[time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Rex Moncur
I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage of
both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within a few
ms.

I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program.  When I tick the box
to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each time it
attempts to correct the PC time.  Perhaps there is something I need to do to
configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.

I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use NMEATime
for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
achieve accurate locking of the PC.

Rex VK7MO

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread David J Taylor

I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage of
both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within a few
ms.

I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program.  When I tick the box
to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each time it
attempts to correct the PC time.  Perhaps there is something I need to do to
configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.

I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use NMEATime
for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
achieve accurate locking of the PC.

Rex VK7MO
==

Rex,

Does the GPS 18PC even have a PPS output?  A module which does is this one:

 http://www.adafruit.com/products/746

and there are lots of others.

With Windows-8 and a bit of luck, you don't even need the PPS to get within 
a millisecond - see:


 http://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/bergen_ntp_2.html

and that's over a Wi-Fi connection!  More typically, though, using PPS will 
get you within a millisecond = how much depends on the version of Windows 
you are using:


 http://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/performance_ntp.php#windows-stratum-1

(PC Feenix is currently playing up, hence the glitches)  PC Alta is 
Windows-7, and PC Stamsund Windows-8.  I also have an XP PC whose graphs are 
not so regularly updated:


 http://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/Old-Feenix/feenix_ntp_2.html

using a ublox NEO 6M module from China.

Rather than NMEATime, which uses just a small subset of the capabilities on 
NTP, use the standard NTP software from Meinberg, installed as per my 
instructions here:


 http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html

Once that is done, and you have the serial GPS recognised (its performance 
won't be that good), add the PPS support with the special driver, as 
documented here:


 http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-Vista.html

Performance of a Windows-7 system using that kernel-mode driver is here:

 http://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/alta_ntp_2.html

Averaged jitter of under 35 microseconds.  The Windows-8 system (where the 
more precise timestamp instructions are available in the OS) has jitter 
under 20 microseconds.


73,
David GM8ARV
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Chris Albertson
It's simple, just install and run NTP
http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Rex Moncur rmon...@bigpond.net.au wrote:

 I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage of
 both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within a
 few
 ms.

 I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program.  When I tick the box
 to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each time it
 attempts to correct the PC time.  Perhaps there is something I need to do
 to
 configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.

 I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use NMEATime
 for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
 achieve accurate locking of the PC.

 Rex VK7MO

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Wavecrest DTS-2077 Teardown

2013-08-22 Thread Ed Palmer

Sounds like I need to do some experiments.

Thanks for the advice and idea, Bruce. :)

Ed

On 8/22/2013 12:15 AM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
That will work to some extent however you need to tailor the stage 
gain and bandwidth distribution to suit for optimum performance.
Its somewhat difficult to control the gain and bandwidth of an off the 
shelf CMOS inverter and you also need to know its noise parameters.
Maybe adding resistors in series with the power supply leads of the 
CMOS inveters and adding some output capacitance will suffice to 
adjust the gain and bandwidth.


Bruce

Ed Palmer wrote:
Since you're looking for rise times in the low or sub nanosecond 
range, why wouldn't you include any logic gates where such rise times 
are inherent?  I was thinking of maybe a chain of faster and faster 
logic gates.  For example, Potato Semiconductor - no, I'm not making 
that up - PO74G04A has a risetime of  1 ns and, if you can keep the 
load capacitance low enough, a maximum input frequency of  1 GHz.


Always trying to learn

Ed

On 8/20/2013 11:28 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
The same analysis applies however one would probably use something 
like cascaded longtailed pairs with well defined gain (series 
emitter feedback) and the low pass filter cap connected between the 
collectors rather than opamps.


Bruce

Ed Palmer wrote:
Does anyone know if this situation would benefit from doing 
something similar to a 'Collins Hard Limiter' i.e. instead of 
squaring the signal in one stage, use maybe two or three cascaded 
stages with increasing bandwidths? Normally, Collins limiters are 
used with beat frequencies of less than 1 KHz, but maybe there's 
value in doing at typical time-nuts frequencies.


Any thoughts?

Ed


On 8/20/2013 10:02 PM, Said Jackson wrote:

Hi Ed,

For anything up to about 150MHz try the NC74SZ04 types from 
National if you can find them NOS. they stopped making these years 
ago.. Fairchild is ok too but not as fast from what I have seen.


Forgot I wrote about it in 2009. Oh boy -age kicking in.

Bye,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 20, 2013, at 20:17, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote:


Hi Said,

Yes, I saw your message from 2009 where you warned about the sine 
waves.  That's why I was watching for it. Thanks for the 
warning.  I also realized that a DC Block and a 10 db attenuator 
makes a very nice TTL or CMOS to Wavecrest converter for anything 
except 1 PPS which would need about 15 db.  I tried an old 
circuit that uses an MC10116 ecl line receiver - it's actually a 
dead Racal Dana 1992 counter where I'm using the processing on 
the external reference input to square up the signal.  It gives 
me a slew rate equivalent to about a 50 MHz sine wave.  It helped 
a lot, but not enough. I'll try a 74AC04 and a BRS2G Differential 
Line Receiver (risetime  3ns, 400Mbps throughput).  Both are in 
my junkbox.


Ed


On 8/20/2013 8:12 PM, Said Jackson wrote:

Guys,

The dts needs to be driven by square waves, driving them with 
sine waves gives jitter values that are displayed significantly 
too high due to trigger noise.


Holzworth makes a small sine wave to square wave converter that 
can drive 50 ohms. Use a DC block and an attenuator on the cmos 
output to avoid damaging the dts inputs. You can make your own 
converter using a single fast cmos gate, resistor, and blocking 
cap. By using hand-selected gates I was able to achieve less 
jitter with that circuit than what the Holzworth box was able to 
achieve.


Doing that conversion can bring down the measured rms jitter on 
a very good 10MHz sine wave source from 10ps+ to less than 2ps - 
basically at or below the noise floor of the dts.. Once you run 
at the units' noise floor, you know your source is quite good..


Bye,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:51, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote:


Adrian,

I used Timelab to assess the reaction of the DTS-2077 to 
different sine wave inputs.  The differences in the noise floor 
are surprising.  The attached picture was made by taking the 
output of an HP 8647A Synthesized Generator through a splitter, 
and then through different lengths of cables to the inputs of 
the DTS-2077.  The combination of splitter and cable loss meant 
I couldn't get +7 dbm @ 1 GHz. If I could have, the 1 GHz line 
might have been lower than it was.


Ed




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PTPv2 grandmaster with a Z3805A?

2013-08-22 Thread David Gravereaux
On 08/20/2013 01:51 PM, David Gravereaux wrote:
 Also, and still back to my question, NTPd's control of the radio and PPS
 signal wouldn't be using the same PPS kernel service would it?

Answering my own question, the clock at /dev/ptp0 (on the NIC) is not
the same as the realtime and needs to be disciplined with the phy2sys
utility or in some other manner.

-- 
David Gravereaux davyg...@pobox.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Dimitry Borzenko
 

 Hello. 

You can try  

  

Regards. 

 On 21/08/13 23:48 , Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com sent:
  It's simple, just install and run NTP

 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Rex Moncur  wrote:

  I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage
of
  both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within
a
  few
  ms.
 
  I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program. When I tick the
box
  to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each
time it
  attempts to correct the PC time. Perhaps there is something I need to
do
  to
  configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.
 
  I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use
NMEATime
  for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
  achieve accurate locking of the PC.
 
  Rex VK7MO
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- 
  To unsubscribe, go to
  
  and follow the instructions there.
 

 -- 

 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- 
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 and follow the instructions there.

 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Chris Albertson
Hit send a bit to soon.

NTP will use the best reference clocks it finds.  If that is GPS it will
use that.  It can also use other NTP servers.   Typically people use those
rather then getting their own GPS receiver.  If the PC has a network
connection you can likely get time to within a few milliseconds using NTP
and a few of the pool time servers.

I would defiantly recommend getting NTP to work using the pool servers
first.  Then add GPS.

Be warned that the NMEA spec says that messages apply to the current
second.  This means the NMEA data from the serial port can be up to one
second off.  It is used only to tell you the number of the second, not
for accurate timing.For that NTP uses the PPS reference clock.  On some
GPS receivers (not your Garmin unit) the PPS is good for a few tens of
nanoseconds.

I looked up NMEATime.  It uses SNTP protocol.  It will never be very
accurate.  Think about a mechanical clock that you want to set.  First to
set it then you wait a day or so and see if it gains or looses time.  Then
you adust the rate, faster or slower.  Eventually the clock keeps good time
after a few more cycles of adjust and wait and check.   NTP works like
this.  SNTP simply sets the clock once then quits and never even looks at
the rate.

This is the place to get NTP
http://www.ntp.org
However many Windows users like to get third party versions of NTP.  These
are packages with installers and are good for people who can't build and
install the source distribution.  Google should find one.

About your Garmin GPS.   You can buy a real timing receiver for under $20
on eBay.  If you need nanoseconds that is the way to go.   A timing
reciever will have at least two features (1) position hold, where the
receiver is told it is NOT moving and (2) self survey, where the reciever
can take about 30 minutes or longer to deterim it's position to typically
less than a meter.  Position uncertainty creates time uncertainty (by the
speed of light) so not knowing you location by a meter means you don't know
the time within about 3 nanoseconds.






On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 It's simple, just install and run NTP
 http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html


 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Rex Moncur rmon...@bigpond.net.auwrote:

 I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage of
 both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within a
 few
 ms.

 I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program.  When I tick the
 box
 to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each time
 it
 attempts to correct the PC time.  Perhaps there is something I need to do
 to
 configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.

 I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use NMEATime
 for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
 achieve accurate locking of the PC.

 Rex VK7MO

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 --

 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Dimitry Borzenko
 

 Hello 

You can try Nmeatime: www.visualgps.net/NMEATime/ 

 Regards

 On 21/08/13 23:48 , Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com sent:
  It's simple, just install and run NTP

 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Rex Moncur  wrote:

  I am trying to lock a Windows XP computer to GPS time taking advantage
of
  both the NEMA sentence and the 1PPS with the hope of getting to within
a
  few
  ms.
 
  I am using a Garmin GPS 18PC and the NMEATime program. When I tick the
box
  to implement the 1PPS feature on NMEATime the program locks up each
time it
  attempts to correct the PC time. Perhaps there is something I need to
do
  to
  configure the GPS 18PC to fix this.
 
  I would be grateful for advice as to whether and how one can use
NMEATime
  for this purpose with a Garmin GPS 18 PC or advice on other programs to
  achieve accurate locking of the PC.
 
  Rex VK7MO
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- 
  To unsubscribe, go to
  
  and follow the instructions there.
 

 -- 

 Chris Albertson
 Redondo Beach, California
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- 
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 and follow the instructions there.

 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread David J Taylor

Hello

You can try Nmeatime: www.visualgps.net/NMEATime/

Regards
===

Some advantages of the standard NTP software over NMEATime are listed here:

 http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html#why

The OP's main problem is that his GPS receiver does not include PPS, but a 
new, low-cost receiver easily solves that problem.


Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Hal Murray

albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:
 NTP will use the best reference clocks it finds.  If that is GPS it will
 use that.  It can also use other NTP servers.   Typically people use those
 rather then getting their own GPS receiver.  If the PC has a network
 connection you can likely get time to within a few milliseconds using NTP
 and a few of the pool time servers. 

I think you are missing the big picture.

The OP wanted GPS time.

NTP isn't setup to work with GPS time rather than UTC.

None of the typical low cost GPS/NMEA receivers tell you GPS time rather than 
UTC.  Some of them tell you the offset.

If you really want GPS time, you have two choices.
  One is to get UTC via NTP and the offset via IERS, USNO, and NIST, and 
probably others.
  This has troubles when the leap-second offset changes.

  The other would be to listen to various GPS devices and see if you can get 
GPS time rather than UTC.  It might work to hack various refclock drivers 
distributed with the NTP reference package.





-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] ***SPAM*** Cartoon :)

2013-08-22 Thread Hal Murray

Is anybody collecting time-nuts cartoons?

http://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread David J Taylor

From: Hal Murray

I think you are missing the big picture.

The OP wanted GPS time.

NTP isn't setup to work with GPS time rather than UTC.
[]
=

I think the OP wants UTC time from a GPS rather than GPS time.  But even 
if it /was/ GPS time, couldn't a set of simple fudge statements in the NTP 
configuration provide that?  OK, you would need to change the fudge lines 
when the GPS to UTC offset changed...


Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ***SPAM*** Cartoon :)

2013-08-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20130822082311.30224406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net, Hal Mu
rray writes:

Is anybody collecting time-nuts cartoons?

http://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/

You mean like this:

http://faculty.ucc.edu/business-greenbaum/images/NanosecZits.jpg


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] strange hp 5345A option C19

2013-08-22 Thread Luca Dal Passo
Thank you Nigel for your comment.
Now I understand the reason why it may be useful to have this
additional external link.
In the counter is fitted an oscillator model 10544A (instead of a more
known 10811), but I think  that it is the original one because the
date code of the serial number is a bit old (year 1981). At that date,
the 10544 was still in use. Observing carefully the way  in which the
internal connections to the Ref In and Out are made, I notice that
wires, insulating material and sockets are different from the original
HP's. So it seems actually to be a user made modification not related
to option C19.
Good bye
Luca




2013/8/21  gandal...@aol.com:
 Hi Luca

 There are other items of HP equipment fitted with Ref Out  and Ref In
 terminals joined by an external link, with the intention that  the link is
 removed to connect an external standard to the Ref In terminal,  but in a 
 normal
 5345A the external reference is used to phase  lock the internal oscillator
 which means that the unit can't work from an  external reference if the
 internal 10MHz oscillator has been  removed.

 However, I found some time ago that it is possible, just by fitting a
 single link internally, to drive the counter via an external reference even if
 the internal standard has been removed so I'm guessing that the internal
 standard on this one might have been removed at some time and a previous
 owner has fitted a non original internal standard with a similar provision  to
 bypass the normal arrangement.

 It should be fairly easy to check just by looking to see if the  original
 HP oscillator is still fitted or whether a different one has been  added.

 Whether or not this relates to the Option C19 I don't know.

 Regards

 Nigel
 GM8PZR


 In a message dated 21/08/2013 17:00:21 GMT Daylight Time, iw2...@gmail.com
 writes:

 Dear  all,

 I have bought an HP 5345A. It’s ok and I’m  very glad. On the rear
 panel it is wrote OPTION C19 (a little bit  strange!) and there are
 two additional BNC installed on the little panel  normally used to
 place the HPIB connector when present.

 These 2 BNCs  are named REF OUT and REF IN and there is a jumper cable
 that connects the  output to the input.

 It seems to be a modification made by some user  (very strange: I can’t
 understand why to place an extra auxiliary bypass  for the 10 MHz
 reference).

 Do you have an idea about this strange  modification and about the
 strange option C19? Could it be a custom option?  Could the option C19
 and the 2 BNC for the reference be  related?

 Thanks

 Bye

 Luca – IW2LJE – Milano –  Italy
 ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Cartoon :)

2013-08-22 Thread Hal Murray

p...@phk.freebsd.dk said:
 You mean like this:
   http://faculty.ucc.edu/business-greenbaum/images/NanosecZits.jpg 

Neat.  Thanks.

I remember that one from ages ago.

Does anybody have a URL for the original/official cartoon?
Or even just the name of that cartoon strip?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Cartoon :)

2013-08-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20130822101451.41cac406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net, Hal Mu
rray writes:

 You mean like this:
  http://faculty.ucc.edu/business-greenbaum/images/NanosecZits.jpg 

Does anybody have a URL for the original/official cartoon?
Or even just the name of that cartoon strip?

The strip is simply called Zits I'm surprised how anybody can
live on this planet and not know it :-)

http://zitscomics.com/

I don't belive their on-line archive stretches that far back...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest DTS-2077 Teardown

2013-08-22 Thread Adrian

John,

I'm using a NI GBIP-USB-B.
The monitor feature does not time out, just the acquisition itself.

Adrian

John Miles schrieb:

What GPIB adapter are you using?  Does the 'Monitor' feature also time out,
or just the acquisition itself?

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Adrian
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:26 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest
DTS-2077 Teardown

To be more precise, I have a working DTS-2077 and tried it a few times
with TimeLab.
TimeLab was always running fine for a few seconds but then it stopped
and displayed a timeout error.
So, what's wrong?

Adrian

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] strange hp 5345A option C19

2013-08-22 Thread GandalfG8
Hi Luca
 
The earlier 5345As were fitted with the 10544A oscillator, I've seen units  
with both that and the later 10811, so it could indeed be the original  
oscillator.
If your 10544A has the PCB edge connector and  is installed in the usual 
place then without seeing what's actually been  done I'm a bit lost as to why 
it would have been modified. If there was a  problem perhaps with the 
original int/ext reference switching, or with the phose  locking to an external 
source, that might be a reason, but for that it sounds  like quite a drastic 
fix:-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 22/08/2013 10:31:06 GMT Daylight Time, iw2...@gmail.com  
writes:

Thank  you Nigel for your comment.
Now I understand the reason why it may be  useful to have this
additional external link.
In the counter is fitted  an oscillator model 10544A (instead of a more
known 10811), but I  think  that it is the original one because the
date code of the serial  number is a bit old (year 1981). At that date,
the 10544 was still in use.  Observing carefully the way  in which the
internal connections to the  Ref In and Out are made, I notice that
wires, insulating material and  sockets are different from the original
HP's. So it seems actually to be a  user made modification not related
to option C19.
Good  bye
Luca




2013/8/21   gandal...@aol.com:
 Hi Luca

 There are other  items of HP equipment fitted with Ref Out  and Ref In
 terminals  joined by an external link, with the intention that  the link 
is
  removed to connect an external standard to the Ref In terminal,  but in 
a  normal
 5345A the external reference is used to phase  lock the  internal 
oscillator
 which means that the unit can't work from an   external reference if the
 internal 10MHz oscillator has been   removed.

 However, I found some time ago that it is possible,  just by fitting a
 single link internally, to drive the counter via an  external reference 
even if
 the internal standard has been removed so  I'm guessing that the internal
 standard on this one might have been  removed at some time and a previous
 owner has fitted a non original  internal standard with a similar 
provision  to
 bypass the normal  arrangement.

 It should be fairly easy to check just by looking  to see if the  original
 HP oscillator is still fitted or whether  a different one has been  added.

 Whether or not this  relates to the Option C19 I don't know.

  Regards

 Nigel
 GM8PZR


 In a  message dated 21/08/2013 17:00:21 GMT Daylight Time, 
iw2...@gmail.com
  writes:

 Dear  all,

 I have bought an HP  5345A. It’s ok and I’m  very glad. On the rear
 panel it is wrote  OPTION C19 (a little bit  strange!) and there are
 two  additional BNC installed on the little panel  normally used to
  place the HPIB connector when present.

 These 2 BNCs  are  named REF OUT and REF IN and there is a jumper cable
 that connects  the  output to the input.

 It seems to be a modification  made by some user  (very strange: I can’t
 understand why to place  an extra auxiliary bypass  for the 10 MHz
  reference).

 Do you have an idea about this strange   modification and about the
 strange option C19? Could it be a custom  option?  Could the option C19
 and the 2 BNC for the reference  be  related?

 Thanks

 Bye

  Luca – IW2LJE – Milano –  Italy
  ___
 time-nuts  mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the  instructions there.
  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.
___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest DTS-2077 Teardown

2013-08-22 Thread John Miles
Hmm.  Both the monitor window and acquisition loop use 5-second GPIB
timeouts, so they should theoretically behave the same.  What is the exact
error message it's giving you during acquisition?

Are you using double precision, and/or a large sample size relative to the
sampling interval?  I don't recall the particulars but I did see some
timeout issues depending on how much processing the Wavecrest box was being
asked to do. 

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Adrian
 Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:08 AM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest
 DTS-2077 Teardown
 
 John,
 
 I'm using a NI GBIP-USB-B.
 The monitor feature does not time out, just the acquisition itself.
 
 Adrian
 
 John Miles schrieb:
  What GPIB adapter are you using?  Does the 'Monitor' feature also time
out,
  or just the acquisition itself?
 
  -- john, KE5FX
  Miles Design LLC
 
  -Original Message-
  From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On
  Behalf Of Adrian
  Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:26 AM
  To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was:
Wavecrest
  DTS-2077 Teardown
 
  To be more precise, I have a working DTS-2077 and tried it a few times
  with TimeLab.
  TimeLab was always running fine for a few seconds but then it stopped
  and displayed a timeout error.
  So, what's wrong?
 
  Adrian
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-
 nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-
 nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola Oncore UT just powered up?

2013-08-22 Thread Alan Kamrowski II
Hi Everyone,

 

I'm converting a Neo 6M GPS data stream to the Motorla Oncore UT data stream
my RFTG expects.  When first turned on the 6M doesn't have a 1pps signal
yet, but does post NMEA messages which lack data are invalid.  My question
is, what does the binary data stream from a Motorola Oncore UT look like?
It is binary so if anyone has one and can capture a power on in hex that
would be very helpful.

 

Thanks,

 

Alan

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest DTS-2077 Teardown

2013-08-22 Thread Adrian

John,

The displayed error message is:
'Acquisition failed - trigger poll operation timed out - check addresses'

I have tried both, single and double precision.
The sampling rate was either determined automatically by running the 
monitor or edited manually. The latter appeared to work even worse.


Sometimes it times already out while establishing GPIB connection. Best 
case it runs up to tau = some 3 seconds.


I've never observed the monitor function timing out.

Adrian


John Miles schrieb:

Hmm.  Both the monitor window and acquisition loop use 5-second GPIB
timeouts, so they should theoretically behave the same.  What is the exact
error message it's giving you during acquisition?

Are you using double precision, and/or a large sample size relative to the
sampling interval?  I don't recall the particulars but I did see some
timeout issues depending on how much processing the Wavecrest box was being
asked to do.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Adrian
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:08 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was: Wavecrest
DTS-2077 Teardown

John,

I'm using a NI GBIP-USB-B.
The monitor feature does not time out, just the acquisition itself.

Adrian

John Miles schrieb:

What GPIB adapter are you using?  Does the 'Monitor' feature also time

out,

or just the acquisition itself?

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]

On

Behalf Of Adrian
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:26 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wawecrest DTS-2077 with TimeLab: was:

Wavecrest

DTS-2077 Teardown

To be more precise, I have a working DTS-2077 and tried it a few times
with TimeLab.
TimeLab was always running fine for a few seconds but then it stopped
and displayed a timeout error.
So, what's wrong?

Adrian

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-

nuts

and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-
nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola Oncore UT just powered up?

2013-08-22 Thread Peter Bell
The board on it's own comes up in a mode that doesn't send anything until
it's initialized.  The RFTG-m-XO is responsible for setting up the board.
 This is what you see on the RX line after powerup:

Note that this is from WinOncore - the real data doesn't have the (Rx)
prefix and the data is in binary rather than hex.  After this, it repeats
with one @@En message sent for every 12 @@Ea messages


(Rx)@@Fa 8000
(Rx)@@Fa 8000
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C81090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Aw 00
(Rx)@@Ay 
(Rx)@@Az 
(Rx)@@At 00
(Rx)@@Ag 0A
(Rx)@@En
3C01000D01010001010202D009191B2FAF08001316142FAF0800022FAF080005
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C000581090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C000A81090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C000F81090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C001481090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C001981090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C001E81090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C002381090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C002881090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C002D81090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C003281090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C003781090019001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C010081090019001B001300160014000200050009



On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Alan Kamrowski II ala...@earthlink.netwrote:

 Hi Everyone,



 I'm converting a Neo 6M GPS data stream to the Motorla Oncore UT data
 stream
 my RFTG expects.  When first turned on the 6M doesn't have a 1pps signal
 yet, but does post NMEA messages which lack data are invalid.  My question
 is, what does the binary data stream from a Motorola Oncore UT look like?
 It is binary so if anyone has one and can capture a power on in hex that
 would be very helpful.



 Thanks,



 Alan

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola Oncore UT just powered up?

2013-08-22 Thread Alan Kamrowski II
Hi Peter,

Thank you for posting this - it is interesting.

An @@Ea message only occurs once every 5 seconds?

It seems odd that it comes up with 08-11-2017 at 12:00:00

My RFTGm-II-Rb doesn't seem to mind it isn't getting the @@En messages...

Thanks,

Alan


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Peter Bell
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:27 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola
Oncore UT just powered up?

The board on it's own comes up in a mode that doesn't send anything until
it's initialized.  The RFTG-m-XO is responsible for setting up the board.
 This is what you see on the RX line after powerup:

Note that this is from WinOncore - the real data doesn't have the (Rx)
prefix and the data is in binary rather than hex.  After this, it repeats
with one @@En message sent for every 12 @@Ea messages


(Rx)@@Fa 8000
(Rx)@@Fa 8000
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Aw 00
(Rx)@@Ay 
(Rx)@@Az 
(Rx)@@At 00
(Rx)@@Ag 0A
(Rx)@@En
3C01000D01010001010202D009191B2FAF080013
16142FAF0800022FAF080005
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0005810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C000A810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C000F810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0014810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0019810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C001E810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0023810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0028810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C002D810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0032810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0037810900
19001B001300160014000200050009
(Rx)@@Ea
081107E10C0100810900
19001B001300160014000200050009



On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Alan Kamrowski II
ala...@earthlink.netwrote:

 Hi Everyone,



 I'm converting a Neo 6M GPS data stream to the Motorla Oncore UT data 
 stream my RFTG expects.  When first turned on the 6M doesn't have a 
 1pps signal yet, but does post NMEA messages which lack data are 
 invalid.  My question is, what does the binary data stream from a 
 Motorola Oncore UT look like?
 It is binary so if anyone has one and can capture a power on in hex 
 that would be very helpful.



 Thanks,



 Alan

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Halcyon OFS-1 Circuit Diagram or Manual?

2013-08-22 Thread Mike Niven
I have acquired an old working 198kHz/162kHz off-air frequency standard that 
appears to be a Halcyon OFS1 circuit board mounted in a DIY case. I think this 
since
it came with a sheet of alignment instructions from Halcyon which certainly 
ties 
up with the PCB layout but the case is not made to professional standards. So, 
nice enough 
looking, but with no manufacturer's logo or model number to really identify 
it.

If it is an OFS1, would anybody have a circuit diagram or manual to enable me 
to confirm my theory?  I can't find very much on the web about Halcyon products 
as the company is long gone.
 
Many 
thanks.

Mike
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola Oncore UT just powered up?

2013-08-22 Thread Peter Bell
Yeah. I can't think of any reason that it would need the TRAIM messages - I
thnk it's just being reported so that the official software can get access
to the information.  I'm not sure where the date is coming from - there is
no battery on the UT+ in the RTFG-m-XO, and the cable I was using to get
that dump doesn't have the TX data line connected, so it can't have come
from the PC.

The other thing is that I don't have a log of the input data to the
receiver, just the outputs - but I'm pretty sure that the Oncore generates
an output message for every input message it sees, so just the outputs
should be enough.



On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Alan Kamrowski II ala...@earthlink.netwrote:

 Hi Peter,

 Thank you for posting this - it is interesting.

 An @@Ea message only occurs once every 5 seconds?

 It seems odd that it comes up with 08-11-2017 at 12:00:00

 My RFTGm-II-Rb doesn't seem to mind it isn't getting the @@En messages...

 Thanks,

 Alan


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Peter Bell
 Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:27 AM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Can someone post the @@Ea messages from a Motorola
 Oncore UT just powered up?

 The board on it's own comes up in a mode that doesn't send anything until
 it's initialized.  The RFTG-m-XO is responsible for setting up the board.
  This is what you see on the RX line after powerup:

 Note that this is from WinOncore - the real data doesn't have the (Rx)
 prefix and the data is in binary rather than hex.  After this, it repeats
 with one @@En message sent for every 12 @@Ea messages


 (Rx)@@Fa 8000
 (Rx)@@Fa 8000
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Aw 00
 (Rx)@@Ay 
 (Rx)@@Az 
 (Rx)@@At 00
 (Rx)@@Ag 0A
 (Rx)@@En

 3C01000D01010001010202D009191B2FAF080013
 16142FAF0800022FAF080005
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0005810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C000A810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C000F810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0014810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0019810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C001E810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0023810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0028810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C002D810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0032810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0037810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009
 (Rx)@@Ea

 081107E10C0100810900
 19001B001300160014000200050009



 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Alan Kamrowski II
 ala...@earthlink.netwrote:

  Hi Everyone,
 
 
 
  I'm converting a Neo 6M GPS data stream to the Motorla Oncore UT data
  stream my RFTG expects.  When first turned on the 6M doesn't have a
  1pps signal yet, but does post NMEA messages which lack data are
  invalid.  My question is, what does the binary data stream from a
  Motorola Oncore UT look like?
  It is binary so if anyone has one and can capture a power on in hex
  that would be very helpful.
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
 
 
  Alan
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- 

Re: [time-nuts] Halcyon OFS-1 Circuit Diagram or Manual?

2013-08-22 Thread Alan Melia
Hi Mike I have had a Halcyon OFS-1 for 20 years and been looking for a 
manual/circuit during that time. Mine was bought from Halcyon and came with 
an A4 sheet of paper !Not alignment instructions!! I have been looking 
for detail ever since. I would certainly be interested to see a copy of the 
alignment instructions.


I very nearly ripped mine apart several years ago when I found the output 
phase breathing with a period of about 100 seconds. After double checking 
my local standards and using another receiver, I contacted Peter Whibberly 
at NPL and they had not seen it because they integrate over a much longer 
period to get parts in 10^12. I was put in touch with an engineer at 
Droitwich, he looked but didnt find anything wrong (they did not have an 
off-air standard!) However the problem improved at the time of the 
inpection -))  Subsequently I got an email from Peter about 6 weeks later 
saying that the synthersizer had failed completely !!  After the repair the 
phase drift against my local standard was much better and probably at the 
limit of short term daytime off-air measurementI couple of parts in 
10^11


My case is a cream textured finish in two identical parts. The rear panel 
has a ferrite antenna hinged to it, though an expernal antenna can be used. 
I believe some of the later units locked an ovened oscillator and contained 
a dil-switch set synthersizer to generate quasi-synch carrier frequencies. 
It may be you have an OFS pcb out of one of these that has been recased??


Best Wishes
Alan
G3NYK

- Original Message - 
From: Mike Niven mfni...@ymail.com

To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Halcyon OFS-1 Circuit Diagram or Manual?


I have acquired an old working 198kHz/162kHz off-air frequency standard that 
appears to be a Halcyon OFS1 circuit board mounted in a DIY case. I think 
this since
it came with a sheet of alignment instructions from Halcyon which certainly 
ties
up with the PCB layout but the case is not made to professional standards. 
So, nice enough

looking, but with no manufacturer's logo or model number to really identify
it.

If it is an OFS1, would anybody have a circuit diagram or manual to enable 
me to confirm my theory? I can't find very much on the web about Halcyon 
products as the company is long gone.


Many
thanks.

Mike
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there. 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Hal Murray

 I think the OP wants UTC time from a GPS rather than GPS time.

In case, it should be simple.


 But even  if it /was/ GPS time, couldn't a set of simple fudge statements
 in the NTP  configuration provide that?  OK, you would need to change the
 fudge lines  when the GPS to UTC offset changed...

I think that would work.

Another complication is that there isn't any fudge offset for other servers 
(non refclocks) so you can't use normal servers running on UTC as a sanity 
check.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] ***SPAM*** NPR Story on Atomic Clocks

2013-08-22 Thread Hal Murray
The World's Most Precise Clock Could Prove Einstein Wrong

http://tinyurl.com/kuwhq47
http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/214186448/the-worlds-most-precise-clock-could-pr
ove-einstein-wrong
Audio is 4:12

Nice picture.
This may look like a mad scientist's garage sale, but it's actually the most 
precise clock ever built.


What a makes a good clock? Andrew Ludlow, a physicist at the National 
Institute of Standards and Technology, says one of the most important 
criteria is stability.

...

That's not much of an effect, but it's big enough for most atomic clocks to 
measure. And Ludlow's clock can register the change in gravity across a 
single inch of elevation. That kind of sensitivity will allow scientists to 
test Einstein's theories with greater precision in the real world.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread Rex Moncur
Hi David

Yes I did not make myself clear but I am looking for UTC time from a GPS.
Thanks for all your references which I will work through and see how I go.

Regards Rex VK7MO

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David J Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2013 6:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

From: Hal Murray

I think you are missing the big picture.

The OP wanted GPS time.

NTP isn't setup to work with GPS time rather than UTC.
[]
=

I think the OP wants UTC time from a GPS rather than GPS time.  But even
if it /was/ GPS time, couldn't a set of simple fudge statements in the NTP
configuration provide that?  OK, you would need to change the fudge lines
when the GPS to UTC offset changed...

Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] PRS10 time to lock

2013-08-22 Thread Paul
As I patiently wait for my PRS10 to lock I'm curious if there's a
limit beyond which I should assume the unit is faulty.

It does produce abount 10MHz (+- .2 Hz) and the oven current dropped
at what I assume is operating temperature.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 time to lock

2013-08-22 Thread paul swed
I can't directly speak to a PRS 10 but from the hp 5065 to FE's and FRS
20-40 minutes would be typical. The newer smaller ones seem to be within 20
minutes. They are below .2 Hz when locked.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL/1


On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Paul tic-...@bodosom.net wrote:

 As I patiently wait for my PRS10 to lock I'm curious if there's a
 limit beyond which I should assume the unit is faulty.

 It does produce abount 10MHz (+- .2 Hz) and the oven current dropped
 at what I assume is operating temperature.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 time to lock

2013-08-22 Thread Said Jackson
Paul, i think 8 min is stated somewhere...

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 22, 2013, at 18:10, Paul tic-...@bodosom.net wrote:

 As I patiently wait for my PRS10 to lock I'm curious if there's a
 limit beyond which I should assume the unit is faulty.
 
 It does produce abount 10MHz (+- .2 Hz) and the oven current dropped
 at what I assume is operating temperature.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Help in Locking a Windows Computer to GPS Time

2013-08-22 Thread David J Taylor

From: Hal Murray


I think the OP wants UTC time from a GPS rather than GPS time.


In case, it should be simple.


But even  if it /was/ GPS time, couldn't a set of simple fudge 
statements

in the NTP  configuration provide that?  OK, you would need to change the
fudge lines  when the GPS to UTC offset changed...


I think that would work.

Another complication is that there isn't any fudge offset for other servers
(non refclocks) so you can't use normal servers running on UTC as a sanity
check.
===

Oh, if you can't use a fudge on other servers, that's a pity, and I wouldn't 
then trust such a fiddled clock.  Mind you, I can quite understand why it's 
not allowed!


Thanks, Hal.

David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.