I always wandering about that "amoj" logo. Some time ago I got
Oscilloquarz 8663 OCXO soldered to PCB with this logo. It has two sinus
and two square outputs, basic power supply and trimmer to change the
frequency. I could be wrong, but my impression is: the company creating
useful items
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Last time I checked Trimble and uBlox were separate outfits. If a gizmo
> puts out
> uBlox messages, it’s tough to believe it’s a genuine Trimble device.
>
Ah, Bob's eye for detail. I used to have one of those.
This unit
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>
> And, if you have a couple of 422 devices, consider the economics of a 4-port
> unit like:
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/301881123530
As promised, I am reporting on the USR-N540, 4-serial-port to Ethernet
box that Tom
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Paul wrote:
> I got one of these:
The GPSDO has been claimed.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and
Hmm not to dissuade you from selling, but have you 'scoped the PPS on the
RS-232/SMA outputs? My guess is you are seeing a very narrow pulse (uSecs) and
need a pulse stretcher to actually do something like light a LED with it.
Looks to be a nicely packaged unit.
Dave
-Original
They actually determine the phase offset and rate of change of phase (i..e.
frequency offset and not frequency drift as claimed in the paper) from a linear
regression fit to a sequence of phase differences.
The results from the regression fit are then used in an adaptive PID loop.
Bruce
On
> I'm still not certain when exactly the DST bits are first flipped by WWVB,
> which I'd be curious to know.
Hi Hank,
It may be confusing to use the word "flipped" here -- because the algorithm is
more complicated than a light switch or binary "DST or not DST". There are
2-bits and 4 states
Hi
Last time I checked Trimble and uBlox were separate outfits. If a gizmo puts
out
uBlox messages, it’s tough to believe it’s a genuine Trimble device.
Bob
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Paul wrote:
>
> I got one of these:
>
>
I've been recording the WWVB timecode output from a salvaged walmart
clock module, so I examined the recent changes at bits 57 and 58.
Looks like they got it exactly right. Here's the minute before and after.
Midnight Saturday (UTC), they turned on bit 57 to indicate DST begins Sunday:
Sat
Hopefully, they will have installed the U.FL connector on the WiFi board so
that you can install the antenna outside the enclosure with a short coax cable.
Besides, it's low power ;)
Didier KO4BB
On March 15, 2016 2:10:21 PM CDT, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>In
I got one of these:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Trimble-GPS-Receiver-GPSDO-10MHz-1PPS-GPS-Disciplined-Clock-with-rs232-port-/252162780444
but the PPS output is bad. Funny becaue the PPS LED is working just fine.
The 10MHz looks okay (the counter says 10MHz with a Fury ext-in). This
unit emits a
My understanding of the article was that although fairly simple control
techniques such as PID were used, their innovation was to determine what
function the loop was performing, (initial lock, stability, and transition
from one to the other) and to choose a set of constants for loop control
Just for fun, I was created the chart for 60hz main behaviour for the
night when we had EST to EDT time switch.
Its 2AM EST, Mar 13. Which is, I beleive 6AM UTC. I was surprised I
noticed the event when I created spline smooth line for the data
http://www.patoka.ca/OCXO/60hz-est2edt.png
May
Nick, Andy,
There are hundreds of different WWVB RC clocks & watches, made by dozens of
companies over the years. It turns out that many do not handle DST, leap
seconds, or other boundary cases perfectly. I've never seen the problem caused
by WWVB itself, though poor reception can contribute
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:56:42 -0400
Jim Harman wrote:
Disclaimer: Control theory is not my strongest topic. I am pretty sure
that what I have written here is correct. But if anyone finds any
mistakes, please correct me.
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Lars Walenius
Ed,
On 03/14/2016 10:10 PM, Ed Palmer wrote:
Does anyone have any info on the Symmetricom SA.35M Miniature Rb
Standard? I have the data sheet, patent document and the MACDEMO
program. Is there anything else available? For example, I'd like some
more explanation of the various parameters read
In message
, Pete Lancashire writes:
>http://linuxgizmos.com/beefed-up-beaglebone-black-clone-launches-on-indiegogo/
I'm not sure I'd want a WLAN transmitter inside my 5370...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
http://linuxgizmos.com/beefed-up-beaglebone-black-clone-launches-on-indiegogo/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Well, they flip the “warning” bit at 0h UTC (4PM PST the afternoon before), so
I think the explanation is that my clock was able to sync up at that time, and
it reacted to the warning bit rather than using that as a cue to make the
change at 0200J like it should have. Either that, or the
I have seen no national timelab using cheap L1 stuff for high quality time
transfer.
Btw... its been discussed here multiple times over the years. Ashtech Z12-T and
fast forward over the past 20years. Look at a geodetic receiver with optional
external freq input. They are available from most
Hal,
One point being missed here is that when you get to high-end, dual-frequency
(L1/L2), carrier-phase GPS there's often less need for real-time results. The
receivers are run more in a data logging mode. Many sites collect data
continuously and then apply GPS corrections hours to days
In message <20160315031836.0f5b3406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>, Hal Mu
rray writes:
>Tom Clark and Rick Hambly work on timing for VLBI. [...] They use low
>cost L1 gear.
The crux of this seems to be that getting better time information out
of multiple bands *in real time* is
My unit was produced in Aug. 2010 so I don't think warranty is an
option. Besides, they'd take a dim view of me removing the top! :)
Ed
On 2016-03-14 9:01 PM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:
From: Bob Camp
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Yes, what I meant by "switch to DST" was that it flips the DST bit.
Not that the timecode itself changes.
Since the time many clocks use to sync up with WWVB is (from what I
recall) around 2AM, it seems kind of dicey whether they would make the
change on the right day.
I think that doesn't
24 matches
Mail list logo