Re: [time-nuts] Modulation Domain Analysis

2015-07-12 Thread Bill Byrom
Bob, I'm the Tektronix Application Engineer who posted about this topic about a month ago. Sorry for the delay in responding to your question about the B channel divider feature. Since the TVC501 measures period, it will have a very low resolution when measuring higher frequencies (such as 10

Re: [time-nuts] Any other useful purpose for Austron 2100F or SRS FS700 receivers in US

2015-07-12 Thread paul swed
Magnus I use a 420 ohm resistor to make FS700 happy. I have a LORAN C whip antenna and preamp that then feeds a distribution amplifier for the 4 Loran C rcvrs. The loran C simulator lives in the same box and can feed the rcvrs also. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Magnus

Re: [time-nuts] LORAN-C reception in the UK

2015-07-12 Thread Magnus Danielson
It is given somewhat indirectly. Initially plans was for 200 km. The final system map had 100 km and 400 km marks. Read the linked PDF. Cheers, Magnus On 07/12/2015 12:48 AM, Björn wrote: Did you check the jamming radius? div Originalmeddelande /divdivFrån: Magnus Danielson

Re: [time-nuts] Any other useful purpose for Austron 2100F or SRS FS700 receivers in US

2015-07-12 Thread Bob Camp
Hi So far, all of the eLoran stuff has been backwards compatible with Loran-C. If the signal turns into a “time signal only” in the future, that could change. Since the only signals that have been put on the air have been Loran-C compatible, any change is pure speculation at this point. Any

Re: [time-nuts] Any other useful purpose for Austron 2100F or SRS FS700 receivers in US

2015-07-12 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
Hello Jim, Would you happen to have complete schematics for the Austron 2100F? 73's, John AJ6BC On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:38 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote: They can be useful as a comparator between two references as long as you have a LORAN C simulator to drive the system. I

Re: [time-nuts] Any other useful purpose for Austron 2100F or SRS FS700 receivers in US

2015-07-12 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, For the USA and Canada, currently LORAN-C is history. However, LORAN-C signals is still relatively well know and eLoran is a backward compatible change for which there already is a market, so that is good. I think I recall another digital signal being discussed as a side-band, which I