[time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Loïc Moreau
Hi,
My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
ear plugs fast.

If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will be 
interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.

Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Loïc Moreau
Following your comments, i have opened the enclosure, disconnected the power 
supply and measured  the fan current ( 40mA) when connected to AC line.

Ordered a 4020 model 12V with the proper current, seems very common

My 53132A will be back on stage very soon 

Thanks for your help. 

Regards 
Loïc
   

-Message d'origine-
De : time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part de Bob Camp
Envoyé : dimanche 11 janvier 2015 15:22
À : Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

Hi

A very normal “spiral of death” on the 53132 is the fan going out and the power 
supply following it a month or two later. The supply apparently does need the 
fan cooling to keep it happy. Since the fan runs whenever the counter is 
plugged in, the fan logs a lot of hours. If you do loose the power supply, the 
one in the 53181 will swap over to the 132. It’s not a cheap fix, but better 
than scrapping a 132.

Bob

 On Jan 11, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Loïc Moreau loic.mor...@eai.fr wrote:
 
 Hi,
 My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
 ear plugs fast.
 
 If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will 
 be interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.
 
 Regards
 Loïc
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] LNA and Alias

2014-12-26 Thread Loïc Moreau
Hi,

I have just found the culprit 

The AD7760 eval board in charge of the ADC task, is equipped with a little 40 
MHz clock witch seems to generate a beat note with my 10Mhz noise measurements 
setup. I have discovered the origin of the problem after disconnecting the LNA 
from the  measurement chain and visualizing the output of the LNA with a scope.

The beat note was clearly visible, 10mV peak-peak . After shutting down every 
10Mhz sources in my lab (a huge task) and altering the frequency of my phase 
noise measurement setup noise floor, I noticed that the low frequency noise was 
in fact a beat note following the ref frequency adjustments. ( The ref OCXO was 
replaced with a 33521A to alter amplitude and frequency at will) . 

As soon as I fire up the 7.5V power supply of the eval AD7760  (the eval card 
is not connected to anything). the LNA give a steady 10mV beat note as the 40 
MHz clock seems mixing up somewhere a few herz apart from the regular source, 
polluting the close in phase noise measurements .

So after weeks of questioning, I was a bit disappointed to find out that the AD 
eval board, the least suspected item was at the origin of the problem. 

  Now, I have to address it . I have noticed the presence of smb connectors on 
the eval card, so I may substitute the internal clock, and a shield enclosure 
may cure that little beast.  At last DC power supply wires may also be 
substituted by shielded cable  just in case.  

I am relieved 

Regards.
Loïc


-Message d'origine-
De : time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part de Bruce Griffiths
Envoyé : lundi 22 décembre 2014 20:30
À : Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] LNA and Alias

On Monday, December 22, 2014 09:26:15 AM Loïc wrote:
 Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffiths@... writes:
  Are you sure that the setup is aligned to minimise AM response?
  
  Are you using cross-correlation?
  Bruce
  
   On Monday, 22 December 2014 5:08 PM, Loïc Moreau loic.moreau
at
 
 eai..fr wrote:
   Hi all,
  
  My phase noise measurements system give erroneous  results in close
in
 
 phase noise measurements, I got
 
  humps in the 1Hz-1000Hz area as high à 20 dB more than expected.
  
  The setup is using a mixer to compare reference and DUT witch drive
an LNA
  http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/LowNoiseMixerPreamp.html , the output
is
 
 driving an AD7760 ADC and an op
 
  amp circuity is connected to the VFC reference to achieve quadrature. 
The
 
 results are analyzed with an
 
  homebrew FFT charting software
  
  After struggling with different configurations, switched different 
  LNA,
 
 ADC , sound card. A scope
 
  connected to the LNA output indicate steady 20MHz residuals just
before
 
 the ADC ( around 10 mv peak-peak).
 
  In fact , it seems that the mixer 20Mhz residuals ( DUT + REF  ) are
 
 entering the ADC and so theses alias  give
 
  erroneous results in the 1Hz-100Hz area, displaying unexpected
 
 artifacts. In order to fix the problem
 
  I will probably include an analog filter just before the ADC input 
  (same
 
 as LNA input  1nF 80µH), but I
 
  want to know if some more sophisticated measures should be
undertaken as
 
 an 5th Order Lowpass Filter.
 
  I have not found many clue about  alias problems in phase noise
 
 measurements  literature so I may have
 
  missed something ?
  
  Any advice
  
  Loïc
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@...
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-
 nuts
 
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 Hi,
 
 I have a simple setup to measure the noise floor, the mixer is a SYM-2
and
 a divider is feeding RF and LO inputs ports for that purpose.
 


 a pi network give the 90° phase difference.
 
Have you measured the phase shift when connected to the mixer?
I usually use a narrowband  90 degree hybrid.
 
 The test is running with an HP 10811 giving around 7dBm, but i have 
 the same results with any sources, especially a  33521A witch can be
adjusted
 in level and frequency.
 
 
 I intend to use  cross-correlation later when i will be confident with 
 my the setup, for now i run a simple FFT.
 
 I have no clue about AM noise problem, i suppose that a sufficient 
 input level on LO will put that problem aside.
 
The phase shift between the RF and LO ports needs to be adjusted to minimise 
the response to AM in the source. To do this an AM modulator with low 
incidental PM is required. The phase is adjusted to minimise the sideband 
amplitude in the mixer output.
 
 by the way, I was a bit surprised that nobody pay any attention to RF 
 leakage from multiplier as the low frequency level is order or 
 magnitude lower than 20Mhz product present at the input.
 
Sufficient attenuation is usually achieved by using a well balanced mixer and 
by the mixer IF port termination and the low pass filter network between the 
mixer IF port and the low noise preamp

[time-nuts] LNA and Alias

2014-12-21 Thread Loïc Moreau
Hi all,

My phase noise measurements system give erroneous  results in close in phase 
noise measurements, I got humps in the 1Hz-1000Hz area as high à 20 dB more 
than expected.

The setup is using a mixer to compare reference and DUT witch drive an LNA 
http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/LowNoiseMixerPreamp.html , the output is driving an 
AD7760 ADC and an op amp circuity is connected to the VFC reference to achieve 
quadrature. The results are analyzed with an homebrew FFT charting software

After struggling with different configurations, switched different LNA, ADC , 
sound card. A scope connected to the LNA output indicate steady 20MHz residuals 
just before the ADC ( around 10 mv peak-peak).

In fact , it seems that the mixer 20Mhz residuals ( DUT + REF  ) are entering 
the ADC and so theses alias  give erroneous results in the 1Hz-100Hz area, 
displaying unexpected  artifacts. In order to fix the problem I will probably 
include an analog filter just before the ADC input (same as LNA input  1nF 
80µH), but I want to know if some more sophisticated measures should be 
undertaken as an 5th Order Lowpass Filter.

I have not found many clue about  alias problems in phase noise measurements  
literature so I may have missed something ?

Any advice

Loïc



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Close in frequency stability

2011-11-07 Thread Loïc MOREAU
Hi,

Here attached is a TBOLT screen shot, 

I am unable to go an ADEV @ 1s not better than 10-8 with timelab when I  am 
measuring a 10-134 10 MHz source, I suppose that it is due to the short term 
stability  of my TBOLT around 20 ppt rms with spikes coming up to 80 ppt .

Putting directly the output of my external 10MHz ref in the input of my 53132A 
counter  give some  variation of the 11 and 12 digits which is expected 
accordingly to PPS TBOLT span .  

I would like to know if I am at the limits of the TBOLT for close in stability 
measurements and if there is any way to improve that (may be I have missed 
something). 

Regards
Loïc

attachment: tbolt.gif___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] 8560E DC Coupling phase noise measurements

2011-10-26 Thread Loïc MOREAU
Thanks, everything is clear now.

 I will have a try with a pair of  Schottky diodes as 10 db give 3.16 
attenuation and so no enough for a +-15V rails , I want to be sure ;=) )
 
Regards
Loïc



-Message d'origine-
De : time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part 
de John Miles
Envoyé : mardi 25 octobre 2011 22:55
À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] 8560E DC Coupling phase noise measurements


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts- boun...@febo.com] 
 On Behalf Of Loïc MOREAU
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:01 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] 8560E DC Coupling phase noise measurements
 
 Hi,
 In the process of measuring phase noise with a 'demphano' gear,  I am 
 a
bit
 reluctant to connect  my 8560E in DC mode to get 30 Hz low frequency
 sensitivity:  the SA input is very sensitive to DC voltage and may  be 
 destroyed by a voltage larger than 200mV.
 
  So with a LNA having no blocking DC output I would like to know the 
 best way to protect the SA.
 
 I suppose that putting a 100µF capacitor between LNA and SA is not 
 especially a good idea as a charged capacitor to DC rail may have the 
 same effect that no caps at all.
 
 I am looking for some advice in that domain to pursue phase noise 
 measurements,  for now I connect the SA with a caution after PLL lock 
 and measuring the SA input with a DC voltmeter before switching to DC 
 SA input but this mode of operation is a bit frightening.
 
 Any idea ?

The 200 mV limit is only with 0 dB of RF attenuation.  With a quadrature PLL 
and LNA, you don't need to use 0 dB.  20 dB is probably OK, and if not, you can 
make up for it with more gain.

A pair of back-to-back Schottky diodes would be another alternative. 

-- john



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] 8560E DC Coupling phase noise measurements

2011-10-25 Thread Loïc MOREAU
Hi,
In the process of measuring phase noise with a 'demphano' gear,  I am a bit 
reluctant to connect  my 8560E in DC mode to get 30 Hz low frequency 
sensitivity:  the SA input is very sensitive to DC voltage and may  be  
destroyed by a voltage larger than 200mV.

 So with a LNA having no blocking DC output I would like to know the best way 
to protect the SA.

I suppose that putting a 100µF capacitor between LNA and SA is not especially a 
good idea as a charged capacitor to DC rail may have the same effect that no 
caps at all.

I am looking for some advice in that domain to pursue phase noise measurements, 
 for now I connect the SA with a caution after PLL lock and measuring the SA 
input with a DC voltmeter before switching to DC SA input  but this mode of 
operation is a bit frightening.

Any idea ?

Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] My old new 53132A just arrived

2010-08-09 Thread Loïc MOREAU
Hi all,

My first goal is to verify the frequency of my different RF sources : 4420B, 
some DDS, a N2PK VNA and  ISOTEMP 134-10, the next step with the help of an 
Excel spread sheet to have some idea about their respective stability.

Equipped with option 010, I would like to know how in which direction to go to 
calibrate my unit. The frequency of the internal time base is supposed to be 
stable but I have no way to know the exact frequency as the unit is an old one.

So I suppose I have to calibrate the gear with an external source, for now I 
can suppose that my 53132A is accurate to 10-6  or +-1Hz, as it is so easy to 
turn the front panel adjusting screw, I am not sure about the actual precision.

I can take two possible direction to improve my system with an external time 
base.   

1. acquire a rubidium 10Mhz, put in in a box with a 24V power supply 

Or 

2. acquire a 10Mhz GMS time unit or homebrew one with one of the numerous 
project that we can find.

Can somebody give an advice : I have no clue to choose between the solutions, 
apart the power drain of the first one. 

Regards
Loïc 

http://www.eai.fr




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] 5350A versus 53131A

2010-08-02 Thread Loïc MOREAU
In order to compare different frequency sources i am in the process to acquire 
old Agilent gear, i am looking to different directions   5350A counter or more 
modern 53131A the prices are nearly equals and I prefer more recent equipment 
so I somebody can give me an advice to look further on 5350A  it will be 
appreciated. 

The 225 Mhz frequency limit of the 53131 is not a problem as some equipment are 
equipped with a 3 Ghz option and it will be possible to construct/buy a 
prescaler. 

regards
Loïc


http://www.eai.fr






___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.