our
constraints diverge from
your constraints, the further off base our advice and answers will be.
I appreciate that. I came here with a narrow question in mind, but perhaps it
wasn’t the correct one.
Bob
On Aug 16, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
is it?
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:14:34 -0700
Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
Without having had a look at your code (sorry, i currently don't have
the time for this), if you trully implemented just an FLL, then this
is where you should start from. The way to get a PLL is to let
On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:14:34 -0700
Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
Without having had a look at your code (sorry, i currently don't have
the time for this), if you trully implemented just an FLL
://www.ke5fx.com/timelab/readme.htm).
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 11:47 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] I've designed a GPSDO, but how good is it?
I’ve designed and make and sell a GPSDO
On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:47:23 -0700
Nick Sayer via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
I’ve designed and make and sell a GPSDO on Tindie
(https://hackaday.io/ project/6872-gps-disciplined-tcxo). It’s brand new -
I’ve
I’ve designed and make and sell a GPSDO on Tindie
(https://hackaday.io/project/6872-gps-disciplined-tcxo). It’s brand new - I’ve
sold a handful of them so far. So as to make this post not *entirely*
self-serving, what I would like is some further guidance on how I can better
characterize its
On Aug 16, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:
Anyway, to answer your question -- to measure its true performance you only
need two things. 1) a phase meter (or time interval counter) that's good to 1
ns or better, and 2) a local reference standard that's maybe 10x
201 - 207 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
