On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:35:07 -0400, Mike S wrote:
At 05:07 PM 10/12/2009, J. Forster wrote...
Thankfully, the enlightened use:...
mage
The enlightened play WoW?
I am sure 'mage' should be read as 'mega' !
I guess a mere typing error [or an intelligence test ;-) ?] !
Arnold
In message 286f7bad0910130703v6680affbx95905a440...@mail.gmail.com, David
Kirkby writes:
I've asked this on comp.unix.shell, but never got a 100% satsifactory
answer. Perhaps someone here might know.
Does anyone know how to get the number of seconds since 1/1/1970 on a
Unix system using the
John,
i don't understand mage, my dictionnary no more
is it some slangy expression?
salut de France!
Alain
F4GBC
- Original Message -
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:07 PM
Magician, sorcerer, wizard, warlock, enchanter or similar.
David
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of AL1
Sent: 13 October 2009 17:01
To: j...@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re:
I gather from your referenced web page that it seems that a
higher damping number was better. Is this a correct assumption ?
Well Not exactly, It depends on the type and source of the noise error.
The simple answer is that the default damping setting of 1.2 on the Tbolt
is a good compromise
Alain,
think magic, c'est magique...!
Arnold
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:01:08 +0200, AL1 wrote:
John,
i don't understand mage, my dictionnary no more
is it some slangy expression?
salut de France!
Alain
F4GBC
- Original Message -
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
To: Discussion of precise
mega? mis-typed
At 12:13 PM 10/13/2009, you wrote:
Magician, sorcerer, wizard, warlock, enchanter or similar.
David
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of AL1
Sent: 13 October 2009 17:01
To: j...@quik.com; Discussion of
Check in a French dictionnary... that may helps!
Salut de Grasse (France)!
- Original Message -
From: AL1 alain2.bouc...@wanadoo.fr
To: j...@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:01 PM
Subject: Re:
Hello,
I'd very much appreciate any help that I can get in setting up a HP5328B to
communicate over GPIB.
The goal is to log/graph the frequency over time of various VFO's projects I'm
working on.
I am using the Agilent 82357A USB to GPIB Interface, I have the manual for the
counter, so I
I present detailed experiences of building two different GPSDOs, which
were built from designs with available PC boards. Visit my pages at:
www.moorepage.net
GPS oscillator 1 is Brooks Shera's PLL design. GPS oscillator 2 is
Bertrand Zauhar's FLL design. I have links for lots of stuff in
If you want to get your hands dirty, I'd suggest you to try VE2ZAZ's design.
I've built a few GPSDOs and this one is the one I liked most.
http://ve2zaz.net/GPS_Std/GPS_Std.htm
Roberto
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:30:10 +0100
From: David C. Partridge david.partri...@dsl.pipex.com
Hi,
Depending how deep you want, to go you must
note that this one from ve2zaz (btw which is a great
design given it's simplicity) is a FLL not a PLL.
(unlike most of the others that really lock the phase of the
signal to the 10KHz or 1pps).
Luis Cupido.
ct1dmk.
Roberto Barrios wrote:
Haven't seen this discussed here, but I think it's interesting. Seems
Windows uses local time, whereas MacOSX and Linux, as well as other
OSes use Posix/UTC. There's a discussion about why MS is all wrong on
this, with a possible Win fix using regedit
On a somewhat related note, does anyone have a replacement for the
Windows clock (in the lower right corner of my screen) that displays
fractional MJD ?
At 03:38 PM 10/13/2009, Dick Moore wrote:
Haven't seen this discussed here, but I think it's interesting. Seems
Windows uses local time,
On a somewhat related note, does anyone have a replacement for the
Windows clock (in the lower right corner of my screen) that displays
fractional MJD ?
At 03:38 PM 10/13/2009, Dick Moore wrote:
Haven't seen this discussed here, but I think it's interesting. Seems
Windows uses local time,
To hear an Apple or a UNIX disciple tell it, Microsoft never does anything
right. The fact is, Windows made personal computing bloom.
I bought a Mac and a PC clone w/in a few weeks of each other in the early
90s. The PC clone cost under $2000, the Mac over $5000. The Mac hardware
died at least
Poul-Henning Kamp escribió:
In message 286f7bad0910130703v6680affbx95905a440...@mail.gmail.com, David
Kirkby writes:
I've asked this on comp.unix.shell, but never got a 100% satsifactory
answer. Perhaps someone here might know.
Does anyone know how to get the number of seconds since
Hi John,
What does your fascinating little story have to do with dual-booting clock
troubles?
M$ bashing/hailing can be done off list, IMHO.
--
Björn
To hear an Apple or a UNIX disciple tell it, Microsoft never does anything
right. The fact is, Windows made personal computing bloom.
I
I was responding to a previous post bashing MS which passes for sport
among UNIX, LINUX, and Mac fans:
There's a discussion about why MS is all wrong on this...
They are as annoying, IMO, as people who ring your door bell and try and
convince you of THEIR way to salvation.
-John
==
In message 1869.12.6.201.154.1255464072.squir...@popacctsnew.quik.com, J. Fo
rster writes:
To hear an Apple or a UNIX disciple tell it, Microsoft never does anything
right. The fact is, Windows made personal computing bloom.
They also created at lot of jobs in Seatle.
However, none of this has
2009/10/13 Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk:
In message 286f7bad0910130703v6680affbx95905a440...@mail.gmail.com,
David
Kirkby writes:
I've asked this on comp.unix.shell, but never got a 100% satsifactory
answer. Perhaps someone here might know.
Does anyone know how to get the number
On FreeBSD you can use the strftime facility in date(1):
$ date +%s
1255442977
Poul-Henning
But it does not work on Solaris or HP-UX
I have an old Linux system. The man page for date says:
%s seconds since `00:00:00 1970-01-01 UTC' (a GNU
I'd very much appreciate any help that I can get in setting up a
HP5328B to communicate over GPIB. The goal is to log/graph the
frequency over time of various VFO's projects I'm working on.
I am using the Agilent 82357A USB to GPIB Interface, I have the manual
for the counter, so I know
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 1869.12.6.201.154.1255464072.squir...@popacctsnew.quik.com, J. Fo
rster writes:
To hear an Apple or a UNIX disciple tell it, Microsoft never does anything
right. The fact is, Windows made personal computing bloom.
They also created at lot of jobs in
John, this article wasn't biased toward any OS, nor about
reliability and usefulness -- it is about why Posix/UTC are
extremely important in various applications and what MS is and isn't
doing about it.
I didn't intend to start a Wintel vs anything discussion. I use
Windows and MacOSX,
Hello Jerome,
I use Labview with a NI GPIB card.
There are already data logging modules using the HP5328B for labview.
The code is easily modified and using labview you can debug by single step etc.
Even if you have access to an old ISA bus GPIB card only, you can set up a GPIB
network
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response, It is good to see that there are some solutions.
However ~$1,250 for the Base version of LabView is a bit steep for tinkering in
the garage.
So it sounds like the NI-Visa and the KE5FX gpib toolkit is all I need to get a
graph of the frequencies measured?
You don't need NI-Visa for the GPIB Toolkit, but you do need NI488.2
drivers. You can get NI488.2 support with the Agilent I/O libraries.
You won't, however, be able to use the GPIB Toolkit to graph anything
directly, except for the cases that it already handles. There is a time-
and
If you're not tied to Windows, I've written scripts in Perl under Linux
to get time and frequency data out of several HP counters (though not
the 5382). There is an open-source set of drivers and interface
libraries called linux-gpib that support virtually all GPIB cards and
USB dongles, and
At 09:01 PM 10/13/2009, Jerome Peters wrote...
Thanks for your response, It is good to see that there are some
solutions. However ~$1,250 for the Base version of LabView is a bit
steep for tinkering in the garage.
You can often find IOtech serial-GPIB converters on eBay for well under
$100.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:14:56PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
2009/10/13 Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk:
In message 286f7bad0910130703v6680affbx95905a440...@mail.gmail.com,
David
Kirkby writes:
I've asked this on comp.unix.shell, but never got a 100% satsifactory
answer.
Now if I could only come up with $1500 for Labview, I'd drive my equipment
with it too :-)
Don Latham
- Original Message -
From: Mark C. Stephens ma...@non-stop.com.au
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 5:37 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Getting GPIB to work on HP5382B
32 matches
Mail list logo
