Gents,
after the discussion of the pic pps divider's properties let me add that on
http://www.ulrich-bangert.de/html/downloads.html
you can find a version of the pps divider that has been adopted to the Atmel
AVR Mega world. Two versions are available, one uses port A and a second
uses port D
I'm a little nervous about this posting, as it is a couple of weeks
earlier than I'd intended, but with the recent discussion about PPS
dividers, I thought it was appropriate to mention a new TAPR product
that will be shipping within the next month or so.
I've finally finished the TADD-2,
In message 49d20fbd.5010...@febo.com, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
The TADD-2 [...]
Finally that middle shoe drops :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 49d20fbd.5010...@febo.com, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
The TADD-2 [...]
Finally that middle shoe drops :-)
:-)
The back story is that after the TADD-1 I started working on a divider,
but instead of the PIC-based code decided to use a CPLD instead.
A friend has a 5335A counter and bought a Prologix adaptor for it to collect
data. He wrote the software and has had extremely good results. He offered
to do the same for me utilizing my NI adaptor so I could use it for my
various counters. Unfortunately he ran into problems and feels he needs a
Mike Feher wrote:
A friend has a 5335A counter and bought a Prologix adaptor for it to collect
data. He wrote the software and has had extremely good results. He offered
to do the same for me utilizing my NI adaptor so I could use it for my
various counters. Unfortunately he ran into problems
Hello !
I'm new to the list and I have been offered an Austron 2100F receiver at
a good price.
Before jumping in, I have a two questions:
* I read that a new version of LORAN may come along soon. Will my
old receiver be instantly obsolete as a frequency comparator ?
* The receiver is
Manuals and schematics are available on Brooke's www.prc68.com website.
They can be very hard to fix, because there is some really poorly designed
logic circuitry, and the signature analysis functions really can't find
very many problems.
That said, I use a 2100T for my main timing receiver.
Hello Claude,
Austron 2100F will only be good for the old LORAN-C, not any enhanced
e-LORAN.
Austron has been long out of business, so I would not expect any field
upgrade options.
I have not heard of others doing mods to the 2100F, to be fully e-LORAN
capable.
Brooke has the manual set on
Hi Claude:
For manuals info see:
http://www.prc68.com/I/A2100F.shtml#Man
and ordering see:
http://www.prc68.com/P/Prod.html#Austron
The enhanced LORAN-C adds a pulse after the existing group with a variable
time delay. All the existing receivers will continue to operate. Part of
the new system
Chuck Harris cfhar...@erols.com wrote:
They can be very hard to fix, because there is some really poorly designed
logic circuitry, and the signature analysis functions really can't find
very many problems.
Interesting. Can you say more?
I tried to repair mine -- I have a signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
