panels popping up on the roofs then hitting an inverter sync'ed
to 60 Hz X 1000 would be a mighty fine transmitter. I know in our area
numbers of homes now have them on the roofs.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
Joe,
On 11/14/2014 03:56 AM, Joe Leikhim wrote:
Looks like a clock to divide by 1000 and generate 59.99 Hz
A computer video card or monitor?
Some piece of Video gear?
You would have 60/1.001 in that case. This is more 60/1.000124 or so.
Someone tries to do 60 kHz but is 125 ppm south.
A
Hi
It could easily be a switcher in somebody’s video gear. Keeping the power
supply in sync with the video may / may not be a good idea. Some people do it
that way.
Bob
On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Doug Ronald d...@dougronald.com wrote:
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am
In message 0b078d42-2bf0-48ae-a6e6-2399ff308...@n1k.org, Bob Camp writes:
Hi
It could easily be a switcher in somebody’s video gear. Keeping
the power supply in sync with the video may / may not be a good
idea. Some people do it that way.
Vertical retrace in NTSC ?
at a frequency of
On 11/14/14, 4:28 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
The question kind of is: Is it really supposed to be 60kHz and slightly
off frequency? Or is it deliberately at that frequency because it's a
multiple/submultimple of something useful?
It could easily be a switcher in somebody’s video gear.
OK everyone. I am sorry I left my 60 Khz transmitter on in Boston. Good to
see its getting out to California. The antenna is a 90 foot tower.
I figured since the d-psk-r's been a long experiment I would just replace
wwvb with a constant phase no modulation Cs driven signal. Why fix the
problem?
Whatever the source for that signal, it may explain why all our wwvb clocks
have had receiving troubles over the last weeks syncing up here in NV...
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 14, 2014, at 6:10, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
OK everyone. I am sorry I left my 60 Khz transmitter on in
with wood group send a blank email to
funwithwood-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
- Original Message -
From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange carrier
Hi
-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
- Original Message - From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange carrier
Hi
It could easily be a switcher in somebody’s
OK, its a mystery, and will be until its properties are known.
We have instrument capable of measuring those properties, but so far
we've had the typical exchange of ignorance so often found on the 'net.
Clever ignorance, but still not useful.
Is Said Jackson the only other person seeing
...
-Doug, W6DSR
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Doug Ronald
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:23 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] strange carrier
Importance: Low
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am receiving a carrier
@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] strange carrier
Importance: Low
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am receiving a carrier, 10 dB
stronger than WWVB in Sunnyvale, California, quite stable, on the air 24/7
at a frequency of 59.99240 kHz. I have researched on Internet what it might
I'm pretty sure that there is nothing the in the neighbor's satellite
receiver that is allowed to interfere with licensed services, such as
WWVB. More usually, they contain a label, that says they must not cause
any interference, and must suffer all interference.
Reduce your loop to something
arrived today, so I'm super-anxious
to get a decent signal...
-Doug, W6DSR
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Doug Ronald
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:23 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] strange carrier
Importance: Low
I'm
send a blank email to
funwithwood-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
- Original Message -
From: Bill Hawkins b...@iaxs.net
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange carrier
OK, its
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am receiving a carrier, 10 dB
stronger than WWVB in Sunnyvale, California, quite stable, on the air 24/7
at a frequency of 59.99240 kHz. I have researched on Internet what it might
be, with no results. I have turned off all switch mode power supplies at my
Doug
A classical tv anyplace? 4th harmonic of the flyback was a common issue.
My best guess and highly doubtful.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Doug Ronald d...@dougronald.com wrote:
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am receiving a carrier, 10 dB
stronger than WWVB
Maybe it's leakage from another time-nut's experiment in the
neighborhood, or some commercial equipment. There's probably lots of
stuff going on in that area. It's not necessarily a broadcast
carrier, but just a frequency that happens to be generated somewhere
and getting out big enough -
7.6 Hz is very close to the Schumann resonance fundamental.
Don
Doug Ronald
I'm working on my WWVB BPSK receiver and am receiving a carrier, 10 dB
stronger than WWVB in Sunnyvale, California, quite stable, on the air 24/7
at a frequency of 59.99240 kHz. I have researched on Internet what it
Looks like a clock to divide by 1000 and generate 59.99 Hz
A computer video card or monitor?
Some piece of Video gear?
A UPS?
A solar system power inverter?
A generator control panel?
--
Joe Leikhim
Leikhim and Associates
Communications Consultants
Oviedo, Florida
jleik...@leikhim.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
