Re: [time-nuts] thoughts on lightning arrestors

2014-11-28 Thread Chris Albertson
Lightening arresters don't have to handle that much energy. When a strike hits a mast with an antenna on it the current divides. Most of it should go straight down the tower or mast into the ground. This is why the structure is bonded to a grounding system using a straight line path with ground

Re: [time-nuts] thoughts on lightning arrestors

2014-11-28 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Any form of protection (no matter what you are protecting against) is part of a system. The more complex the system, the more it costs and the larger it gets. The more details you cover in your system the more 9’s you get to put in the “99.9xxx% protection” statement. Is there an event out

Re: [time-nuts] thoughts on lightning arrestors

2014-11-28 Thread Alberto di Bene
On 11/28/2014 6:57 PM, Bob Camp wrote: /A mountain top (or skyscraper top) communications setup can be designed to// //take multiple direct lightning hits an hour and keep right on going and do// //it for may years. There are//*lots*// of systems out there like that./ Last April 25 there was

[time-nuts] thoughts on lightning arrestors

2014-11-27 Thread Bill Hawkins
Two of nature's great forces are hurricanes and thunderstorms. A cloud with dimensions measured in miles can accumulate a great deal of static charge during a storm, thousands of times more than any human-built accumulator. When the volts/meter between the cloud and the ground become high enough,

[time-nuts] thoughts on lightning arrestors

2014-11-27 Thread Mark Sims
Bark effect? ;-) Lightning hit a tree behind where I lived and three other trees near it also exploded... you ain't gonna arrest a direct lightning strike. --- Skin effect did not save the tree.