Has anybody seen anything like this?
The data below is from ntpd's clockstats file. There is no PPS on this
system, but it's synced to a nearby machine that does keep good time.
The TBolt is using the serial port in noselect (aka monitor) mode. I'm just
collecting data like this rather than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 14/07/2008 21:09:41 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have any useful information on using it, or should I open it
up and replace the multiway socket and see if I can do something else
other than mount it outside
Tom Van Baak wrote:
Google for Trimble Palisade or see if this helps:
I did :-)
Thanks for the additional site, I'd not seen that.
Cheers - Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Robert Berg wrote:
I picked up a couple of prewired cables for the Palisade from tiger-
tech.biz
Thanks Bob,
I'll follow that up.
Cheers - Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
Chris Kuethe wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Tim Cwik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have discovered the even though cgps does not report position or time
using the Thunderbolt, the stock gpsd is getting enough timing data to
update ntp. Gpsd is selected as the sys.peer with a jitter
The strength of the station seems to effect the size of the jumps. I switched
from 7980 Master to the Grangeville, LA secondary ( a stronger signal here) and
the jumps are much less with the same reference indicating high 8-5 E11 most of
the time vs E10 before, same default time constant.
I don't know about sending edges that slow into a CMOS chip. Is that
considered kosher for HC-series logic?
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David C. Partridge
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:16 AM
To: 'Discussion of
I found the following extract in David Irving's book Apocalypse about the
bombing of Dresden. Interesting stuff.
Rob Kimberley
The highest precision in navigation was required; only Loran could
provide this. The Royal Air Force's most up-to-date piece of electronic
long-range navigation
I missed the last paragraph
Rob K
.There was however an added complication involved in navigating
successfully to Dresden by Loran-because of the curvature of the earth the
beams would probably not be picked up below nineteen thousand feet. The
Master Bomber and his eight Marker
Right; when the thumbswitches are toggled, the RC integrators will slow down
the edges into pins 9-11. Sometimes CMOS parts will latch up or otherwise
fail to reliably with slow edges -- it probably comes down to the
complementary thing, where both halves of a totem pole can turn on
erratically
Has anyone tried to discipline the RFTG-m-RB without the -XO unit from
a house PPS feed?
I think pins 4 and 8 on J6 are the PPS input.
Scott
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
John Miles wrote:
Right; when the thumbswitches are toggled, the RC integrators will slow down
the edges into pins 9-11. Sometimes CMOS parts will latch up or otherwise
fail to reliably with slow edges -- it probably comes down to the
complementary thing, where both halves of a totem pole can
John Miles wrote:
Right; when the thumbswitches are toggled, the RC integrators will slow down
the edges into pins 9-11. Sometimes CMOS parts will latch up or otherwise
fail to reliably with slow edges -- it probably comes down to the
complementary thing, where both halves of a totem pole can
John Miles wrote:
Right; when the thumbswitches are toggled, the RC integrators will slow down
the edges into pins 9-11. Sometimes CMOS parts will latch up or otherwise
fail to reliably with slow edges -- it probably comes down to the
complementary thing, where both halves of a totem pole can
14 matches
Mail list logo
