Re: [time-nuts] Question about precise frequency / phase measurement

2012-04-21 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/20/2012 03:49 PM, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote: It is a circuit that they for instance use in the 2110 where they take the reference input in case of 10 MHz divide by 2 and also divide the 5 MHz down to 500 Hz use an exor and out comes 5.000500 MHz filtered and divided by 5. A similar

[time-nuts] Racal-Dana tactile switches

2012-04-21 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Gentlemen, I know I am not the only one in this group to have difficulties with weak tactile switches on Racal-Dana's 1991/2/6 range of counters. The other day I talked to the chief technician at Rosenkranz-Elektronik which is one of the biggest surplus suppliers in Germany. He knew the problem

Re: [time-nuts] Racal-Dana tactile switches

2012-04-21 Thread Chris Stake
Just a thought: On some equipment, the push-buttons are formed by a rubber mat which is shaped into domes with or without plastic buttons above. If you sacrificed an old calculator it might be possible to cut the rubber mat into individual buttons of a size suitable for refurbishing the Tokos

Re: [time-nuts] Racal-Dana tactile switches

2012-04-21 Thread Stewart Bryant
I know its a hack but I used a small pcb switch and use a sawn off knitting needle when I wish to press one of those buttons. It's a design fault and eventually all of them will fail. Stewart On 21/04/2012 11:58, Chris Stake wrote: Just a thought: On some equipment, the push-buttons are

[time-nuts] Stanford Research PRS-10

2012-04-21 Thread Magnus Danielson
Fellow time-nuts, On monday I picked up my PRS-10 and on friday I picked up the break-out board, PSU and manual. So, today I got around to put the pieces together, with no luck, as it did not lock. After locating a serial cable and hooking up, I was able to start query the PRS-10, and got

Re: [time-nuts] Stanford Research PRS-10

2012-04-21 Thread lists
I'm glad you got it going, but wasn't the consensus of the list that SRS had terrible support on their old gear? I like their arbitrary wabeform generators, but made a mental note to avoid SRS based on a post. I suppose I could have read it elsewhere. -Original Message- From: Magnus

Re: [time-nuts] Stanford Research PRS-10

2012-04-21 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/22/2012 02:31 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: I'm glad you got it going, but wasn't the consensus of the list that SRS had terrible support on their old gear? I ordered break-out board, PSU and manual online, they shipped it and got it to me within days. It's not terrible. Pricey, yes,

Re: [time-nuts] Racal-Dana tactile switches

2012-04-21 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
Stewart wrote: It's a design fault and eventually all of them will fail. I'm not convinced of that. There has been substantial discussion of Racal switches on the list in the past, and I suggested at one point that the failure mechanism (dry, cracked rubber) could be related to the