Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Hal Murray wrote: There is another way to compare two frequencies, relevant when they are very close together. I divide a reference down to 100KHz and use it to clock a phase detector made of a pair of D flip flops. The unknown (divided to 100KHz) is fed into the circuit and an output

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Neville Michie
Hi, the original was built using a HP10811 oscillator and a Garmin 17 GPS that delivered PPS. The HP10811 ran a divider by 10 by 10 by 10 down to 1 hz. I was the servo that adjusted the EFC of the OCXO so that the PPS matched the 1Hz. The divider clocked a counter of three decades of BCD,

Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom X72

2010-07-26 Thread Steve Rooke
Brice, On 26/07/2010, Heathkid heath...@heathkid.com wrote: Last night, as suggested by several people on this list... I ordered a Trimble Thunderbolt from Bob Mokia, fluke.l so I should be in pretty good shape there to get started once it arrives. Sounds like your starting on the long path

Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom X72

2010-07-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi One issue with the FE's is they often show up as conversions. Various sellers take the 1 pps version and hack in a 10 MHz output. There is a lot of room for error in the conversion process. Bob On Jul 26, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com wrote: Brice, On

Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom X72

2010-07-26 Thread Steve Rooke
Yes, it's because of the various types that you need to verify exactly what you have. A number of them are made to customer specifications with undocumented option numbers but if you have anything like an option 8 then you have the 1Hz to 20MHz version. Beware that to program the thing you need to

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread EWKehren
Hi, ten years ago not having a super counter I copied the input circuit of the Austron 2110 that using an XOR gate mixes 5 MHz with 500 Hz getting 5.0005 MHz. It is devided down to 1.0001 Mhz which in turn is mixed in 74 HC 74 D F/F giving 100 Hz, that most counters are able to count at

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Peter Vince
Sorry Bert, I don't follow the last part about the 100Hz - can you explain further please? (and is that 100.00 or 100.01 Hz?) Peter On 26 July 2010 14:27, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote: Hi,  ten years ago not having a super counter I copied the input circuit  of the Austron 2110 that using

Re: [time-nuts] This group will appreciate this

2010-07-26 Thread swingbyte
On 24/07/2010 1:47 PM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: I picked up an old black bakelite phone in an antique shop and have it nicely on display on a table. I have wired it through to my workshop where it is connected to the old Australian speaking clock (sync'ed to the GPS of course). So when you pick

[time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread Dan Rae
I have a now useless 2100 Loran receiver / comparator here, does anyone have any use for this? Before I recycle it. (Here is southern California.) Dan ac6ao ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

[time-nuts] Wanted dead oven T'bolt

2010-07-26 Thread Dan Rae
I have an insane desire to marry up a T'bolt with an E1938 OCXO which I have here and can't think of a better use for. Does anyone have a T'bolt with a duff or dead OCXO? TAPR reject pile maybe? Best wishes Dan ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom X72

2010-07-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi One gotcha on the conversions: How close did they set the DDS before they shipped it. A few seem to do a less than perfect job of it. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Steve Rooke Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread Chuck Harris
It isn't useless until the Canada chain goes away in November... And then you might still be able to catch a European chain. -Chuck Harris Dan Rae wrote: I have a now useless 2100 Loran receiver / comparator here, does anyone have any use for this? Before I recycle it. (Here is southern

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I believe what they do is: DSB modulate the 5 MHz with 500 Hz to get 5.0005 and 4.9995 MHz Filter out the 4.9995 MHz with a crystal filter or by using an I/Q modulator (I believe Austron did the I/Q thing rather than the filter). Divide the result by 5 to get 1.0001 MHz Mix the 1.0001 with

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread Dan Rae
Dan Rae wrote: I have a now useless 2100 Loran receiver / comparator here, does anyone have any use for this? Before I recycle it. (Here is southern California.) The Austron is on it's way to a good home where it may still work. dr ___

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Max Robinson
Hal Murray wrote: There is another way to compare two frequencies, relevant when they are very close together. I divide a reference down to 100KHz and use it to clock a phase detector made of a pair of D flip flops. The unknown (divided to 100KHz) is fed into the circuit and an output

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread paul swed
Glad if found a good home. Good to hear Nov on Can chain. But they are still usable if you build the simple LORAN C simulator. Single pic chip/cheap. You can compare references and offsets just like you do today. Thats why I designed the simulator so the austrons would have something to do in

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread EWKehren
Hi, Bob since has explained how the 1.0001 MHz are generated. My Austron uses a Xtal filter. If you want a scan of the circuit contact me direst. The resulting 100 Hz out of the D F/F results in a high resolution representation. 1 Hz is equal to 1E 6. If you now count the 100Hz with a

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4c4daa05.2000...@verizon.net, Dan Rae writes: I have a now useless 2100 Loran receiver / comparator here, does anyone have any use for this? Before I recycle it. (Here is southern California.) Is it the Frequency or the Time version ? Does it do 4-digit GRI ? -- Poul-Henning

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going...

2010-07-26 Thread asmagal
Hello Dan, If it is a 2100T I would be glad to adopt that child. I have already a 2100F currently receiving in Portugal the European LESSAY 6731 Chain. Thanks, Antonio CT1TE Quoting Dan Rae dan...@verizon.net: I have a now useless 2100 Loran receiver / comparator here, does anyone have any

Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100 going... Gone!

2010-07-26 Thread Dan Rae
asma...@fc.up.pt wrote: Hello Dan, If it is a 2100T I would be glad to adopt that child. Antonio, as I thought I said before, it is on it's way to a new home. Dan ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Guy Lewis
-Original Message- There is another way to compare two frequencies, relevant when they are very close together... - I am trying to measure the frequency of a distant on-air signal, with path fading, Doppler shift, and maybe even

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Rather than having the 940 in there, why not just build a (simple) direct conversion receiver? Feed something like the 3335 or 6061 into one port of a suitable mixer. Feed the band pass filtered signal from the antenna into another port. Run the IF output into a preamp / filter and then into

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread J. Forster
What about using an HP 3586 B or C, locked to a local standard, and GPIB interface and averaging the data? It goes to 0.1 Hz right out of the box as I remember. FWIW, -John = Hi Rather than having the 940 in there, why not just build a (simple) direct conversion receiver?

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Didier Juges
The only way to have that kind of meaningful accuracy with an on-air signal outside of ground wave range (a.k.a FMT) is to average over a long time (days) to average out the shift due to variations in propagation. The altitude of the layer reflecting the signals changes over time, so the

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Here's data showing Doppler (and other effects) on WWV as received in Dayton, OH over several days. I took this by reading an HP 3586C frequency counter output via GPIB -- which seems to be a good technique for long-term HF frequency gathering. You need to figure out a way to remove outliers

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Guy Lewis
Thanks Didier, John, John, Bob, all: You may have noticed, I came in next to last out of 35 entries in the last FMT. I was using the power line as an audio reference, but even that unstable reference was minor considering my 30 Hz lissajou error or 60 Hz error wrong sideband error! I am taking

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Didier Juges
I like the 3586 a lot, it's amazing what you can do with it. However, if you send the audio (beat note) to a computer or other instrument, keep in mind that the BFOs are not phase locked to the reference, they are just free standing crystal oscillators, and they may be off by a few Hz. If you

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread J. Forster
It's a remarkable, and largely unappreciated, instrument. I passed them up for years, thinking they were only useful for analog multiplex telephony. It was not until I bought one, almost by accident, at the tail end of a flea and started to play with it, did its utility became apparent. Thje

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Didier Juges wrote: I like the 3586 a lot, it's amazing what you can do with it. However, if you send the audio (beat note) to a computer or other instrument, keep in mind that the BFOs are not phase locked to the reference, they are just free standing crystal oscillators, and they may be off

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Murray Greenman
You guys are trying to crack a nut with a sledgehammer! For a start, as Didier says, you can't possibly read the frequency of a sky-wave signal to 0.01Hz in any short time frame since the Doppler on the signal can be as much as 1ppm (i.e. 10Hz at 10MHz). You can only infer it closer than that by

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Neville Michie
The reason to divide was that the signal from the phase detector folds back as the phase shift gets to 360*. At 10Mhz the fold back occurs every 100ns. At 100kHz it is every 10usec. As the fold back (359.9 - 0.1degree) zone may have false triggering or other noise it made sense for it to be

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Chuck Harris
I suppose that you could always cheat? Since you know where the transmitter is going to be, if you could get a timenut near to the transmitter to give you a beacon to measure 24hrs prior to the event, you could use the diurnal variations that you observed (observe?) on the beacon to predict the

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. WA5ZNU
... I use Peter G3PLX's SBSpectrum as the analyser, where you can trim the sample rate in tiny steps. It also has a frequency resolution of 25mHz, which is more than adequate for HF. My combination has won FMCs, but I still can't resolve 0.01Hz off-air. ... 73, Murray ZL1BPU You might

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I've used the 6790 for this sort of thing before. It's a good choice since the whole signal chain is synthesized (if I remember correctly ..). It's still going to be tough to hit the originally requested accuracy with one. Bob On Jul 26, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Murray Greenman wrote: You

[time-nuts] Heathkid - New time-nut needs help...

2010-07-26 Thread Heathkid
Steve, I changed the subject line because everything that follows has nothing to do with the X72. I hope this doesn't confuse anyone but this subject is probably much better related... Yes, the FEI 5680A's I got are programmable from 1Hz to 20MHz (SMA output / currently set to 10MHz) plus

[time-nuts] Minor correction in Pictic II parts list

2010-07-26 Thread Stanley Reynolds
R25 a 10 K resistor only used with the TTL computer interface option, not used with the RS232 chip, is listed twice as 1% or 5% either will work but you don't need both. Stanley ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Basic question regarding comparing two frequencies

2010-07-26 Thread Max Robinson
Understood. Regards. Max. K 4 O D S. Email: m...@maxsmusicplace.com Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to.