Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
So, I happen to have a full low-volume SMD assembly line here... for our own products (although I did have similar thoughts to John about spinning a couple of carrier boards for these type of parts but designed so they are suitable for assembly on our line). Our take on QFN's is that they're not a

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread David fav
I used to do SMTIf the solder paste does not absorb moisture when stored it should be OK People have had success with an iron frying pan on the stove . I have used a hot air paint stripper gun with a metal funnel to re flow the paste. There cheap SMT re work stations on Alibaba now <$100 O

[time-nuts] power supply design Re: Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, > ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 7:17 PM, Joseph Gwinn wrote: On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:13:44 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote: Message: 2 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:16:59 -0500 From: John Ackermann N8UR To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jit

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, > ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Joseph Gwinn
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:13:44 -0500, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote: > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:16:59 -0500 > From: John Ackermann N8UR > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, > ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block? > Messa

[time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Mark Sims
I'm using a toaster oven I got from Walmart. It said it was 1500 watts on the box, but is actually 1800 watts. It has two sets if heating elements. I didn't insulate it at all and am only using one set of elements... 900 watts. It hits my PbSn curve quite well. When the heat cycle is done,

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 3:28 PM, Ronald Held wrote: Jim; No need to order in the spring or fall anymore? Looking forward to your data. Ronald you and me, and a bunch of other folks as well ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread J. Grizzard
Can anybody comment on the toaster oven approach? Is it practical for things like this? How much does a solder mask cost? How much other stuff do I need? Does the solder paste need to be refrigerated and other quirks like that? What are the chances of a newbie getting a 44-QFN right on the

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Ronald Held
Jim; No need to order in the spring or fall anymore? Looking forward to your data. Ronald no kidding - there's a well known issue when MicroSemi took over building CSACs from Symmetricom, these things (like many precision timing widgets) have a "recipe" and it's easy to "lose the recipe"

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi > On Jan 25, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Ronald Held wrote: > > Nigel; > Will read the PDF carefully. > Ronald > > > "if it runs for years (or even months)" sounds like an informed comment:-) > > When searching for some data recently I came across a report which > might be relevant. > > "A

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Ronald Held
Nigel; Will read the PDF carefully. Ronald "if it runs for years (or even months)" sounds like an informed comment:-) When searching for some data recently I came across a report which might be relevant. "A Second Look at Chip Scale Atomic Clocks for Long Term Precision Timing", writt

[time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Mark Sims
OSHSTENCILS.COM sells stencils by the square inch. They have 4 mil stainless, 3 mil Kapton, and 5 mil Kapton... I usually use the stainless ones.They also sell syringes of solder paste. I keep mine in the fridge.I have year old paste that works fine. There are now pastes that do not

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Mark Goldberg
I have had very good luck with a converted toaster oven, GC-10 solder paste, and OSH Stencils metal stencils. Basically, if the temperature profile is good and you have good solder paste application, decent placement, good solder mask and correct pad sizes, everything solders itself. I have built 7

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 1:18 PM, Hal Murray wrote: lajeune...@mail.com said: I'm sure you know the 1.8V supply regulators should not be fed from VDDA (3.3V), but I'll mention it anyway. usually, it's so that noise coupled back from the part doesn't back in through the 1.8V. If you have a (say) 5V suppl

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi You can mod toaster ovens, they work ok, EEVB has *lots* of info on that. When you buy your PCB you can get solder stencils at the same time. Bought as a package they are in the $10 or so range. Without buying the boards with them, I’m sure the price goes up a bit. The metal ones are a bit m

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Hal Murray
lajeune...@mail.com said: > Any non-zero output impedance and the digital load changes enter back in as > noise on what should be the quiet VDDA. Thanks. I missed the "A" on the VDDA. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailin

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Hal Murray
j...@febo.com said: > The challenge is that the chip is a 7x7 mm 44-QFN package and really wants > to be put on a six-layer circuit board. That's doable, but challenging, > for home assembly. Can anybody comment on the toaster oven approach? Is it practical for things like this? How much do

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Chris Caudle
On Thu, January 25, 2018 3:08 pm, Robert LaJeunesse wrote: > but I'll second Bill's section about including the power > supply voltage regulator and bypassing. Many of the SiLabs devices have on chip regulators, some of those may be worth investigating. -- Chris Caudle

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
The problem comes if the load current on the 1.8V regulator sees significant ups and downs. Think output regulator in particular. Might also happen with the digital core if major rollovers align and the core spikes. Those current changes get spread (admittedly reduced, too) by the bypass caps, r

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Hal Murray
lajeune...@mail.com said: > I'm sure you know the 1.8V supply regulators should not be fed from VDDA > (3.3V), but I'll mention it anyway. Why not? That sounds like the sort of issue I should understand but I'm coming up blank. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Yes, I was planning to include bypasses, and I've been convinced to put at least the 1.8V regulator on the board as well. And to think about the interconnects. Adding the crystal does make the layout more complex -- they put a ground pour on its own layer underneath it, and I think (but am no

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Robert LaJeunesse
John, I appreciate your minimalist goal, but I'll second Bill's section about including the power supply voltage regulator and bypassing. Finding a good regulator with wideband line regulation/rejection could prove a real search, and such a fast chip as the Si5340 will need excellent broadband s

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Things have to get pretty deep to be fully isolated from the seasons down to the “digits past the decimal” level. It *does* bring up an interesting place to set up your temperature stabilized timing lab though. The commute back and forth might be a bit of a chore :) Bob > On Jan 25, 2018,

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 12:12 PM, wb6bnq wrote: Hi John, Thanks for the response.  Here is my 2 cents: Well, due to the level of difficulty in chip mounting, I would prefer to see a complete project. I.E., power supply for a single input of 12 volts and regulators the necessary chip values, proper input p

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 11:20 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi One of the unique features of underwater timing is that the sea bottom temperature (once you get well away from a coastline) is *very* stable. In some deployments, the “random” nature of ambient temperature that we fight all the time in the rest of the

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Just to be clear, the current data sheet has the temperature range back to -10 to +70C. They most certainly had a major headache on their hands for several years straightening things out. I have not seen any complaints about the “new” (post rework) version of the part. Bob > On Jan 25, 2018

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread jimlux
On 1/25/18 9:39 AM, gandalfg8--- via time-nuts wrote: At the time of writing a copy is available here www.obsip.org/documents/Gardner_IEEE_Oceans_2016.pdf "While results from an early batch of CSACs have been largely positive, later units have not performed as well. The CSAC specifica

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Hi Bill -- And that's exactly what I *don't* want to do. :-) The reason is that I have several different projects in mind (and everyone else will have their own requirements) and only want to deal with the difficult package once. The idea is to make a minimal carrier to deal with the tiny p

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread wb6bnq
Hi John, Thanks for the response. Here is my 2 cents: Well, due to the level of difficulty in chip mounting, I would prefer to see a complete project. I.E., power supply for a single input of 12 volts and regulators the necessary chip values, proper input protection for the 10 MHz input leve

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Hi Bill -- I should have been more clear: this design will be for a simple case: one reference clock input, four outputs. The chip can do all sorts of fancy tricks, but I'm looking for a source of four low jitter outputs derived from a 10 MHz external reference (not using crystal or on-board

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi One of the unique features of underwater timing is that the sea bottom temperature (once you get well away from a coastline) is *very* stable. In some deployments, the “random” nature of ambient temperature that we fight all the time in the rest of the world, simply is not present. The devic

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi > On Jan 25, 2018, at 2:02 PM, wb6bnq wrote: > > Hi John, > > After looking at the data sheet, it seems way more involved then just making > a carrier board for it. Besides the power supply requirements, various > design selections would dictate different circuit layouts for different >

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Tom Van Baak
> www.obsip.org/documents/Gardner_IEEE_Oceans_2016.pdf Also see the very nice presentation: "Challenges of precise timing underwater" http://www.ipgp.fr/~crawford/2017_EuroOBS_workshop/Resources/Gardner_OBS_Timing_ATG_20150427.pdf /tvb ___ time-nuts ma

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi > On Jan 25, 2018, at 12:39 PM, gandalfg8--- via time-nuts > wrote: > > > > Hi > > The CSAC spec sheet calls out an aging rate of 0.9 ppb per month as > “typical”. There is also a temperature spec of 0.4 ppb. If both are correct > for your sample (*and* aging is linear ) you would be ou

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread wb6bnq
Hi John, After looking at the data sheet, it seems way more involved then just making a carrier board for it. Besides the power supply requirements, various design selections would dictate different circuit layouts for different purposes. Even trying to do a general purpose application woul

Re: [time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread Tim Shoppa
That's a wonderful paper by those Woods Hole guys. Their temperature-compensated 5 milliwatt crystal oscillators can be back-corrected (linear drift model) to a few tens of milliseconds over a year and they make a convincing case they know how to do this. Their similar graphs for CSAC oscillators

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Mark Goldberg
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:32 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > After the recent discussion about Silicon Labs clock generators, I looked at their Si5340A part and think it will be useful for a ham radio project I'm working on. Have you considered the Si5340-EVB development board? https://octopa

Re: [time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:32:56 -0500 John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > http://www.silabs.com/documents/public/data-sheets/Si5341-40-D-DataSheet.pdf > > The challenge is that the chip is a 7x7 mm 44-QFN package and really > wants to be put on a six-layer circuit board. That's doable, but > challeng

[time-nuts] CSAC Project(was CSAC purchase)

2018-01-25 Thread gandalfg8--- via time-nuts
Hi The CSAC spec sheet calls out an aging rate of 0.9 ppb per month as “typical”. There is also a temperature spec of 0.4 ppb. If both are correct for your sample (*and* aging is linear ) you would be out by roughly 10 ppb per year. There also is a voltage stability spec that might be impacted

Re: [time-nuts] Phase noise in stable 32

2018-01-25 Thread Anders Wallin
For AllanTools and other testing I have tried the FFT plots in Stable32. It seems to use a fairly simple FFT which has problems for divergent noise-types. The Welch algorithm is better for these. The x-axis should end at the Nyquist frequency, i.e. half of your data rate. For meaningful phase-noise

[time-nuts] Slightly OT: interest in a four-output, ultra-low jitter, synthesizer block?

2018-01-25 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
After the recent discussion about Silicon Labs clock generators, I looked at their Si5340A part and think it will be useful for a ham radio project I'm working on. While it can do other things, for my use it would use a 10 MHz input clock and generate 4 independent outputs in the range of 100