Sadly the MetroPCS guy was a vendor at a now defunct ham swap meet. I've bought
gear from the guy in the past, but don't know his name.
-Original Message-
From: Stanley timen...@n4iqt.com
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 22:25:52
To: Discussion of precise time
Timekeeping errors will be further reduced by
better accounting for the effect of blackbody radiation
on atomic clocks. See
I know it has come up in the past so I thought I would check here
before hunting one down in the outside world.
Anyone have a suitable distribution amplifier that they are looking to
part with? My consumer device count has exceeded my source capability.
:)
Please respond offline, save a few
Overheard from a senior NASA research metrologist:
The only reason we're doing it is because we *can* (improving clock
accuracy, said in the context of the aluminum clock). We can already time
so accurately, just as an example, that if we launched a spacecraft today
toward Sirius we could
On 05/08/2011 02:29 PM, James Hall wrote:
Peter,
I have a Thunderbolt with the DS1620E temperature sensor that I would like to
upgrade to to a C version. I think you said on Time-Nuts that you might have
some of the C version chips. If so, how can I go about getting one or two from
you? I’ll
On 05/09/2011 09:24 AM, Peter Loron wrote:
On 05/08/2011 02:29 PM, James Hall wrote:
Peter,
I have a Thunderbolt with the DS1620E temperature sensor that I would
like to upgrade to to a C version. I think you said on Time-Nuts that
you might have some of the C version chips. If so, how can I
On 5/9/11 8:25 AM, William H. Fite wrote:
Overheard from a senior NASA research metrologist:
The only reason we're doing it is because we *can* (improving clock
accuracy, said in the context of the aluminum clock). We can already time
so accurately, just as an example, that if we launched a
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 Murray Greenman wrote:
I've also observed that JJY40 is now off the air. It has been excellent
reception down here in New Zealand for many years, generally better than
the JJY signal on 60kHz, where of course it competes with other signals.
JJY40 was typically strong
Jim, keep in mind that that was not my statement but one made to a small
group of people, including me, over at the Cape. The guy is a PhD (I know,
I know, I am too, and what does it get me?) senior research scientist at
NASA whose specialty is metrology. Now, you may be convinced that he is a
I wasn't intending to cast aspersions... I was more giving an example of
somewhere that atomic clocks need more work. And, I'm pleased that this
group/list exists.. It's pointed me towards some useful stuff to solve some
problems with the KaTS, and, as well, the archives are a great
Finally got around to doing a bunch of work tonight.
Got my lab Parallels machine all set up. Now have Lady Heather, DG8SAQ
VNWA code, and the VE2ZAZ MoniTrol all running effectively in OS X.
http://www.lensgarage.com/gallery3/index.php/Electronics-and-Ham-Radio/coolstuff
Finally...Next comes
11 matches
Mail list logo
