Versions past 8.16 no longer run on XP. For versions 7 (and earlier) Ublox
only offered a Windows downloader program to download the actual program. That
was what I ran into earlier. I just downloaded the 8.16 version and it does
work under XP and does not need a net connection.
BTW, the
So, having a batch of PIC12F675's to play with the picDIV's with, but
being lazy I decided to look for a dev board for the 8 pin PIC's.
(Yeah, I know how lazy can you get! :) ) Just didn't feel like wiring
up the programming header to a bread board, etc. Anyway, one appeared
in google on OSH
FYI, u-center works fine in Wine. It also works (and installs)
perfectly in a Windows VM without any network access. So I don't know
what problem you're having, but I don't think it's caused by ublox.
On 1 June 2016 at 14:02, Mark Sims wrote:
> I have no idea... I can't run
I have no idea... I can't run Ucenter. It requires an internet connection to
run (or at least register). All my current Windoze boxes are XP, and there's
no way in hell I'm connecting an XP box to the internet. Other GPS makers
don't have such a requirement to use their software, so I
On 6/1/16 8:45 AM, Sherman, Jeffrey A. (Fed) wrote:
Jim Lux:
If you pick the right USRP models, you can lock the sampling clocks
together or distribute the clock. I don't know if that distribution is
sufficiently high quality for time-nuts kinds of applications.
A bit of extra detail related
Jim Lux:
If you pick the right USRP models, you can lock the sampling clocks
together or distribute the clock. I don't know if that distribution is
sufficiently high quality for time-nuts kinds of applications.
A bit of extra detail related to this but not reported in print... The N210 has
two
Atilla Kinali:
Yes, the spec'ed SNR of the ADS62P44 is 74dBFS (typ) while the LTC2216
is spec'ed with 81dBFS (typ). Additionally, the input amplitudes in
Sherman and Jördens experiments were kept around half scale, which is
another -6dB in SNR. There is another ~15dB in difference, but I currently
On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:52 -0500
"Bud Patten" wrote:
> Back in the spring of 2012 an article was published in VHF Communications
> entitled "A Phase Meter: a help to synchronize oscillator's to GPSDO". In
> it the authors indicated that they hoped to add a
Hal, thanks for reminding me of what I ran into on the LEA-6T modules. When
you first power them on, they are often a second off in time. It's not until
the NAV-TIMEUTC->valid field returns a set validUTC flag that the time can be
counted on. But it usually doesn't take more than a minute or
hol...@hotmail.com said:
> The receiver is reporting the correct UTC offset and appears to be working
> properly... it's just that the time is one second off from what 7 other
> models of receivers are reporting...
I'm pretty sure that I've seen one GPS unit that was off by a second. I'm
The local clock bias value reported by the Res T is the difference between
the receiver's clock and the reference time scale ( GPS or UTC). You need
it to correct the raw pseudo ranges reported by the receiver, which are
with respect to the receiver's clock.
Cheers
Michael
On Wednesday, 1 June
11 matches
Mail list logo