On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:07:24PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <875e4bc6-32c3-4724-afcd-086553ae5...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq writes:
>
> >Water wise, one might note the large piles of snow sitting on my antennas at
> >the moment. Yes, I
> >could go knock it off, but
Hi
They probably have a group of people on staff to go out and dry them off after
it rains …. :)
Indeed, there are a lot of pictures of heated enclosures for antennas. The
debate over the
dielectric properties of the coverings goes back a long way. There are notes in
the standard
databases
In message <875e4bc6-32c3-4724-afcd-086553ae5...@n1k.org>, Bob kb8tq writes:
>Water wise, one might note the large piles of snow sitting on my antennas at
>the moment. Yes, I
>could go knock it off, but somehow it just keeps coming back. Weird how winter
>works …. There
>is no perfect
Hi
It’s not the end stops that are the issue. It’s the wall of the pipe. If the
dimensions in
the sketch are roughly correct and you scale it to the dimensions of the eBay
antenna,
that is a big tall pipe. Indeed “nothing overhead” would mitigate part of the
issue. That magic
line runs
On 6 February 2018 at 03:33, John Green wrote:
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/High-Precision-L1-L2-GNSS-GPS-GLONA
> SS-BeiDou-RTK-CORS-survey-antenna/162718512935?ssPageNam
> e=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m2749.l2649
>
> Listed on eBay as a L1/L2 antenna with decent specs.
In message
That does represent a limiting case but it's a bit pessimistic. The longest
path is for very shallow incident angles eg a 3 mm thick and 150 mm radius
disk gives an angle of only about 1 degree. At 10 degrees, the path is
about 20 mm; with a refractive index of 1.5, the path is only 10 mm longer.
Hi
Since we are talking about an L1 / L2 antenna here, a reasonable assumption
would be that the target is something better than an “average result”. If you
construct
a cover out of a piece of PVC pipe (as shown in the original drawing), your
worst
case path has a foot or so of PVC in it
I can see why the geodetic community would worry about antenna phase centre
variation when a radome is installed but is it really an issue in timing
applications? The few papers I've read suggest PCVs of less than 10 mm, or
equivalently, 30 ps. This is at the level of precision available from
Hi
Indeed a radome may distort the antenna pattern. In teh case of DIY projects
the trick that most can apply is to take a piece of the radome material and put
it into a microwave own. If it doesn't get hot it is OK for most DIY cases.
Infinion have some nice GNSS MMICs e.g. BGA924N6
Hi
The microwave trick is fine for working out if it is a lossy material.
Unfortunately
what gets you in this case is more than just loss. A coax cable has core
material
that will (usually) do quite well in a microwave. None the less, the delay
through
the coax is different than through air
In a previous job, I used plastics to "lens" antennas at 2.4 GHz, shaping the
patterns for more desirable results.
XFDTD is a great software package for this application but it is expensive.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To
Hi
There are “cell site” specific GPS antennas on the market. Panasonic has had
one out
for quite a while. I’m sure there are several others.
One issue with doing any sort of “cover” for a precision antenna is distorting
it’s pattern.
Plastic (or whatever you use) will have different
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:54:23 -0500
Bob kb8tq wrote:
> One gotcha (if the data sheets are correct) is going to be the supply voltage.
> We normally stay away from 12V antennas because TBolt’s put out 5V. In the
> case of a survey antenna, 12V is what most of the gear puts out. I
Hi
One gotcha (if the data sheets are correct) is going to be the supply voltage.
We normally stay away from 12V antennas because TBolt’s put out 5V. In the
case of a survey antenna, 12V is what most of the gear puts out. I don’t know
of any L1 / L2 gear that puts out 5 rather than 12V ….
Bob
>
There's a picture of the guts in the ebay description...it's a dual
patch antenna!
the patches seem to be trimmed to get a pattern.
On 2018-02-05 20:33, John Green wrote:
oops, sorry for the misfire.
> I couldn't figure out how to get to the insides to take a peek
> without damaging it.
For $99 I would take the risk to damage it... Or find someone with x-ray gear
and have a peak inside. Or take it with you on your next plane flight and grab
a photo of the TSA
> testing. I couldn't figure out how to get to the insides to take a peek
> without damaging it. My antenna testing abilities are pretty feeble.
> Mostly, I will just compare it to the Leica and Trimble to see how many
> satellites it sees and look at position wander of the uBlox. Is there any
>
18 matches
Mail list logo