Hi all,
My first goal is to verify the frequency of my different RF sources : 4420B,
some DDS, a N2PK VNA and ISOTEMP 134-10, the next step with the help of an
Excel spread sheet to have some idea about their respective stability.
Equipped with option 010, I would like to know how in which
Am 09.08.2010 14:15, schrieb Loïc MOREAU:
Hi all,
My first goal is to verify the frequency of my different RF sources : 4420B,
some DDS, a N2PK VNA and ISOTEMP 134-10, the next step with the help of an
Excel spread sheet to have some idea about their respective stability.
Equipped with
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
not attempt to understand the source of the errors and work on
Hi
If you have been reading here for a while, you know that I would recommend a
Thunderbolt to just about anybody. They are cheap (for what they are) and
easy to find. My first suggestion would be a TBolt.
Here's another approach:
Do you really need accuracy, or is stability good enough? If
Hi
For that matter, how hard is it to put it in a vacuum with temperature
control? Gets two big issues out of the way pretty fast. We certainly buy
crystal oscillators that are heated and enclosed in pressure tight
containers (not quite the same as vacuum, but close).
Bob
-Original
Le 09/08/2010 18:46, Bob Holmstrom a écrit :
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
not attempt to
Unfortunately Gravity is not constant. Pendulum clocks show cyclic errors
due to the influences of the Moon's and Sun's Gravitational fields. I forget
the amounts but it is in the region of parts in 10 to the 7, which is easily
measurable.
This limits the compensations one can put into a pendulum
You could put a large mass of concrete or somehing above the clock and
crank it up and down, to balance out the computed gravity changes.
:)
-John
==
Unfortunately Gravity is not constant. Pendulum clocks show cyclic errors
due to the influences of the Moon's and Sun's
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09 August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
You
Not so simple... you should move it around in order to balance the
gravity force vector :)
Regards,
Javier
El 09/08/2010 20:09, J. Forster escribió:
You could put a large mass of concrete or somehing above the clock and
crank it up and down, to balance out the computed gravity changes.
:)
Time stands still.
I later thought you could equally use a tank of mercury and pump it up and
down. :)
-John
=
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
Behalf Of Ian Sheffield
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:17 PM
To: j...@quik.com; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re:
Advisable given the required mass will probably be in the 10-100 ton range.
Bruce
J. L. Trantham, M. D. wrote:
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
Behalf Of Ian Sheffield
Sent:
This limits the compensations one can put into a pendulum clock unless you
actually build compensation for those effects too :)
I would think the timing of gravitational effects of the moon and the sun can
be easily predicted. I am not sure the amplitude of these effects can be
precisely
Ahhh, this is more like it! Large gears and thick ropes moving
heavy weights up and down. :)
Of course, you wouldn't want anything digital doing this. Just
a large pendulum clock driving a maze of gears that calculate
solar and lunar positions.
Bill Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: J.
Oh Dear!
What have I started? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Hawkins
Sent: 09 August 2010 21:36
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
Bonsoir Loïc,
and congratulations for your new, nice device.
You should order the T.Bolt from fluke.l on e...y, standard easy kit
with power supply and antenna, just working fine,
The LCD monitor is also quite handy. You may also order an LPRO 101 Rb
standard from him, so you have always a
On 08/09/2010 11:54 PM, Dr. Frank Stellmach wrote:
Bonsoir Loïc,
and congratulations for your new, nice device.
You should order the T.Bolt from fluke.l on e...y, standard easy kit
with power supply and antenna, just working fine,
The LCD monitor is also quite handy. You may also order an LPRO
Nah! No ropes or gears. Just a SS tank on steel stilts and a big mercury
reservoir and a pump.
And it might not have to hold tons. Think of a hollow SS donut with the
pendulum in the clear space.
KISS,
-John
===
Ahhh, this is more like it! Large gears and thick ropes moving
I visited a house in Holland where the whole ceiling was one great solar system
display and the attic a maze of geared mechanisms to control it all.
Supposedly all that needed to be done was to repaint each decade the year plank
that moved along counting the years. Strange that a man would
There are many pieces of technology developed in the 20th century
that have not been applied to pendulum clocks.
My take on much of the technology is that it is too volatile to be of
use in making a better clock. The task is not to keep better time,
that has already been done with
Hi Ian,
Unfortunately Gravity is not constant. Pendulum clocks show cyclic errors
due to the influences of the Moon's and Sun's Gravitational fields. I
forget
the amounts but it is in the region of parts in 10 to the 7, which is
easily
measurable.
This limits the compensations one can
Hi
Putting a computing device on a pendulum to compensate for known effects
is really no different than what you do with a analog or digital TCXO. I
suspect that the gravitational impact of the sun and moon can be calculated
with pretty good precision. The same would be true of secondary
In principle, there is no real reason a Rb, Cs, ot atomic fountain could
not be made to last a very, very long time in a lab. It would certainly be
possible to design a source that is either continuously fed from the
outside or a pair of sources that can be changed to maintain continuous
Not surprising at all.
It's called an Orrery (After the Earl of Orrery, I believe) and it's not all
that hard to do, especially if you approximate with circular orbits and don't
try to do ALL the moons or deal with the rotation of the planet itself.
Getting within a fraction of a percent is
Bob Holmstrom wrote:
Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling it
with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why not
attempt to understand the source of the
Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
For that matter, how hard is it to put it in a vacuum with temperature
control? Gets two big issues out of the way pretty fast. We certainly buy
crystal oscillators that are heated and enclosed in pressure tight
containers (not quite the same as vacuum, but close).
Bob
Ian Sheffield wrote:
What happens when the rope breaks?
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: 09 August 2010 19:10
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Regulating
Javier Herrero wrote:
Not so simple... you should move it around in order to balance the
gravity force vector :)
Regards,
Javier
two large masses rotating around the pendulum, one synchronized with the
sun, one sync'd with the moon.
Having just looked up the orrery stuff, a suitable
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Advisable given the required mass will probably be in the 10-100 ton range.
Bruce
J. L. Trantham, M. D. wrote:
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
Wait a minute.. is it that big? or is it much, much bigger..
Inverse square is involved.
The moon's mass
I screwed up by a factor of a million..
jimlux wrote:
Bruce Griffiths wrote:
Advisable given the required mass will probably be in the 10-100 ton
range.
Bruce
J. L. Trantham, M. D. wrote:
Personally, I would get out of the way. : )
Joe
Wait a minute.. is it that big? or is it much,
A quick review of my pictures of the visit to the Eisinga Planetarium,
especially of the attic mechanism now make me think that his mechanism is a mix
of digital gears and analog string driven mechanisms. I'm still amazed at his
work. N0UU
___
All this talk about regulating a pendulum clock... are you people buying
them, building them, or what?
I'm interested! I keep thinking about it and something keeps bringing me
back to the bob being a neodymium magnet itself. I'm sure you can guess
where I'm headed with that...
73 Brice
Oh, yeah. A combined gravity and earth's magnetic field detector. A 1 second
pendulum will be driven using a Nd magnet about the size of 1/2 a pencil
eraser :-)
Don
- Original Message -
From: Heathkid heath...@heathkid.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
I tried water, then isopropyl, but what worked was a quick cleaning
with a white eraser.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On 08/06/2010 08:15 AM, Ed Palmer wrote:
You mean they are tinned? I received my two boards a couple of days
ago. I thought that they missed the tinning solution. There's just
an
35 matches
Mail list logo