Re: [time-nuts] ADEV measurement question

2015-08-23 Thread Tom Van Baak
 To learn more, I think the best way would be to put the 
 counter into its fast binary mode and acquire 1k time 
 interval samples per second. That would give me loads of 
 data to play with and it would be easy to try out how 
 different averaging schemes affect the result.

Matthias,

See: http://leapsecond.com/pages/adev-avg/ for the results of a similar ADEV 
averaging experiment. I can send you the raw data if you want.

What helped me understand the issue was to think in terms of frequency 
*in*stability instead of frequency stability. We often use the words 
interchangeably. But imagine that your goal is to measure oscillator noise, its 
instability, not its stability. With this new mental image the last thing you 
would do is average. By its very nature, averaging removes highs and lows and 
smoothes things out. If your goal is to measure instability, averaging removes 
the very thing you're trying to measure.

The plots in the above web page show this dramatically. You can make an 
oscillator as good as you want if you average enough.

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
H
 
I think I'm convinced, I had my doubts to start with and  now have enough 
more to ensure I follow a different  route:-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR

Hi
 
 If they are indeed grabbing anything in that package and re-labeling it, I 
would 
 be very careful. True TCXO’s (full compensation network) in that package 
are 
 relatively rare compared to the enormous number of “precision XO’s” made 
 in the same package. The XO’s had no real compensation. They simply 
 relied on a packaged crystal to deliver a tighter stability than the open 
blank
 DIP XO’s of the same era. 
 
 The other obvious issue of a relabel process would be that the one I get 
and 
 review likely has no relation at all to the one you get and try to use. We 
could 
  have parts each built to totally different specs and each made by who 
knows who. 
 
 Bob
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Running voltages through MVAR (In re: HP5065)

2015-08-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I have decided it is finally time to come clean about one of my
trade secrets:  I sometimes run voltages through MVAR.

Sometimes I also run temperatures, kilowatts and anything else
I happen to have a time-series of through the MVAR.

In this case, it tells us a lot about why the C-field current of
my HP5065 is unstable:

http://phk.freebsd.dk/hacks/HP5065A/20150822_mvar/index.html

I'm not done collecting data for the resulting effect on the HP5065
performance, but so far it looks like the MVAR floor is half of
what it used to be.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

I think the lead length on the parts argues against them being pulls from 
boards. It does
*not* eliminate the possibility. I’ve seen low cost manufacture that never did 
any lead trim. 
I would not put it at the top of my list for “fancy oscillator of the year”. 
The price is high enough
that you could put together a fairly nice un-compensated XO from parts for much 
less money.
If it *is* an XO, you are paying a lot for it. 

Bob


 On Aug 23, 2015, at 12:30 PM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com 
 wrote:
 
 H
 
 I think I'm convinced, I had my doubts to start with and  now have enough 
 more to ensure I follow a different  route:-)
 
 Regards
 
 Nigel
 GM8PZR
 
 Hi
 
 If they are indeed grabbing anything in that package and re-labeling it, I 
 would 
 be very careful. True TCXO’s (full compensation network) in that package 
 are 
 relatively rare compared to the enormous number of “precision XO’s” made 
 in the same package. The XO’s had no real compensation. They simply 
 relied on a packaged crystal to deliver a tighter stability than the open 
 blank
 DIP XO’s of the same era. 
 
 The other obvious issue of a relabel process would be that the one I get 
 and 
 review likely has no relation at all to the one you get and try to use. We 
 could 
  have parts each built to totally different specs and each made by who 
 knows who. 
 
 Bob
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] DIY Time-Nut Night Stand

2015-08-23 Thread Gregory Beat
For the time-nut that has everything ...

IKEA RAST Night Stand - $15
http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/44361109/

Hacking the IKEA RAST
http://www.instructables.com/id/8U-Rack-Case-From-IKEA-RAST-Table/?ALLSTEPS

A few changes/suggestions:

1. IF you only need a 6U night stand, consider flipping it as an option -- 
especially if you desire another equipment piece on top , like the 
Masterclock TCD 26 (big night stand clock display)

AkroBins storage containers
https://akro-mils.com/Products/Types/Plastic-Storage-Containers/AkroBins

2. Raxxess Rack Rails, better choice (6U or 8U).  Sold at Guitar Center retail 
stores, Amazon, etc.
http://www.amazon.com/Raxxess-Rack-Rails-Black-Space/dp/B000K6B38C

3. If you desire casters, threaded inserts for the pine wood would be a better 
idea.

4. Power strip could be added to rear of cabinet (vertical or horizontal 
mounting),
to reduce cord clutter.

w9gb

Sent from iPad Air
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
Hi Tim,
 
Thanks for your comments and I did wonder about the plating, in the  photo 
for the auction number I gave I couldn't decide if the bottom of the can  
was corroded or just badly plated.
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 

Mainstream TCXO's moved entirely to surface-mount many years ago.
 
 These Vanguard DIP units have to be washed/replated RFE parts. It's a
 shame they are so completely relabeled because the original
 manufacturer/part number is nowhere to be found, and I'm sure this lost
 info would be interesting to a time-nut. They seem to be especially popular
 with audiophools (probably the gold).
 
 Tim N3QE
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Pete Lancashire
From the way the descriptions read, there must be a audiofool in there
somewhere

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Tim Shoppa tsho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mainstream TCXO's moved entirely to surface-mount many years ago.

 These Vanguard DIP units have to be washed/replated RFE parts. It's a
 shame they are so completely relabeled because the original
 manufacturer/part number is nowhere to be found, and I'm sure this lost
 info would be interesting to a time-nut. They seem to be especially popular
 with audiophools (probably the gold).

 Tim N3QE

 On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:59 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts 
 time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

  The Vanguard ultra precision Golden TCXO, their description not
 mine:-),
  has been listed on Ebay for a while now at various frequencies, and  the
  0.1 ppm spec caught my eye as a possible replacement for  the around 6
 or 7
  ppm oscillator in a DDS function generator I've been  using.
 
  One typical current auction, for a 25MHz unit, is 111071283814.
 
  Has anybody tried any of these and/or come across any more data
 elsewhere?
 
  Regards
 
  Nigel
  GM8PZR
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
Hi Bob,
 
Just the sort of things I was wondering and lot's of questions  indeed, 
that's why I asked, I didn't want to be the guinea  pig:-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 

Hi
 
 A few things I would wonder about:
 
 1) Is it 0.1 ppm over 0 to 50C (or some other range)? If not, what is the 
temperature stability?
 2) Does it run at 3.3V -or- at 5V (pick one) or do they run equally well 
at either voltage?
 3) Since there is no EFC, is 0.1 ppm the set tolerance? If it’s not, what 
is the initial accuracy?
 
 Lots of questions, there’s not much information there. That may be due to 
the seller not
 having the information. It also may just be because nobody ever asked. The 
term TCXO can
 mean a variety of things to a different people ….
 
 The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it. 
 
 Bob
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Running voltages through MVAR (In re: HP5065)

2015-08-23 Thread Tom Van Baak
Poul-Henning,

I abuse ADEV too! It really works well in some cases, doesn't it. Very clever 
of you to try it on a 5065A with voltage, current. etc. I assume you use the 
y-form (frequency) not the x-form (phase) in this case?

Notes:

1) The scale is more intuitive, I find, when sqrt is used -- so I'm curious why 
you chose MVAR instead of MDEV?

2) When plots mostly head down with a -1 slope, consider TDEV instead of MDEV, 
which effectively rotates by 45 degrees turning -1 slopes into 0 slopes. For 
some kinds of data a rise above a normal (zero) slope is more informative than 
a bend of a steep -1 line. Psychologically too, it removes the things are 
working better and better as time goes on impression that happens with a -1 
slope, e.g., when ADEV is used on data from a locked loop.

3) Before you settle on MDEV, also try ADEV. There are cases where the massive 
averaging inside of MDEV ruins interesting noise periodics that would show up 
in ADEV. Then if you want to combine (2) and (3) you can compute ADEV(tau) * 
tau. Look at http://leapsecond.com/tools/adev5.c for the undocumented z flag. 
Like the real TDEV is to MDEV, this is a sort of TDEV for ADEV, but without the 
sqrt(3). It plots a zero slope where ADEV would plot a -1 slope.

/tvb

- Original Message - 
From: Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 11:16 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Running voltages through MVAR (In re: HP5065)


I have decided it is finally time to come clean about one of my
 trade secrets:  I sometimes run voltages through MVAR.
 
 Sometimes I also run temperatures, kilowatts and anything else
 I happen to have a time-series of through the MVAR.
 
 In this case, it tells us a lot about why the C-field current of
 my HP5065 is unstable:
 
 http://phk.freebsd.dk/hacks/HP5065A/20150822_mvar/index.html
 
 I'm not done collecting data for the resulting effect on the HP5065
 performance, but so far it looks like the MVAR floor is half of
 what it used to be.
 
 -- 
 Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
 FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
 Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Tracor 599 for sale in Italy

2015-08-23 Thread Andrea Baldoni
Hello All.
I just stumbled upon this announce (I'm not the seller and I'm not related
to him in any way) for a Tracor 599k VLF/LF tracking receiver with manual
included. It has a chart plotter for phase difference.

http://www.kijiji.it/annunci/altro-elettronica/pistoia-annunci-buggiano/tracor-599k-vlf-lf-receiver/80388385

Andrea
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Tim Shoppa
Mainstream TCXO's moved entirely to surface-mount many years ago.

These Vanguard DIP units have to be washed/replated RFE parts. It's a
shame they are so completely relabeled because the original
manufacturer/part number is nowhere to be found, and I'm sure this lost
info would be interesting to a time-nut. They seem to be especially popular
with audiophools (probably the gold).

Tim N3QE

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:59 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts 
time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

 The Vanguard ultra precision Golden TCXO, their description not mine:-),
 has been listed on Ebay for a while now at various frequencies, and  the
 0.1 ppm spec caught my eye as a possible replacement for  the around 6 or 7
 ppm oscillator in a DDS function generator I've been  using.

 One typical current auction, for a 25MHz unit, is 111071283814.

 Has anybody tried any of these and/or come across any more data  elsewhere?

 Regards

 Nigel
 GM8PZR
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

A few things I would wonder about:

1) Is it 0.1 ppm over 0 to 50C (or some other range)? If not, what is the 
temperature stability?
2) Does it run at 3.3V -or- at 5V (pick one) or do they run equally well at 
either voltage?
3) Since there is no EFC, is 0.1 ppm the set tolerance? If it’s not, what is 
the initial accuracy?

Lots of questions, there’s not much information there. That may be due to the 
seller not
having the information. It also may just be because nobody ever asked. The term 
TCXO can
mean a variety of things to a different people ….

The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it. 

Bob

 On Aug 23, 2015, at 4:59 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com 
 wrote:
 
 The Vanguard ultra precision Golden TCXO, their description not mine:-),  
 has been listed on Ebay for a while now at various frequencies, and  the 
 0.1 ppm spec caught my eye as a possible replacement for  the around 6 or 7 
 ppm oscillator in a DDS function generator I've been  using.
 
 One typical current auction, for a 25MHz unit, is 111071283814.
 
 Has anybody tried any of these and/or come across any more data  elsewhere?
 
 Regards
 
 Nigel
 GM8PZR
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
The Vanguard ultra precision Golden TCXO, their description not mine:-),  
has been listed on Ebay for a while now at various frequencies, and  the 
0.1 ppm spec caught my eye as a possible replacement for  the around 6 or 7 
ppm oscillator in a DDS function generator I've been  using.
 
One typical current auction, for a 25MHz unit, is 111071283814.
 
Has anybody tried any of these and/or come across any more data  elsewhere?
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble GPS board

2015-08-23 Thread Angus
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:25:04 -0400, you wrote:

rbenward at verizon.net wrote: See below, here is a 73090
OCXO (same as on some of those GPSDO boards) powered by +12V.

You are incorrect in your assumption that the link you have
supplied shows a 73090 OCXO powered by +12VDC. The BOARD is
indeed powered by 12VDC (or 15VDC if you read the listing)
but if you look at all the photos you will see a 3-terminal
regulator on the bottom of the pc board.

Hi,

It does indeed have a reg, but as far as I can see it's a 7812 that's
in the picture in the listing. This would also explain why it has a
12V or 15V selector link.

I'm not suggesting that it's a 12V osc - on my 57963-80 it is
definitely fed just 5V from the regulator. I also used 6V for the
power supply.
It also appears just to be a basic, fast warm-up AT OCXO, which fits
in with the short time constant on the GPS control loop.

Angus.

The Trimble GPSDO I'm supplying 6.3VDC to had a 5 volt regulator
that has a measured output of 5.00VDC and the supply pin on the
oscillator had that 5.00VDC on it, not the 6.3VDC from my supply.
A continuity check shows a direct connection from the regulator's
5 volt output directly to the oscillator's supply pin. Because
of the higher current drawn by the 5 volt oven, running the input
to the board at 12VDC and wasting all that power as heat would
not be wise. 6.3VDC makes me happy and they chose a LDO regulator
for a good reason.

The one error I did notice is I said the board locked after it
found satellites but that is incorrect. It does find satellites
quickly but takes about 10 minutes to lock and that is when the
10Mhz output is enabled. I did some of my checking around 1AM
and that is not a good time for clear thinking or writing.

-Arthur
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble GPS board

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The gotcah (as many here have found out the hard way) is that the OCXO is 
indeed a +5V part and not a +12V unit. Apparently the internal Chinese market 
has them mis-labeld. That bleeds over into the listings you see on eBay. There 
are a *lot* of mistaken listings ….

Bob

 On Aug 22, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Bob rbenw...@verizon.net wrote:
 
 Hi Arthur,
 Thank you for this information.  I have not received my board yet, I probably 
 still have a few weeks to go.  The LT1764 will take up to 20V, but I would 
 never go to the edge.  You could easily do 12V, the only downside is the 
 dissipation in the LT17654.  Use a variable power supply and raise the 
 voltage slowly.  Monitor the temperature with a thermocouple,  IR spot meter 
 (radio shack had one for $10), or just use your finger.  If you can keep your 
 finger on it comfortable for a long period of time, the temp should be OK.  
 The junction temp is rated for 125C.
 
 Now on the flips side, my only concern is the regulator is not supplying the 
 oven power.  Most Trimble OCXOs I see on Ebay are powered by +12.  When 
 supplying only 6.5V the oven might not get up to temp producing frequency 
 instability and some erratic EFC stats.
 
 See below, here is a 73090 OCXO (same as on some of those GPSDO boards) 
 powered by +12V.  It's possible the regulator is meant to be powered from 
 +12V, supplying power to the digital logic and to the oscillator portion of 
 the OCXO. Then +12V directly supplies the oven.
 
 http://www.ebay.com/itm/10-00MHz-Trimble-Double-Oven-OCXO-Trimble-73090-Double-sinewave-15V-12V-/251883335405?hash=item3aa56aaeed
 
 I will post my success and let everyone know how I make out.  I purchased 
 this to have a backup for my Z3801  Z3805.  Both are on the fritz, I will be 
 post those trials and tribulations on a new thread.  Thanks so much for your 
 response.
 
 Bob
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble GPS board

2015-08-23 Thread Angus
Hi Bob,

I got a Trimble 57963-80  last year and the 73090 OXCO and some other
parts on it are supplied with 5V from the LT1764A.

The DSP, FPGA, etc., also have various small regulators supplying
their supply voltages - one even has a dropper resistor in series.
These are connected to the main input supply, so raising it above what
it should be is probably not a good idea.

I thought at first that the LT1764A would be thermally connected to
the fixing hole beside it so that the heat could be removed, but it is
only connected to the copper on the top of board at that point - then
again, that may be the way it was mounted.

I did put a temp sensor on the 1764 to see how much it heated up
during warm up and when running, but neither looked close to being a
problem when run at 6V and room temperature. 
At 6V, it took 2A during warm up and just over 1A when running at room
temp, but the warm up is fast.

When I got the board, someone had written on the OCXO with a marker
pen what the pins were, and the power was marked as 12V, and an EFC
voltage was also written on (about 0.2V from what I measured) which
was all a little weird.

It was listed as having been tested, but since the seller said that
they had no connection info, who tested it and how is anyone's
guess...

Angus.


On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 14:02:35 -0400, you wrote:

Hi Arthur,
Thank you for this information.  I have not received my board yet, I 
probably still have a few weeks to go.  The LT1764 will take up to 20V, 
but I would never go to the edge.  You could easily do 12V, the only 
downside is the dissipation in the LT17654.  Use a variable power supply 
and raise the voltage slowly.  Monitor the temperature with a 
thermocouple,  IR spot meter (radio shack had one for $10), or just use 
your finger.  If you can keep your finger on it comfortable for a long 
period of time, the temp should be OK.  The junction temp is rated for 
125C.




Now on the flips side, my only concern is the regulator is not supplying 
the oven power.  Most Trimble OCXOs I see on Ebay are powered by +12.  
When supplying only 6.5V the oven might not get up to temp producing 
frequency instability and some erratic EFC stats.

See below, here is a 73090 OCXO (same as on some of those GPSDO boards) 
powered by +12V.  It's possible the regulator is meant to be powered 
from +12V, supplying power to the digital logic and to the oscillator 
portion of the OCXO. Then +12V directly supplies the oven.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/10-00MHz-Trimble-Double-Oven-OCXO-Trimble-73090-Double-sinewave-15V-12V-/251883335405?hash=item3aa56aaeed

I will post my success and let everyone know how I make out.  I 
purchased this to have a backup for my Z3801  Z3805.  Both are on the 
fritz, I will be post those trials and tribulations on a new thread.  
Thanks so much for your response.

Bob
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble GPS board

2015-08-23 Thread Angus

On the left front corner of the board is the 1 PPS connector.
To the right of that connector are 4 unpopulated holes for a
connector. I traced those out and found 2 went to a RS-232
chip that appears to be a different type depending on which of
the boards you receive. The left hole is ground (RS-232 pin 5
on the computer end), then the next hole is not connected, then
RS-232 pin 2, then pin 3 being the hole with the square index pad
on the right. Using a terminal emulator program and 57600 8N1N
I was able to communicate with the board. Typing '?' will give
you a long list of all the commands it will accept. For instance,
'STAT' and 'POSSTAT' are 2 of the commands that will give you
info on how the board is working. Typing *IDN? at the UCCM-P 
prompt returns 57964-60 for my board and POSSTAT shows up to 12
satellites can be tracked. The date code on my unit is 2009.
The board seems to work well but the OCXO runs pretty hot so it
probably isn't a double oven. The multicontact connector probably
has most of the functions and LED signals available but I couldn't
see using it so I'll get whatever signals I want directly off the
pc board.

Hi Arthur,

That's interesting - I connected my one up to Trimble studio and
others, but got no joy - I never thought of just asking it :)

I went through the connections on the other pins, but most are just to
the FPGA or 0V. Most don't appear to be doing a lot - maybe they need
whatever is meant to be connected to this board to be connected before
they do anything.

There is another serial port which is the same baud rate but appears
to be binary, and prattles away every 2 seconds:
Pin 36 goes to Pin 4 of the UART (RX)
Pin 37 goes to Pin 8 of the UART (TX)

Pin 2 has binary data of about 64 bits at 1.6us/bit - looks like maybe
a timer or similar.

(Above pin numbers assume V+ is connected to pins 44-50 and are
hopefully correct, but always worth checking)


Angus.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If they are indeed grabbing anything in that package and re-labeling it, I 
would 
be very careful. True TCXO’s (full compensation network) in that package are 
relatively rare compared to the enormous number of “precision XO’s” made 
in the same package. The XO’s had no real compensation. They simply 
relied on a packaged crystal to deliver a tighter stability than the open blank
DIP XO’s of the same era. 

The other obvious issue of a relabel process would be that the one I get and 
review likely has no relation at all to the one you get and try to use. We 
could 
 have parts each built to totally different specs and each made by who knows 
who. 

Bob

 
 On Aug 23, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Tim Shoppa tsho...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Mainstream TCXO's moved entirely to surface-mount many years ago.
 
 These Vanguard DIP units have to be washed/replated RFE parts. It's a
 shame they are so completely relabeled because the original
 manufacturer/part number is nowhere to be found, and I'm sure this lost
 info would be interesting to a time-nut. They seem to be especially popular
 with audiophools (probably the gold).
 
 Tim N3QE
 
 On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:59 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts 
 time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
 
 The Vanguard ultra precision Golden TCXO, their description not mine:-),
 has been listed on Ebay for a while now at various frequencies, and  the
 0.1 ppm spec caught my eye as a possible replacement for  the around 6 or 7
 ppm oscillator in a DDS function generator I've been  using.
 
 One typical current auction, for a 25MHz unit, is 111071283814.
 
 Has anybody tried any of these and/or come across any more data  elsewhere?
 
 Regards
 
 Nigel
 GM8PZR
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Running voltages through MVAR (In re: HP5065)

2015-08-23 Thread Magnus Danielson

Poul-Henning,

Using ADEV and MDEV, and indeed TDEV as TVB points out, for analyzing 
other physical signals than phase/frequency is maybe not very common, 
but if Kocher if you know your field well enough.


David Allan and I discuss this every once in a while. ADEV/MDEV and 
friends is really the statistical tools to analyze and separate noises 
of different slopes. Together with the bias functions you can use it to 
verify you have the white noise you assume, and only then you can 
rightfully make use of that property to meet the intention of GUM.


Flicker noise is indeed one such noise-form that does require better 
tooling.


Don't forget to use FFT as well as analyzing non-repetitive systematic 
trends. I'd love to see the raw data more closely.


So keep up the good work.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 08/23/2015 08:16 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

I have decided it is finally time to come clean about one of my
trade secrets:  I sometimes run voltages through MVAR.

Sometimes I also run temperatures, kilowatts and anything else
I happen to have a time-series of through the MVAR.

In this case, it tells us a lot about why the C-field current of
my HP5065 is unstable:

http://phk.freebsd.dk/hacks/HP5065A/20150822_mvar/index.html

I'm not done collecting data for the resulting effect on the HP5065
performance, but so far it looks like the MVAR floor is half of
what it used to be.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bill Byrom
I can't imagine that anyone would trust some 0.1 ppm specification
just because an unknown party stamped that on the case. There are many
sellers of very similarly marked oscillators. They all are selling in
single quantities for about the same price. The market seems to be
hobbyists, especially audio fanatics who want to reduce the jitter in
their audio gear. Since no reputable manufacturer would purchase such
gray market parts with zero reputation (no known manufacturer of the
item), nobody will be performing incoming inspection on these devices.
So nobody knows what they are getting - if they install it and it isn't
on frequency how would the buyer know what was wrong?

Notice that there does not appear to be a Vanguard oscillator company
or trade name used by some other manufacturer. The units are not marked
with a model number. There is no real datasheet or specifications. There
is no description of what the 0.1 ppm refers to, but it's printed
right there on the case so it appears to be an attempt to give the
product some type of quality.

The obviously flouting of eBay and international customs regulations
also shows the lack of trust you should have in that seller.
 Shipping invoice will be declared with low value and mark as 'gift' or
 'samples'

See the eBay rules:
 http://pages.ebay.com/help/pay/international-shipping-rules.html
 Note: It's illegal to falsify customs declarations or mark an item as
 a gift in order to avoid customs fees. If a buyer asks you to commit
 customs fraud, report it to us.

If the seller is faking custom forms, how do you know that anything they
say is true?
--
Bill Byrom N5BB
 
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] picPET, Raspberry Pi, Logging, and a GPS module

2015-08-23 Thread Ben Hall

Evening all,

Months ago, I bought several picPET's from Tom Van Baak:

http://leapsecond.com/pic/picpet2.htm

Plan was to set up a power line phase measurement system using my Z3801 
GPSDO as the 10 MHz input.  Life intervened...and finally got back to 
that project today.


I decided to do preliminary playing around to make sure I got 
everything working right before I hooked it up to the Z3801 and a 
transformer that would sample the line frequency.  Tom included a nice 
little 10 MHz oscillator unit, so I got to work using that as the 10 MHz 
reference...and searching around for something to use as an event pulse, 
I found a GPS unit that had what I suspected to be a 0.5 PPS output. 
(two birds, one stone!)


The collection device was to be a Raspberry Pi computer as they are 
simple, cheap, and in my experience, work pretty well.


First thing to do on the RPi was to disable the serial console so that I 
could use those UART pins as the serial input.  There are a number of 
automated way to do that online.


Second thing to do was to get serial into the RPi and display it.  Found 
another script to do that online.  Initially the output from the picPET 
was garbage, but thankfully I was using a pP05 and pulling pin 4 high 
made the text readable.


Third thing to do was to get some sort of serial logging program.  I 
found one called grabserial.  http://elinux.org/Grabserial  Grabserial 
is nice because it has a lot of options that will make it nice to use in 
an automated fashion.  IE:  I can tell it to collect for X seconds, 
record to a file, then terminate, plus log the system clock for giggles.


Grabserial gave me fits!  Turns out that it doesn't pass the command 
line switch for the RPi serial port somehow, but editing the source to 
reflect /dev/ttyAMA0 as the serial port made it work.  (I submitted an 
issue on github to the development team to see if I'm an idiot or if 
this is a real issue)


Fourth thing was to figure out how to name files using the time and date 
so I don't have data file collisions.  Studying the date command yielded 
an answer:


now=$(date +%Y-%m-%d__%k-%M-%S)
python grabserial.py -e 30 -t -T -v -o log.$now.log

This names the log file log.YEAR-MONTH-DAY__HOUR-MIN-SEC.log which is 
mighty handy.


Next up - setting up a chron job to run the above once per day so I get 
one data file per day, keeping the file size manageable.  Also need to 
get Samba working so I can pull the data files off the RPi onto the PC 
for manipulation.  :)


thanks much and 73,
ben, kd5byb







___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

I just spent some “quality time” looking at what Mouser offers in the way of 
crystal 
oscillators. None of this work was NIST certified. Others could do the same 
thing. 

You have a number of candidates in the “dip clock” stability category both 
in traditional (leaded) and modern (SMT) packages. They are at “basement 
experimenter” 
sort of prices ($20 down to under $1). I would not trust any of them as a legit 
standard for a project.

Next up are a number of products from people who are very proud of what they 
are selling. 
The prices are 10 to 50X higher than the simple product ( $200). To me that 
puts them out of
the basement experiment category. When I look at what  $50 gets me on eBay, I 
sort of wonder
why you would go that way on an a one off design. 

In the middle, there are a surprisingly small number of products. There are a 
few OCXO’s and a few TCXO’s. 
The pickings are pretty slim. If I need something like an odd frequency …good 
luck in that range. 

The bottom line is that there really aren’t a lot of choices. It’s nice to use 
“real parts” with “real specs”. The nature
of the distribution process is that there is a (basement incompatible ) markup 
on exotic parts. It’s not limited in any
way to oscillators. Volume matters and volume on exotic items is never going to 
happen.

So what to do:

1) Off to eBay
2) Spend a fortune on the legit part
3) Make your own 

There is not a lot to an un-compensated crystal oscillator. Tuning it on 
frequency is fairly simple. Even for odd 
frequencies Mouser will happily sell you a crystal for next to nothing. Toss in 
a handful of parts and you have 
a very respectable oscillator. For a basement project … much better than 
spending $40 on something suspect 
from who knows who.

Bob




 On Aug 23, 2015, at 6:07 PM, Bill Byrom t...@radio.sent.com wrote:
 
 I can't imagine that anyone would trust some 0.1 ppm specification
 just because an unknown party stamped that on the case. There are many
 sellers of very similarly marked oscillators. They all are selling in
 single quantities for about the same price. The market seems to be
 hobbyists, especially audio fanatics who want to reduce the jitter in
 their audio gear. Since no reputable manufacturer would purchase such
 gray market parts with zero reputation (no known manufacturer of the
 item), nobody will be performing incoming inspection on these devices.
 So nobody knows what they are getting - if they install it and it isn't
 on frequency how would the buyer know what was wrong?
 
 Notice that there does not appear to be a Vanguard oscillator company
 or trade name used by some other manufacturer. The units are not marked
 with a model number. There is no real datasheet or specifications. There
 is no description of what the 0.1 ppm refers to, but it's printed
 right there on the case so it appears to be an attempt to give the
 product some type of quality.
 
 The obviously flouting of eBay and international customs regulations
 also shows the lack of trust you should have in that seller.
 Shipping invoice will be declared with low value and mark as 'gift' or
 'samples'
 
 See the eBay rules:
 http://pages.ebay.com/help/pay/international-shipping-rules.html
 Note: It's illegal to falsify customs declarations or mark an item as
 a gift in order to avoid customs fees. If a buyer asks you to commit
 customs fraud, report it to us.
 
 If the seller is faking custom forms, how do you know that anything they
 say is true?
 --
 Bill Byrom N5BB
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread David

 The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it.

BUT its seems to be the same spec on all irrespective of carrier 
frequency which goes from to 6MHz to 100MHz, with similar design the 
time jitter may be somewhat similar but I'd be astonished if the phase 
noise was common to all (implying grossly different time jitter). In 
addition, the package would worry me, 4 pins all with a glass seal, I 
want the ground pin to be directly connected to the case to minimise 
ground inductance leading to issues like injection locking. I'd assume 
these are cheap and cheerful clock oscillators, similar can be bought 
with a known brand label and spec from Digikey etc for less $.


David
---

Message: 14
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:33:59 -0400
From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
To: gandal...@aol.com, Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator
Message-ID: 86abcf10-fc65-4713-b286-bdc3e33fe...@n1k.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi

A few things I would wonder about:

1) Is it 0.1 ppm over 0 to 50C (or some other range)? If not, what is the 
temperature stability?
2) Does it run at 3.3V -or- at 5V (pick one) or do they run equally well at 
either voltage?
3) Since there is no EFC, is 0.1 ppm the set tolerance? If it’s not, what is 
the initial accuracy?

Lots of questions, there’s not much information there. That may be due to the 
seller not
having the information. It also may just be because nobody ever asked. The term 
TCXO can
mean a variety of things to a different people ….

The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it.

Bob


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Running voltages through MVAR (In re: HP5065)

2015-08-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

In message 85E3D5A82F314700BCA6493EEF245CCF@pc52, Tom Van Baak writes:

1) The scale is more intuitive, I find, when sqrt is used -- so I'm curious 
why you chose MVAR instead of MDEV?

Actually the plot is MDEV now that I think of it...

I've added a footnote.

2) When plots mostly head down with a -1 slope, consider TDEV
instead of MDEV, which effectively rotates by 45 degrees turning
-1 slopes into 0 slopes. For some kinds of data a rise above a
normal (zero) slope is more informative than a bend of a steep -1
line. Psychologically too, it removes the
things are working better and better as time goes on impression
that happens with a -1 slope, e.g., when ADEV is used on data from
a locked loop.

Good point.

3) Before you settle on MDEV, also try ADEV. There are cases where
the massive averaging inside of MDEV ruins interesting noise periodics

I generally hunt periodics with FFTs, but yes, ADEV is useful for the
sort of almost has a stable frequency like HVAC's turning on/off etc.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Gary Woods
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:13:47 -0400, you wrote:

Thanks for your comments and I did wonder about the plating,

This looks like the same package the Chinese are selling for the Kenwood
TS-590 to upgrade the already good internal timebase.  The reports on them
are pretty good, though few have an environmental chamber to see what the
compensation really does.  The plating seems to cost extra.
I got a break on a genuine Kenwood one, and it holds quite well in a pretty
uniform cellar ham shack.  When last I checked, it was about 4Hz off 10MHz
WWV; not enough to take off the bottom cover and tweak.

-- 
Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/4 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If all the spec’s on it are lies, then of course they don’t help much at all. I 
have 
not contacted the seller with any questions. I have no idea if there is more 
data
on the parts or not. Some parts from other sellers with very similar markings 
have
quite good paper specs associated with them. 

There are technologies that have been used on similar products over the years 
that result 
in parts that do not meet that phase noise spec at any point in the frequency 
range from 
6 to 100 MHz. Those are the parts that you probably don’t want to use on 
your DDS clock. 

The spec he states is quite do-able over that range without a  lot of effort on 
an XO. 
Who knows if he meets it or not. I certainly know of no reason why he could not 
do so.
He might exceed the spec by quite a bit at one end …

The header production process is a fraction of a cent cheaper if you use all 
glass seals
than if you weld one of the leads. In that case, you simply hand weld a ground 
onto the 
base. A bit ugly, but they save money. Inductance wise, not much difference. 
It’s miles ahead
of any of the modern ceramic packages in terms of shielding either way. 

Bob

 On Aug 23, 2015, at 2:55 PM, David t_list_1_o...@braw.co.uk wrote:
 
  The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it.
 
 BUT its seems to be the same spec on all irrespective of carrier frequency 
 which goes from to 6MHz to 100MHz, with similar design the time jitter may be 
 somewhat similar but I'd be astonished if the phase noise was common to all 
 (implying grossly different time jitter). In addition, the package would 
 worry me, 4 pins all with a glass seal, I want the ground pin to be directly 
 connected to the case to minimise ground inductance leading to issues like 
 injection locking. I'd assume these are cheap and cheerful clock oscillators, 
 similar can be bought with a known brand label and spec from Digikey etc for 
 less $.
 
 David
 ---
 
 Message: 14
 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:33:59 -0400
 From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
 To: gandal...@aol.com, Discussion of precise time and frequency
   measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator
 Message-ID: 86abcf10-fc65-4713-b286-bdc3e33fe...@n1k.org
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 
 Hi
 
 A few things I would wonder about:
 
 1) Is it 0.1 ppm over 0 to 50C (or some other range)? If not, what is the 
 temperature stability?
 2) Does it run at 3.3V -or- at 5V (pick one) or do they run equally well at 
 either voltage?
 3) Since there is no EFC, is 0.1 ppm the set tolerance? If it’s not, what is 
 the initial accuracy?
 
 Lots of questions, there’s not much information there. That may be due to the 
 seller not
 having the information. It also may just be because nobody ever asked. The 
 term TCXO can
 mean a variety of things to a different people ….
 
 The most encouraging thing is that there *is* a phase noise spec on it.
 
 Bob
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vanguard Ultra precision Golden Oscillator

2015-08-23 Thread Hal Murray

kb...@n1k.org said:
 There is not a lot to an un-compensated crystal oscillator. Tuning it on
 frequency is fairly simple. Even for odd  frequencies Mouser will happily
 sell you a crystal for next to nothing. Toss in a handful of parts and you
 have a very respectable oscillator. For a basement project … much better
 than spending $40 on something suspect from who knows who.

What's magic about a crystal as compared to an osc?  Is it really easier to 
get an odd-ball frequency in a crystal vs an osc?

The last time I bought a special frequency osc was over 10 years ago.  Once I 
found the right company, things were simple.  I don't remember the price.  At 
the time, it seemed reasonable, but that was for a commercial project rather 
than a basement lab.

Do those companies still exist or have they all fallen through the cracks of 
higher volumes and lower prices.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.