Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-24 Thread Tom Van Baak
HI A died in the wool Time Nut who doesn't care what time it is - what's the world coming to Bob Hi Bob, I think you mean dyed in the wool. A *died* in the wool time nut could be used to describe a frozen 19th century sextant and sidereal pendulum clock carrying Antarctic

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-16 Thread Dan Kemppainen
More importantly, how many things don't really need a clock to begin with! :) Every piece of equipment in our house shows a different time. I wouldn't complain if they all automatically adjusted. My current solution is to just stop looking at the clocks, and it's amazing how much easier life

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-16 Thread J. Forster
More importantly, how many things don't really need a clock to begin with! :) ABSOLUTELY! If you turn on the coffee maker when you walk int the kitchen, it'll be done by the time you fix breakfast. And so on... A clock on almost everything is totally superfluous, IMO. Things that do need to

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-16 Thread Al Wolfe
Confucius say: Man with two clocks never know what time it is. Al Every piece of equipment in our house shows a different time. I wouldn't complain if they all automatically adjusted. My current solution is to just stop looking at the clocks, and it's amazing how much easier life gets if

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-16 Thread Bob Camp
HI A died in the wool Time Nut who doesn't care what time it is - what's the world coming to Bob On Jul 16, 2012, at 9:34 AM, J. Forster wrote: More importantly, how many things don't really need a clock to begin with! :) ABSOLUTELY! If you turn on the coffee maker when you walk

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-16 Thread J. Forster
Just because I like Brie, doesn't mean I like French Bread or wine. I am interested in Standards of Time Interval for engineering purposes. I havn't looked at my oven clock in probably 25 years. I presume it's accurate twice a day or somewhere on earth, but I couldn't care less. IMO, adding a

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan.. PS

2012-07-16 Thread J. Forster
PS: 30 odd years ago, I bought a toaster for about $20 that worked fine and made good toast until recently. It only failed because a piece of bread got jammed and was impossible to clean. So, I bought a new toaster, for about the same price. It didn't last 30 weeks. In my view, this is NOT

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan.. PS

2012-07-16 Thread Jean-Louis Oneto
I just hope it didn't died on the last leapsecond...? On 16/07/2012 22:50, J. Forster wrote: PS: 30 odd years ago, I bought a toaster for about $20 that worked fine and made good toast until recently. It only failed because a piece of bread got jammed and was impossible to clean. So, I bought

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-14 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 07/14/2012 06:47 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: The key thing GPS is lacking is Daylight Savings Time. WWV WWVB have the DST bits that allow a clock to show the local time. One reason GPS doesn't have it is that it is not coordinated globally. For instance, US is not shifting DST at the

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-14 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I think the answer to how many places would it be used is to simply count the number of things that have the wrong time on them each time the power burps. There are maybe a dozen gizmos like that in this room (yes I'm in the kitchen). Bob On Jul 14, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Hal Murray wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-14 Thread J. Forster
I don't see why school crossing signs, water sprinklers, street or outdoor lighting need 1 second timing. Ten minutes, or a photocell, would be more than adequate. Synchronized traffic lights, perhaps. But there are other cheaper, ways of doing that like a simple radio link. -John

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-14 Thread David I. Emery
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 06:15:14AM -0700, J. Forster wrote: I don't see why school crossing signs, water sprinklers, street or outdoor lighting need 1 second timing. Ten minutes, or a photocell, would be more than adequate. While there are many many other applications, the issue for

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread David I. Emery
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:48:52PM -0400, paul swed wrote: David Read your comments and have been traveling. So finally a chance to email. I read the document also and walked away with what I shared. In your reading would you believe the following. Its an absolute phase and that when it

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 07/14/2012 01:49 AM, David I. Emery wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:48:52PM -0400, paul swed wrote: David Read your comments and have been traveling. So finally a chance to email. I read the document also and walked away with what I shared. In your reading would you believe the

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread David I. Emery
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 02:38:34AM +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote: I think the PTTI article isn't as much documentation as presentation of general principle, showing details more as to present how it can be done, but not necessarily guarantee it will be done that way. Knowing the

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread Hal Murray
d...@dieconsulting.com said: There are innumerable applications for low cost low power human level 1 second accurate time of day in modern electronic systems - examples are traffic lights and school crossing signs and water sprinklers and street lights and other outdoor lighting and many

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: The key thing GPS is lacking is Daylight Savings Time. WWV WWVB have the DST bits that allow a clock to show the local time. Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html ___ time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread David I. Emery
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:47:12PM -0700, Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: The key thing GPS is lacking is Daylight Savings Time. WWV WWVB have the DST bits that allow a clock to show the local time. And that is important for most routine civil human use. Nor something that could

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-13 Thread Ron Ward
[mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of David I. Emery Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 8:35 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 02:38:34AM +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote: I think

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-11 Thread paul
David Read your comments and have been traveling. So finally a chance to email. I read the document also and walked away with what I shared. In your reading would you believe the following. Its an absolute phase and that when it switches to 0 there is 1 transition at the beginning of the second

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-11 Thread paul swed
David Read your comments and have been traveling. So finally a chance to email. I read the document also and walked away with what I shared. In your reading would you believe the following. Its an absolute phase and that when it switches to 0 there is 1 transition at the beginning of the second

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-09 Thread J. Forster
There is an advantage to BPSK switching at the zero crossings in that the spectrum is significantly narrowed. -John == Could not the phase modulation be made +/-90 degrees, with the appropriate number of stuff bits being added so that the average phase remains constant? Would

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-09 Thread Bob Camp
HI My assumption is that for what we would be doing, one lock is all it's going to take. The local clock will be good enough to allow you to never need to re-aquire. You will indeed steer to maintain phase, but you already have and know what's coming in on the modulation. Bob On Jul 8,

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-09 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 07/09/2012 03:32 AM, Bob Camp wrote: HI My assumption is that for what we would be doing, one lock is all it's going to take. The local clock will be good enough to allow you to never need to re-aquire. You will indeed steer to maintain phase, but you already have and know what's coming

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-09 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Leap seconds may never happen if PHK gets things organized … :)… Cycle slips are the main thing you would be watching for. The slow steer to maintain synch is to catch or correct cycle slips. Bob On Jul 9, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: On 07/09/2012 03:32 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread paul
Ei Sorry if I have your name reversed. By taking this approach it eliminates the ability to use wwvb as a frequency reference because it destroys that traceability. Thats what we are trying to preserve. Or at least re-establish for the older phase measuring receivers. Regards Paul On

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Any possibility of using the decoded signal to un-do the modulation and feed the reconstituted signal to the older receiver? On 7/8/2012 12:56 PM, paul wrote: Ei Sorry if I have your name reversed. By taking this approach it eliminates the ability to use wwvb as a frequency reference

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread paul
Peter indeed there could be But it should not need to be decoded to undo the psk. Plus documentation lacks some of the details I think to actually do it. But that would be a significant project since the formats not been settled completely yet. Regards Paul. On 7/8/2012 6:40 PM, Peter

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread J. Forster
Hi Peter, That's be the hard way, but yes, if the message BPSK coded is computable and of a known format. If the message contained more than time, like solar flux, it gets more complicated very rapidly. A similar thing was done with the Equatorial system 30+ years ago. In that case, each data

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Bob Camp
Hi In this case the data format and it's contents are highly computable. If you have a good local clock *and* an initial lock, the rest of what follows is predictable. That of course assumes we know the real format …. Bob On Jul 8, 2012, at 6:58 PM, J. Forster wrote: Hi Peter, That's be

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread J. Forster
A risky assumption, and a cold start could be tricky. Equatorial took many minutes to lock up, with a much higher data rate, and it did it by slowly sweeping the local clock. Aside: That's why military spread spectrum systems like good local clocks. They lock up a whole lot faster that way.

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 07/09/2012 12:46 AM, paul wrote: Peter indeed there could be But it should not need to be decoded to undo the psk. Plus documentation lacks some of the details I think to actually do it. But that would be a significant project since the formats not been settled completely yet. I have

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Tofurk Ei
Ei Sorry if I have your name reversed. By taking this approach it eliminates the ability to use wwvb as a frequency reference because it destroys that traceability. Thats what we are trying to preserve. Or at least re-establish for the older phase measuring receivers. Regards Paul Are you getting

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The clocks we would be using are *much* better than what most military systems use…. I also *assume* that an initial lock up that takes a hour is perfectly acceptable in this application. You will still need a lot of hours / days / what ever of data to get useful stability off of WWVB,

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The gotcha is that they may change the sync word based on test data. They may also tweak other vague points in the spec based on the troubles they run into in their tests or with their silicon. Bob On Jul 8, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: On 07/09/2012 12:46 AM, paul wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread J. Forster
If you have a deep fade every few hours or minutes, as is common, relock time becomes an issue. -John == Hi The clocks we would be using are *much* better than what most military systems use…. I also *assume* that an initial lock up that takes a hour is perfectly acceptable

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread J. Forster
There is not an infinity of good sync words. A typical good sync word has a high positive autocorrelation when synced, sloping downwards monotonically. Thus the cross-correlation of the received word with a locally stored reference can be used to steer the loop using a small dither and a lock-in

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread David J Taylor
Could not the phase modulation be made +/-90 degrees, with the appropriate number of stuff bits being added so that the average phase remains constant? Would the older receivers simply average out the phase variation over a longer period? David GM8ARV -- SatSignal Software - Quality software

Re: [time-nuts] Phase modulation detection/NIST plan

2012-07-08 Thread David I. Emery
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 09:02:53PM -0400, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that they may change the sync word based on test data. They may also tweak other vague points in the spec based on the troubles they run into in their tests or with their silicon. I finally read the