Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Robert Atkinson
Hi Ken, This is correct. Some other documents explain the rationale. Basically for long runs the loss caused by the mismatch is less than the higher loss per foot of 50R coax of a similar size. Even better than RG59 is the high performance cable used for cable TV and satellite installations.

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Hal Murray
kenkub...@hotmail.com said: Hi Time-Nuts guys, I was reading the Trimble Thunderbolt manual section 2.1.3 (Antenna Cable). Trimble recommends using RG-59 cable which is 75 ohm coax. Is this a typo or is this correct? I thought that the Trimble Thunderbolt would use a 50 ohm cable and

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread bg
Hi Ken, Hi Time-Nuts guys, I was reading the Trimble Thunderbolt manual section 2.1.3 (Antenna Cable). Trimble recommends using RG-59 cable which is 75 ohm coax. Is this a typo or is this correct? I thought that the Trimble Thunderbolt would use a 50 ohm cable and antenna. Thankyou

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Low noise receiver inputs are often mismatched to optimize noise figure. Receiving antennas may / may not be well matched to a given impedance. That all makes the mismatch loss a bit of a random thing. Some of the early Trimble docs mention that they saw essentially no mismatch loss when

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread paul swed
Its all been said above. Now I use zero loss ;-) 1/2 catv hardline 2 Ghz stuff. Regards Paul On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: Hi Low noise receiver inputs are often mismatched to optimize noise figure. Receiving antennas may / may not be well matched to a given

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Don Latham
My TrueTime gps rcvr uses rg-59 as well. Don Robert Atkinson Hi Ken, This is correct. Some other documents explain the rationale. Basically for long runs the loss caused by the mismatch is less than the higher loss per foot of 50R coax of a similar size. Even better than RG59 is the high

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, I use the regular satellite TV cable: low loss, easy to find and cheap. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote: My TrueTime gps rcvr uses rg-59 as well. Don Robert Atkinson Hi Ken, This is correct. Some other documents explain the rationale. Basically

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread SAIDJACK
Make sure to buy the quadrouple shielded 75 Ohms RG-6 cable from Home Depot etc, it's much better than the standard single or double shielded RG-6 and works wonders for GPS signals, and it's quite inexpensive. Impedance mismatch loss can be neglected, and long cable runs can be made. bye,

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble recommends RG-59 Antenna Cable.

2012-04-30 Thread Eric Lemmon
Ken, I believe that the manual also states that RG-59 has lower loss than RG-58, but I would use RG-6 for even lower loss. Neither the antenna nor the Thunderbolt cares much about the cable impedance. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com