Good points, and You got 4 1/2 out of five correct, Not bad at all.
Ha ha - thank you teacher!
Fairy nuff, yes, your plots show the long-term effects. I would like
to know what the best time-constant is to use. I appreciate that
everyone's will be different, depending on individual
...@theiet.org
To: WarrenS warrensjmail-...@yahoo.com; Discussion of precise time and
frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tbolt Damping setting
Good points, and You got 4 1/2 out of five correct, Not bad at all.
Ha ha
Thank you for your explanation. Your Lady Heather plot prompts a
couple of questions though:
1) Presumably you created the 40ns phase step by changing the output
timing offset?
2) Presumably, again, the plotted data is from the self reported data
from the Thunderbolt?
I have been running a
Peter
and all,
Good points, and You got 4 1/2 out of five correct, Not bad at all.
#1) YES, The easy way I used to make the controlled phase error steps was by
entering a new number into the cable delay, which is limited to under 50ns
change.
#2) Yes, this is the self reported Tbolt data
