Hi,
This makes sense.
Thanks,
Stephan.
On 8 March 2011 21:08, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote:
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Hi,
I recently noticed something interesting: The DMTD measurement gives a set
of phase values x(t). From which fractional frequency y(t) is
Hi,
Cross-correlation a very clever idea! Thanks for the reference - Rubiola got
some good sources of reference on his home page.
One thing though - for a phase-noise kit one will probably need to replace
the ZCD with a low-noise amplification stage of around 80dB to be to allow
sampling at ADC
If you can solve the aliasing problem then its easy to average the noise
at frequencies fbeat-foffset and fbeat+foffset to synthesize the
measured phase noise values with a beat frequency of 0 Hz as would be
measured by a conventional phase measurement setup.
Bruce
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
For conventional phase noise measurements at offsets in the (10Hz,
20kHz) range one can use a sound card with a low noise preaamp.
Suitable sound card preamps with lower noise floors than Enrico's or
Wenzel's designs can be built using readily available components.
Wider bandwidths ( up to 1MHz
Hi,
Thanks this is good advice.
Pointing the spectrum analyzer to fc + delta seems to be similar
than deducing phase noise from the ZCD output since this would be with
reference to (fc + delta) in any how? Provided the aliasing issue can be
sorted.
Regarding the aliasing issue - in order to
Thanks,
I'm familiar with the designs you posted to measure voltage noise ect. on
you home page. These, with some modification, mainly removing the blocking
caps, seems that it would do the trick.
Cheers,
Stephan.
On 10 March 2011 10:50, Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz wrote:
For
It is more a matter about that the involved technology could be ITAR
classified or with other export restrictions. Ask Hughes and Boeing
about the fine for export control violations in Intelsat 708 :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelsat_708
I think most people who work with rockets with
El 10/03/2011 15:35, jimlux escribió:
Heck, every time I buy parts at home, it seems the packing slip always
has some sort of generic these parts may be subject to export
controls notice on it. Yep.. those 10Meg resistors just might be a
vital piece of an armament...
This remembers me
Please excuse the off topic nature of this question, but I knew you guys
would know. Is there, or was there a MAR-5 mmic? I thought I had some but
when I look for specs, everything I am finding seems to skip over the MAR-5.
If not, I'll have to dig into my mmic repository to see just what I do
Doh! Never mind. It was the ERA-5SM I was thinking of. Boy, my age is
beginning to show. Apologies.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions
Hello,
In fact there was once (in the '80s I think) a MAR-5, but last time I had to
replace one, I was unable to find the datasheet either, and I replaced it by
an ERA-5SM+ which was fine.
Best regardzs,
Jean-Louis Oneto
- Original Message -
From: John Green wpxs...@gmail.com
To:
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Hi,
Thanks this is good advice.
Pointing the spectrum analyzer to fc + delta seems to be similar
than deducing phase noise from the ZCD output since this would be with
reference to (fc + delta) in any how? Provided the aliasing issue can be
sorted.
Regarding the
Without nulling the carrier the dynamic range of your ADC will limit the
measurement system phase noise fllor.
With a 300KHz beat frequency the post mixer preamp response need not
extend to dc.
Bruce
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Thanks,
I'm familiar with the designs you posted to measure
S/N drops spectacular!
Any probs to cut the noise-floor here? The text looks like art.
- Henry
--
ehydra.dyndns.info
Bruce Griffiths schrieb:
Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
Thanks,
I'm familiar with the designs you posted to measure voltage noise ect. on
you home page. These, with some
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Jean-Louis Oneto
jean-louis.on...@obs-azur.fr wrote:
Hello,
In fact there was once (in the '80s I think) a MAR-5, but last time I had to
replace one, I was unable to find the datasheet either, and I replaced it by
Data sheet for MAR-5 is available here
Thanks for pointing this out David. I already have a couple, and they
are very nice - even keeping good time (domestically speaking - a
couple of seconds per month!) without the EBU/SMPTE time code
reference. (Locking to mains frequency (50 or 60Hz) is possible from
a DIL switch on the back
It perhaps the old story it is difficult for
non-continental Americans have opportunities to
buy valuable time-nuts equipment such as e.g.
Hewlett Packard Vintage Digital Clock Model 115BR-HO8 seen on ebay recently
To temporary cheer up (?) myself I found (and
bought) available on local
The exclusive solution feasible is:
http://shop-emea.u-blox.com/abashop?s=274p=productdetailsku=553
Nice, as you can program it for PPS at 10KHz or some other frequency.
More cheap, not so spectacular:
Cirrus CS2000 PLL
Locks on 50Hz or more
- Henry
--
ehydra.dyndns.info
Cezary Rozluski
At 04:54 PM 3/10/2011, Cezary Rozluski wrote...
Let us suppose I have Thunderbolt (I really have one) as a
time/frequency source, but any other time-nuts recognized frequency
source should by sufficient for the fun to drive old 50/60Hz stuff
with the highest precision available (and for fun,
One Watt per square meter:
http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/watt.html
===
The scandal of the kilogram
http://physicsworld.com/blog/2011/01/by_matin_durrani_with_tunisia.html
By Matin Durrani
With Tunisia in political turmoil, parts of Australia under water and
dozens dead in a Moscow
I can't really add much to the questions - but I am very interested in the
answer!
Tristan
On 11 March 2011 16:33, beale be...@bealecorner.com wrote:
I was interested to see this 2009 Fermilab paper which claims a 10 ps (RMS)
timing resolution in a TDC (time to digital converter) implented in
Le 11/03/2011 01:24, J. Forster a écrit :
One Watt per square meter:
http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/watt.html
===
The ‘scandal’ of the kilogram
First, it’s vital for us as consumers to be confident about what we buy –
we don’t want to be ripped off at the checkout with an underweight
22 matches
Mail list logo