Hi Chuck,
I've renamed this thread, and expect it to die quickly. I have a bunch of
things running on my Linux system, so I see a lot of interactions that probably
don't happen to others. One thing is that Timelab doesn't like to come up
properly under Wine. For some reason, it mostly comes
Hi Magnus,
Would the 5335A have the same sort of clock noise that I'm seeing on the 5370?
I see it when testing on both the 5335A and the 5370A. I'm setting up a new
test as follows: Internal 5370A clock, PPS from GPSDO to arm input, PRS45A to
start input, and a 6 ft piece of RG-58 from
Might look at this:
http://qulsar.com/Products/Managed_Timing_Engines/MTE_Board_P6X.html
It has PTP, sNTP, comes with a TCXO, OCXO as an option or bring your own
oscillator through the 40 pin connector.
Link
On May 12, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Mark Spencer m...@alignedsolutions.com wrote:
Hi
Hi
One of the (many) nice thing(s) about TimeLab is that you can run multiple
plots on the same data. Often
when you see wiggles in one plot, looking at another plot can help you figure
out what is going on.
The “best guess” when you see wiggles on the left side, is a spur or beat note.
Bob
Bob Stewart wrote:
... And kudos to John for Timelab. It doesn't play well with Wine in Linux, but
that's not terribly surprising, all things considered.
Really? How so?
Wine tends to be a bit more pedantic than windows itself, but
most things, that don't go out of their way to break Wine,
Hi Bob,
On 05/14/2015 05:11 AM, Bob Stewart wrote:
I got a new 5370A, so of course I've been running a bunch of tests on it. In the image linked
below, the start channel is my PRS-45A, the stop channel is my GPSDOe (e is for engine)
and the ARM channel is fed by the PPS from my SSR-6Tru. As
Hi Bob,
The beat note idea occurred to me, as well. I see the disturbance in the
force when using the internal clock (10811) of the 5370A, as well as when
using the 10811 from the 5335A as the reference. But, if this were the case,
I would think it would be a well known phenomenon.
Harlan,
On 05/14/2015 01:34 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
NTF is working to improve the products under its umbrella all the time,
and we're seriously resource-constrained. OK, we're disturbingly
resource-constrained. While the PTPd folks seem to have enough
developer resources and Richard Cochran
joseph.tu...@hp.com said:
The cave has network connectivity, and is network close (but not
physically close) to a high-quality surveyed GPS disciplined stratum 1 NTP
server which we have permission to run off of.
That sounds like it is likely to be a reasonably common case. I'd expect the
On 5/13/2015 4:44 PM, Tucek, Joseph wrote:
In response to Oz-in-DFW
Given your description here, I'm guessing a millisecond or ten
will do that as long as local cluster relative accuracy is maintained.
Spot on; I hope I'd made it clear earlier, but perhaps I've been
communicating poorly.
10 matches
Mail list logo
