rver to monitor that PPS input but not use it in the clock monkeying
algorithm, and then compare what NTP reports for the local clock with what it
reports for other NTP peers.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- t
and output file that happen to
contain them.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
Anders Wallin <anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com> wrote on Wed, 20 Dec 2017
at 13:51:21 +0200 in
I would have thought the easy test is to run the GPSDO on battery power
(perhaps with a UPS). Maybe that's not so easy?
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin
three
services, that makes them harder to spoof (beyond checking the services against
each other)?
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time
his, but it does happen (esp. on time-nus). And many GPS
receivers can be convinced to display GPS system time.
So, please don't say "GPS time," because it is ambiguous. But please also don't
suggest that when people say "GPS time" they must mean "GPS system time,
yone who wants to tinker with ntp under OS X.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Chris Albertson wrote on Fri, 17 Mar 2017
at 14:38:17 -0700 in
given phone from day to day. And if your threshold is
something like half a second, you might think your phone is always
good enough, and then have a rude awakening (I did!) when one day it's
off by >1 second.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts
es not seem to be working. Consumer wifi driver problems are manifestly
inappropriate for this list, and trying to do both at once leads to gross
confusion :( I know this is my personal opinion and I don't speak with any
authority.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
Bob Camp <kb...@n1k.org&g
is your application here? You haven't made it clear. Ping is
not representative of what you could get with a wifi using a new
technology, which was what was how this thread started, and so the
context some of the anwers (esp. mine) are in. Ping is representative
of other things, thou
ct: don't trust pings to switches, but
pings to idle hosts will be much more meaningful. But still not meaningful
on wireless networks.
So...can we please stop talking about pings? Thanks.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list
quipment, too.] If you're not designing from the ground-up, then it makes
a lot of sense.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
#motorized-louvers/=14s2pox
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote on Fri, 22 Jul 2016
at 15:14:26 -0700 in <60BA6696E49A4C4FA9F6B5792176F81A@pc52>:
> > The current algorithm on the server uses the UT1 offset from
> > Circular A with no interpolation. The value changes a
S Message list
that NIST's UT1 ntp-based time service would be open access beginning
in July 2016. Announcement reproduced below.
I found your email fairly confusing.
--jh...@mit.edu
John Hawkinson
Message-ID: <25948628.481467094028650.javamail.cmad...@gsb50ml1.ffm.web>
Date: Tue,
15 matches
Mail list logo