Re: [time-nuts] Oscillator Hookup

2007-05-21 Thread Rex
On Sat, 19 May 2007 08:32:00 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody! I've got a bit of a mystery to solve; I was wondering if you have run in to an Agilent Crystal Oscillator p/n 10811-60168 before. Is that number right? Could it be 10811-60158? If so, or maybe even if not, Tom

Re: [time-nuts] Oscillator Hookup

2007-05-21 Thread Arnold Tibus
On Mon, 21 May 2007 01:28:55 -0700, Rex wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2007 08:32:00 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody! I've got a bit of a mystery to solve; I was wondering if you have run in to an Agilent Crystal Oscillator p/n 10811-60168 before. - {Aside to TvB] While looking

[time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-M-XO reference question

2007-05-21 Thread Tom Clifton
Before I go and spend $150 on eBay for one - I would like to know if they can be used as a stand-alone GPS desciplined oscillator without the 10mhz input from the rubidium unit. Also - has anybody found a manual on-line for one of these guys? 73 - Tom in St. Louis There was an older posting

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 34, Issue 36

2007-05-21 Thread Frequency Standards Services
Message: 1 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [time-nuts] Oscillator Hookup To: time-nuts@febo.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Hi everybody! I've got a bit of a mystery to solve; I was wondering if you have run in to an Agilent Crystal Oscillator p/n

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 34, Issue 41

2007-05-21 Thread jsternmd
Do you know more about the alarm pinouts... what their setpoints or trigger levels are? 73 Jerry K1JOS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 21, 2007 12:00 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: time-nuts Digest, Vol 34, Issue 41 Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to

[time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Didier Juges
I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the local Trimble rep. In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare board) is $75, and the Mini-T (which is a complete embedded GPSDO on a PWB) is $945.

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Didier Juges
Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. Didier KO4BB Didier Juges wrote: I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the local Trimble rep. In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Tim Shoppa
Didier Juges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless you need the very small form factor and low power consumption, and unless the performance (so far, data is unavailable, I have asked for Allan Variance data) is outstanding, the Fury is a better deal, in my opinion. What's the street price of a

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
Didier Juges wrote: Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. Didier KO4BB Didier Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical? Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify that the timing error is stochastic. Bruce

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Tom Van Baak
I asked and got a quote for small quantities of the Resolution-T GPS receiver (specified at 15nS rms from UTC) and the Mini-T GPSDO from the local Trimble rep. In qty 1-9, the Resolution-T GPS receiver (bare board) is $75, and the Mini-T (which is a complete embedded GPSDO on a PWB) is

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Didier Juges
Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote: Didier Juges wrote: Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. Didier KO4BB Didier Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical? Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify that the timing error is stochastic.

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread SAIDJACK
In a message dated 5/21/2007 17:59:43 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Didier Juges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless you need the very small form factor and low power consumption, and unless the performance (so far, data is unavailable, I have asked for Allan Variance

Re: [time-nuts] New Trimble timing products

2007-05-21 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
Didier Juges wrote: Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote: Didier Juges wrote: Sorry, it's not 15nS rms, it's 15nS at 1 sigma. Didier KO4BB Didier Surely the standard deviation (1 sigma) and the rms values are identical? Specifying 1 sigma is perhaps intended to signify