My recent attempts at posting have been all been blocked for some reason so I
am switching email address in the hope that that corrects it.
Here is my last one, hoping that it is not a repeat for you guys.
Hi,
I have just brought my PRS10 out of mothballs and am trying to get a good
lock to
Hi Mike,
your msg is on the list.
Rgds Ernie.
-Original Message-
From: mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 12:14 pm
Subject: [time-nuts] test after email address change and repost of PRS10
My recent attempts at posting have been all been blocked for some
reason so I am switching email address in the hope that that corrects it.
Here is my last one, hoping that it is not a repeat for you guys.
Hi,
I have just brought my PRS10 out of mothballs and am trying to
get a good
Time-nuts isn't yahoo. It is something that John Ackermann
put together called febo.com. Febo is one of John's cats.
Most probably, the OP's email program is set to not display
emails which appear to originate from his address...
-Chuck Harris
Chris Wilson wrote:
My recent attempts at
Mike,
I just measured my FS725 (a PRS10 in a box). The nearest scope was an
analog with only 100MHz bandwidth. The PPS risetime was about 5.5ns.The
usual analog scope risetime is 0.35/bandwidth so that puts scope risetime
around 3.5ns. Whatever the PPS risetime really is, it's an order of
Jarl Risum gave me some info which could explain that. His PRS10 1PPS rise time
, taken at the unit DB connector pin, was about 50ns, which is in the same
ballpark as mine, but he noted that if the Breaklout Board is installed , the
signal passes through a two Schmitt inverters (74HC14s).
Just wanted to say that Gmail has been agonizing lately with their
improvements in that sort of stuff.
Hats off to John. He keeps the digital home fires lit.
Norm n3ykf
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:
Time-nuts isn't yahoo. It is something that John
