On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
Expecting that unit to meet holdover after only being locked for 12 hours is
not
a reasonable thing.
So it would seem.
Perhaps I was being a bit optimistic for out-of-the-box performance:
the brochure listed the holdover
You could always use the traditional method of piercing saw and files.
Thinking about it I suppose files were the original milling machine. Be
aware that the horological approach is different from the engineering
approach and there are numerous traps waiting for the unwary. Harrison
and
I saw Harrison's number one (its replica?) at Greenwich some time ago. It is a
dual pendulum, 180 out of phase. I remember a lot of springs.
Don
Peter Torry
You could always use the traditional method of piercing saw and files.
Thinking about it I suppose files were the original milling
Hi
inevitably on these devices, there is a marketing brochure that hits the high
points
in the specification. That information is public and intended to get “buzz”
going on
the product. Once an OEM gets serious about the product, (the TBolt is targeted
at OEM’s) a detailed specification gets
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Charles Steinmetz
csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:
Pete wrote:
On a related note, is it possible to extract any data regarding the
training from the unit?
Not as far as the time-nuts community knows, no (other than looking at the
DAC voltage and temperature
