Gretchen Baxter wrote:
Hi,
I am doing research for my employer around time synchronization.
I have found a lot of good information at http://www.usno.navy.mil
But does the EU or other European countries have a similar source?
Several universities and scientific organisations in various
Gretchen,
I am doing research for my employer around time synchronization.
I have found a lot of good information at http://www.usno.navy.mil
But does the EU or other European countries have a similar source?
As a European company, my employer would prefer not to base too much of
its
Just looking for basic info and technical info, but with a source I can
quote from the EU community, not US military.
Mainly around basic network time syncronization.
And GPS / Galileo.
thanx!
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Magnus Danielson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gretchen,
I
I forgot to mention in my email yesterday that when I did a degaussing
procedure (using the 10638A) the Beam current peaked above 20 nA during the
early part of the procedure.
At first, I took this an evidence that more beam current could be obtained -
that is, the mass spec system needed to
Also, the magnitude of the bump decreased over time, with is consistent with
the way the degausser works - the current pulse decreases exponentially with
time.
Jeff
Jeffrey K. Okamitsu, PhD, MBA
+1-609-638-5402
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, Jeffrey Okamitsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jeffrey
I remember running this on line aux 0 in the IOS version 11.x days (circa
1999). Was supported on the 7000, 4000 and 2500 series routers. It was
originally designed for a Telecom Solutions (bought by Symmetricom) clock that
would be co-located with the routers in a data centre . I have a PDF
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Gretchen Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looking for basic info and technical info, but with a source I can
quote from the EU community, not US military.
Mainly around basic network time syncronization.
In most EU countries, I believe their national labs
Just a nitpick - the reading on the meter isn't any particular scale,
it's essentially arbitrary.
The actual beam current is typically in the picoamp range. My measured
beam current is only about 400 pA.
I'm not sure what you would be seeing from induction; the beam current
is a result of
Bill. Thanks for the info.
Yep, did the microwave alignment as per the manual. And, I understand how
sensitive it is to find the true peak and that there is very little difference
between the primary and secondary peaks. I am sure I am on the primary peak.
I will try working with the loop
I recently obtained a Datum model# 9390-52321 GPS Time Code Frequency
Generator. This unit has a Rubidium time base.
I hooked the unit up to my Motorola GPS2000 GPS antenna (which is
mounted on the roof of my house) and powered the unit up, but I can't
seem to get the unit to see the
Sounds like you're doing everything right. 9390s are plug-and-play by
nature, so I'd have to wonder if there's some front-end damage to the GPS
receiver.
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Myers, Charlie
Sent: Monday,
I've had three of those units and all three had different gps
receiver/boards. Most as John said, are plug and play', however, all I have
seen require about 40 ma to be drawn by the antenna to eliminate the antenna
error on the display after it boots up. Most of those high current antennas
12 matches
Mail list logo