>
> The clock-correction seemed a bit crude. I expected to find a PI-filter
> and a phase-accumulator to steer the 300 MHz to 37 MHz synthesis.
Actually I do use a phase accumulator, in Fig. 26 it's inside the "binary
search" block. The phase is accumulated during several seconds (longer for
a no
> I was recently reading the manual for the TimePod. It looks quite
> nice. I'm curious as to the price.
I haven't really done a formal "product announcement" on the list or
anywhere else beyond the PTTI show last November, for two reasons. One is
that the PTTI introduction led to a larger-than-
Joe wrote:
I was recently reading the manual for the TimePod. It looks quite
nice. I'm curious as to the price.
http://www.miles.io/
Best regards,
Charles
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.feb
Since you asked, I believe the TimePod is around $5000. An excellent value for
anyone serious about time and freq.
I was lucky enough to meet John recently at the NIST Time and Freq Seminar and
he is a very approachable you should give him a call if you are interested.
Thomas Knox
1-303-554-030
On Jun 17, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Joseph Gray wrote:
> I was recently reading the manual for the TimePod. It looks quite
> nice. I'm curious as to the price. Or is this a case of "if you have
> to ask, you can't afford one"?
The price is right on the TimePod web site: http://www.miles.io.
I couldn't b
> I also picked up my TimePod out of the hands of no other than John Miles
> himself.
I was recently reading the manual for the TimePod. It looks quite
nice. I'm curious as to the price. Or is this a case of "if you have
to ask, you can't afford one"?
Joe Gray
W5JG
__
On 6/17/2012 5:18 PM, Daniel Engeler wrote:
Here is the PDF version of my paper "Performance Analysis and Receiver
Architectures of DCF77 Radio-Controlled Clocks", which was published in the
May 2012 issue of the IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and
Frequency Control:
http://goo
Hi Daniel,
On 17/06/12 23:18, Daniel Engeler wrote:
Here is the PDF version of my paper "Performance Analysis and Receiver
Architectures of DCF77 Radio-Controlled Clocks", which was published in the
May 2012 issue of the IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and
Frequency Control:
h
Fellow time-nuts,
As you know, I spent last week in Boulder. NIST T&F seminar, fellow
time-nuts and much fun.
I also picked up my TimePod out of the hands of no other than John Miles
himself. Being sleep deprived from the travel, progress have been slow,
but I have now come to the point wher
Hi
Very interesting !!!
Thanks very much for sharing it.
Bob
On Jun 17, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Daniel Engeler wrote:
> Here is the PDF version of my paper "Performance Analysis and Receiver
> Architectures of DCF77 Radio-Controlled Clocks", which was published in the
> May 2012 issue of the IEEE Tr
Here is the PDF version of my paper "Performance Analysis and Receiver
Architectures of DCF77 Radio-Controlled Clocks", which was published in the
May 2012 issue of the IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and
Frequency Control:
http://goo.gl/sWjFX
Have fun reading! I'd be glad to he
Hm. Is the paper now online or do I have to add it to my list of
downloads at next university trip?
Thanks -
Henry
Hal Murray schrieb:
enge...@alumni.ethz.ch said:
Building the best DCF77 receiver in the world :-)
You have found the right place. :)
--
ehydra.dyndns.info
Hui,
The older instruments have a very simple command structure. You don't
need the "?" to query. Typically just doing a GPIB Read command (ibread
for NI controllers) will address the counter to output and it will send
the current reading. This can cause a problem if you request data too
soon
I have a old HP5386A counter and a OEM USB-GPIB controller(no tech support), I
use a serial port debug program to send command via USB-GPIB to HP5386A, when I
send "FU2"(Measure period) or "DI"(increment display digis), the 5386 response
the command and worked well, the other control command in
14 matches
Mail list logo
