Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-08 Thread Lars Walenius
Some clarifications on the ADC in the ATmega328 and how it is used in the Arduino GPSDO. The resolution is 10 bits but you can select Vref. In my Arduino GPSDO it is set to the internal Vref = 1.1V so 1LSB is 1.1mV. From the beginning I used 5V as Vref but if you plot the response from the

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-08 Thread Jim Miller
: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:28:31 -0800 From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Message-ID: 20140308052831.40d3e406...@ip-64-139-1-69

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Jim Miller
I think the hardware delay line approach is the only solution for a simple D FF lead/lag phase comparator. It would be placed ahead of the FF. Which GPS being built now provide sawtooth info? 73 jim ab3cv ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Azelio Boriani
Every timing GPS receiver has the sawtooth information: uBlox, iLotus, SkyTraq, Trimble just to name someone. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I think the hardware delay line approach is the only solution for a simple D FF lead/lag phase comparator. It would

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Lars Walenius
As I am a poor programmer and also lazy (includes hardware and software), I would like to ask the following question: How much better would a GPSDO like the Arduino GPSDO be with added sawtooth correction? Let’s say we assume the 1ns resolution TIC is perfect, no jitter from the uP and the

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I think the hardware delay line approach is the only solution for a simple D FF lead/lag phase comparator. It would be placed ahead of the FF. Simple? You are going to need a micro controller and software to (1) tall the GPS

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Lars Walenius
I have quite often seen the simple D FF lead/lag phase comparator mentioned but not found any practical implementation in a GPSDO. Has anyone a schematic and hopefully real data? What is the performance? Is it better than a conventional GPSDO with a TIC+uP+DAC or is it only simpler? Lars On

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Jim Miller
in the uBlox u-Center software users guide. Thanks Jim ab3cv Message: 3 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 16:26:35 +0100 From: Azelio Boriani azelio.bori...@screen.it To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Hal Murray
j...@jtmiller.com said: I'm new at this obviously. I was just looking at the uBlox-6 info and I don't see where in the NMEA sentences the sawtooth info is contained. Is it a manufacturer specific option that needs be turned on? Or is it contained within a standard NMEA sentence somewhere. I

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Lars Walenius
Chris, about using one Arduino for two GPSDO controllers: Even if a microcontroller has lots of capacity I would recommend to use separate controllers for each oscillator. One of the reasons is what Tom van Baak said about using only one interrupt to avoid jitter and even if you trigger both

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I'm new at this obviously. I was just looking at the uBlox-6 info and I don't see where in the NMEA sentences the sawtooth info is contained. There is no NMEA sawthooth sentence. You typically have to put the serial data

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Lars Walenius lars.walen...@hotmail.com wrote: Chris, about using one Arduino for two GPSDO controllers: Even if a microcontroller has lots of capacity I would recommend to use separate controllers for each oscillator. One of the reasons is what Tom van Baak

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/7/14 12:31 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Lars Walenius lars.walen...@hotmail.com wrote: Chris, about using one Arduino for two GPSDO controllers: Even if a microcontroller has lots of capacity I would recommend to use separate controllers for each

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Paul
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I'm new at this obviously. I was just looking at the uBlox-6 info and I don't see where in the NMEA sentences the sawtooth info is contained. u-blox calls it (Time)Pulse Granularity (PG). You're looking for the UBX clock

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Hal Murray
jim...@earthlink.net said: for $20, it's hard to beat.. the only downside is that you can't go down to radio shack and buy one on the spur of the moment. At that price, you can keep a couple on the shelf. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You can put the LEA-5T or the LEA-6T into a mode where they put out the sawtooth information on auto pilot. Once you get it set up (which you do each time you boot) it just keeps going. You must have the T version of the modules to get the sawtooth out of them. Bob On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:10

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Chris Albertson
Let's see what is needed. The ADC is 10-bits so it can read to one part in 1024. It's a 5 volt full scale so we are only able to measure 5 millivolt increments The uP runs about 16 million instructions per second. What if we wait 1000 instructions to read the ADC what will the error be? The

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/7/14 3:33 PM, Chris Albertson wrote: Let's see what is needed. The ADC is 10-bits so it can read to one part in 1024. It's a 5 volt full scale so we are only able to measure 5 millivolt increments if you use the teensy3 it has a 16 bit ADC with realistically, about 13 bits

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi With a “real” 12 to 13 bit ADC and a 200 ns TDC pulse you would ideally get 200 / 4096 as your LSB. Nothing like this is ever perfect, so you probably aren’t going to get 50 ps. You probably will be below 100 ps. That’s plenty good enough to make sawtooth correction useful. Bob On

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
Hello David, Not sure what is wrong here - I still can't reach it. If it isn't too much trouble - can you send me a screen shot off-list - I can look up the patents as long as the numbers are listed. Thanks! John W. j...@westmorelandengineering.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, David J

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Paul
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: You must have the T version of the modules to get the sawtooth out of them. Per the documents (and M Tharp) you don't need a T model to get quantization correction (I only have a T so I don't have first-hand information). I

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Bob Camp
Hi On the 4’s and 5’s you only got a pulse + correction with the T model. Bob On Mar 7, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Paul tic-...@bodosom.net wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: You must have the T version of the modules to get the sawtooth out of them. Per the

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Paul
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: On the 4's and 5's you only got a pulse + correction with the T model. I have a 6T so I can only read the data sheets for the others but the OP said uBlox-6. Perhaps there are various firmware releases but the LEA-5 family is

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Jim Miller
publish a schematic, code and test results once I have something working. Thanks Jim ab3cv Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:23:54 -0800 From: Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 07/03/14 19:28, Lars Walenius wrote: Chris, about using one Arduino for two GPSDO controllers: Even if a microcontroller has lots of capacity I would recommend to use separate controllers for each oscillator. One of the reasons is what Tom van Baak said about using only one interrupt to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 08/03/14 00:52, Bob Camp wrote: Hi With a “real” 12 to 13 bit ADC and a 200 ns TDC pulse you would ideally get 200 / 4096 as your LSB. Nothing like this is ever perfect, so you probably aren’t going to get 50 ps. You probably will be below 100 ps. That’s plenty good enough to make

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread Hal Murray
j...@jtmiller.com said: I may switch the GPS module at a later date to one which provides sawtooth info if I really feel the need and add a delay line. Frankly I think I'll never get around to it. One nasty problem with hanging bridges is that if you don't believe in them, then you won't

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread David J Taylor
Hello David, Not sure what is wrong here - I still can't reach it. If it isn't too much trouble - can you send me a screen shot off-list - I can look up the patents as long as the numbers are listed. Thanks! John W. Screen-shot and page HTML

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-07 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
David, Thanks - got it. Best Regards, John W. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:53 PM, David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: Hello David, Not sure what is wrong here - I still can't reach it. If it isn't too much trouble - can you send me a screen shot off-list - I can look up

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread Tom Van Baak
https://www.febo.com/pages/gps_pps/ It appears the implementation of the sawtooth error correction severely degrades the performance of the system. There could be many reasons, which is why it is important to nail down as many of the error sources as possible. severely degrades??

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread Tom Van Baak
Tom and Bob, It is not obvious to me that it is easier to simply apply a correction in nS increments with a range as wide as 100nS. How is this done? Using switched delay lines or delay gates? Didier, If you intend to measure the 1PPS there is no need to correct or adjust it prior to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, Agree. If you steer so you keep to be off frequency so you have plenty of sawtooth you get better resolution. I've been pondering about maybe write an article to illustrate the effect. Cheers, Magnus On 04/03/14 23:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Be careful of what you wish for. One way to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi, You still get hanging bridges, but smaller in amplitude and for the same oscillator stability much more short-lived. Cheers, Magnus On 06/03/14 00:03, Bob Camp wrote: Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there’s no need to eliminate the hanging

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread Bob Camp
of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there?s no need to eliminate the hanging bridges

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
. /tvb - Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-06 Thread David J Taylor
To the Mike that posted: http://www.pst.netii.net/patents.htm - I tried going to your site - can't reach it. Is the site operational? I wanted to take a look at your patents. Thanks, John Westmoreland == Jon, It's working OK from Edinburgh at 07:08 UTC.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Mike M
Bob Camp wrote: Hi Be careful of what you wish for. One way to eliminate the hanging bridge is to have the oscillator exactly on frequency. That sounds fine. The problem is that you are always in the middle of a bridge. Bob That's fine. Just set the oscillator to keep the

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there’s no need to eliminate the hanging bridges. The sawtooth data does that for you already. Put another way, heating the receiver is *harder* than just using the decoded data…. Bob On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:53 AM,

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Van Baak
and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there’s no need to eliminate the hanging bridges. The sawtooth data does

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Bob Camp
- Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Didier Juges
-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there's no need to eliminate the hanging bridges. The sawtooth data does that for you already. Put another way, heating the receiver is *harder* than just using the decoded data

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel Mendes
Em 05/03/2014 22:43, Didier Juges escreveu: Tom and Bob, It is not obvious to me that it is easier to simply apply a correction in nS increments with a range as wide as 100nS. How is this done? Using switched delay lines or delay gates? Using a DS1023 or a DS1124 plus a microcontroller to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Bob Camp
- Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The sawtooth correction on a good GPS will go down to a few hundred ps over a thirty or so ns range. If you are going to correct, you need a chip that is accurate to 100 ps over a 30 ns ( 300 tap) range. That’s a tough part to find. Next you need to worry about jitter in the delay line ….

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Didier Juges shali...@gmail.com wrote: Tom and Bob, It is not obvious to me that it is easier to simply apply a correction in nS increments with a range as wide as 100nS. How is this done? Using switched delay lines or delay gates? Here is my plan for

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Chris Albertson
Th On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: Hi The disconnect is that there is no need at all to correct for the delay with some sort of delay line setup. The sawtooth correction simply sums into the input of your control algorithm for the corrected oscillator. It's

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-05 Thread Mike
: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hi If you are going to decode and use the sawtooth data out of the receiver, there?s no need to eliminate the hanging bridges. The sawtooth data does that for you already. Put another way, heating the receiver is *harder* than just using

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Didier Juges
What would be more interesting would be to adjust the temperature of the GPS receiver's oscillator to eliminate the hanging bridges altogether, kind of like Trimble does with the Thunderbolt, except that they do it directly instead of indirectly. That may require to characterize the crystal

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Bob Stewart
, 2014 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question What would be more interesting would be to adjust the temperature of the GPS receiver's oscillator to eliminate the hanging bridges altogether, kind of like Trimble does with the Thunderbolt, except that they do it directly

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Tom Holmes
...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bob Stewart Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:08 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question I suggested yesterday to periodically heat and cool the oscillator, but my post may have been lost in the noise

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Bob Stewart
: Tom Holmes thol...@woh.rr.com To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 12:07 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Hanging bridge? What is it; where is it found; and how does it form? My guess

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Hal Murray
thol...@woh.rr.com said: Hanging bridge? What is it; where is it found; and how does it form? Tom Clark and Rick Hambly: Timing for VLBI http://gpstime.com/files/tow-time2009.pdf tvb: Motorola GPS M12+ Sawtooth http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12/sawtooth.htm -- These are my opinions.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Tom Holmes
Of Hal Murray Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:23 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question thol...@woh.rr.com said: Hanging bridge? What is it; where is it found; and how does it form? Tom Clark

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-04 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Be careful of what you wish for. One way to “eliminate” the hanging bridge is to have the oscillator exactly on frequency. That sounds fine. The problem is that you are always in the middle of a bridge. The other way is to put the oscillator well off frequency. That way you have lots of

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Hal Murray
Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by varying the power in the resister? Sure, for some values of perfect and such.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The simple approach is to use an op amp, a thermistor, and a couple of resistors. No need for anything digital. You can easily get all the gain possible (before oscillation) out of a very simple circuit. The net result will be about a 1C stability when you run it over temperature (say 0

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/3/14 2:18 AM, Hal Murray wrote: Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by varying the power in the resister?

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Richard H McCorkle
Hal, For science-fair level accuracy try a $2 PTC-60 thermistor heater one component oven for minimal complexity. I tried this with a small box and insulating foam and it gives surprisingly good results. Leave it to the ham radio guys to come up with a low cost solution.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you are measuring temperature in a room who’s temperature does not change, then yes you can hold 0.1 C. That of course is based on the “room does not change temperature” and that equates to absolutely no change at all. The only rational way to discus temperature stability is as a

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Albertson
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message ab202da8-82bd-4861-af15-abbf92779...@rtty.us, Bob Camp writes: If you are measuring temperature in a room who's temperature does not change, then yes you can hold 0.1 C. That would make you quite famous, since the current best measurement of Bolzmans constant has a relative

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Albertson
The OCXO maker is forced to use a temperature sensor because he does not have access to a frequency reference. If do have an external frequency reference then the crystal itself makes a good thermometer. So why not use THAT thermometer to control the heat added by the resister.Such a system

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The crystal as normally cut makes a very poor thermometer compared to a thermistor. Bob On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: The OCXO maker is forced to use a temperature sensor because he does not have access to a frequency reference. If do have

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Tom Van Baak
So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by varying the power in the resister? Sure. In fact you can loosely phase lock it to GPS that way. Your xtal doesn't need to have an EFC pin. You are using external temperature as

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Bob Stewart
of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question Sure. In fact you can loosely phase lock it to GPS that way. Your xtal doesn't need to have an EFC pin. You are using external temperature

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Albertson
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote: What you are proposing is a disciplined oscillator using the oven setpoint as the control input. What I want to try is building a GPSDO for say $25 for everything except the GPS. A fun contest would be to adopt

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-03 Thread Bob Camp
Hi So I can use the scrap (zero value) 5 MHz 3rd OT HC-40 package SC’s that are sitting in a pile in the basement right ? Bob On Mar 3, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote: What

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Chris Albertson
Yes, there is some satisfaction is measuring to fine tolerances. Of all the physical measurements we can take, frequency can be measured with the most accuracy.You say 1ppb is enough.Let's see a billion is 1E9. A 10Mhz signal is 1E7 cycles per second 9-7 is 2. You can get to 1ppm

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 02/03/2014 02:07:05 GMT Standard Time, bob91...@yahoo.com writes: All this is very interesting. However, my interest is frequency. In other words, I want to know that my standard oscillators are as close to desired frequency as possible, and how close that turns out to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Tom Van Baak
My opinion: For 1ppm you will need any reasonable GPS receiver that has a 1PPS output. You can find them that are really good and put the Chris, I agree investing in a cheap GPS receiver is a good step for anyone playing with time frequency. I would recommend the same. But I'd like to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi When you say “adjust crystals close” do you mean: 1) Grinding / plating crystal blanks? (as in fabricating crystals from scratch) 2) Setting uncompensated crystal oscillators on frequency? (as in some radios) 3) Calibrating the OCXO that is the master reference for an instrument? That all

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Assuming you are after a reference at 10 ppb accuracy: 10 ppb would be a 10 second beat note on WWV at 10 MHz. (I *hope* I got the decimal point right that time). Fire up your radio and start listening to the various frequencies. You want a time when it’s crystal clear with absolutely no

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Albert
I'm not ready to delve into temperature measurement.  But I thought conventional wisdom is that most crystals are AT cut and an attempt at zero average coefficient is made, causing a nonlinear characteristic.  But perhaps over a limited range it's linear.  The problem of course is calibration.

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Albert
Yes Nigel, it's a waste of time but so are computer games and going to Disneyland and such.  We do it because we get pleasure, and nobody can criticize that. I am a bit confused over your mention of Trimble units.  I'm not familiar with them or what they are supposed to do.  I better do some

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi On Mar 2, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Bob Albert bob91...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm not ready to delve into temperature measurement. But I thought conventional wisdom is that most crystals are AT cut and an attempt at zero average coefficient is made, causing a nonlinear characteristic. But perhaps

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Trimble is one of many companies in the GPSDO business. A GPSDO is an oscillator that is locked up to the GPS signal. In many cases the oscillator is a pretty good OCXO. Trimble made a lot of these for the cell tower people. They now show up pretty regularly on the surplus market. A GPSDO

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Pete Lancashire
BA I am a bit confused over your mention of Trimble units. I'm not familiar with them or what they are supposed to do. BA I better do some homework. The best thing said so far ... Scan the archives and Google for GPSDO, do some research and reading Then the archives for Trimble then for

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Hal Murray
li...@rtty.us said: A number of them have sold recently on eBay for about $130. Don't forget the antenna and power supply. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 02/03/2014 16:06:49 GMT Standard Time, bob91...@yahoo.com writes: Yes Nigel, it's a waste of time but so are computer games and going to Disneyland and such. We do it because we get pleasure, and nobody can criticize that. - Hi Bob, I'm not

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Hal Murray
bob91...@yahoo.com said: But I thought conventional wisdom is that most crystals are AT cut and an attempt at zero average coefficient is made, causing a nonlinear characteristic.  But perhaps over a limited range it's linear.  The problem of course is calibration. Most crystals are low

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Depending on which auction you find and what they include you may indeed have some other bits and pieces to dig up as well. The prices run in cycles, so you will always pay a bit more if you “want it right now” than if you are willing to sit back and shop for a few months. Bob On Mar 2,

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi These days, you can get some *very* low cost crystals. They sell by the pound rather than by the piece. The tolerance as delivered may be 0.1% for temperature plus calibration. Aging is likely to be “who knows”. The temperature characteristic could be a third order curve. More likely it’s a

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Tom Miller
- Original Message - From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net To: Bob Albert bob91...@yahoo.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 2:45 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Albert
To: Bob Albert bob91...@yahoo.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 2:45 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question bob91...@yahoo.com said: Okay you want numbers. Well, I think 10

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 2:45 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question bob91...@yahoo.com said: Okay you want numbers. Well, I think 10 ppb or thereabouts should do it. Somewhere there is a discontinuity in accuracy plotted against cost and I

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Chris Albertson
Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by varying the power in the resister? -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi As long as your resistor keeps the temperature to within a micro degree it will do pretty well. Bob On Mar 2, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/2/14 11:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: Junk crystals are good thermometers. Ballpark is 1 ppm/degree-C So does this mean I can epoxy a sandstone power resister to a junk crystal and keep the frequency exactly perfect by varying the power in the resister? Yes.. but you have to hold

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/2/14 12:21 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi As long as your resistor keeps the temperature to within a micro degree it will do pretty well. Oh, you were looking for 1E-12.. I was thinking 1E-9 would be good enough. The other issue is that the phase noise might be pretty bad with a cheap

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The gotcha is that there are second order temperature effects. If you are going to run the crystal very far off turn, you need to keep it more stable than you might think. Bob On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net wrote: On 3/2/14 12:21 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi As

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 02/03/14 21:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that there are second order temperature effects. If you are going to run the crystal very far off turn, you need to keep it more stable than you might think. hysteresis, memory effect, restart of frequency drift Yeah, it puts a limit on

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/2/14 1:00 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: On 02/03/14 21:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that there are second order temperature effects. If you are going to run the crystal very far off turn, you need to keep it more stable than you might think. hysteresis, memory effect, restart of

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
HI On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: On 02/03/14 21:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that there are second order temperature effects. If you are going to run the crystal very far off turn, you need to keep it more stable than you might

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi Bob, On 02/03/14 23:16, Bob Camp wrote: HI On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: On 02/03/14 21:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that there are second order temperature effects. If you are going to run the crystal very far off turn, you

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
On Mar 2, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: Hi Bob, On 02/03/14 23:16, Bob Camp wrote: HI On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: On 02/03/14 21:45, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha is that there are second

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Hal Murray
tmiller11...@verizon.net said: Is that 3 MHz OCXO one from Ridge? If so, I opened one up and was surprised to find it did not have any foam insulation. RDR Electronics There were 2 per board, from some old telco/cell gear. http://w9fz.com/ham/s3mhz2.jpg http://w9fz.com/ham/3mhzocxo.txt

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Jim Lux
As Jim mentions in another post, you can run on the fundamental and the third (or 5th or 7th) and get a thermometer out of the delta between the two modes. The gotcha is that a change in load impedance will shift the frequencies unequally. That will give you an apparent temperature change. I

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I believe the paper was by Stan Shadowski. I’m *certain* I’ve mis-spelled his last name, which is indeed a very poor move on my part. I would not be surprised if there are several co-authors. I don’t have the UFC indexes here at home so I have no quick way to look it up. Bob On Mar 2,

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-01 Thread Paul Alfille
There are WWVB clocks with serial output. Arcron made one that I added linux ntp support for some years back. http://www.atomictimeclock.com/radsynarcron.htm http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/drivers/driver27.html As I recall, it was under $100, quite nicely styled, and is sitting here

Re: [time-nuts] Another atomic clock question

2014-03-01 Thread Bob Albert
All this is very interesting.  However, my interest is frequency.  In other words, I want to know that my standard oscillators are as close to desired frequency as possible, and how close that turns out to be. Yes, the Internet gives me time of day as close as I care to know.  I have an

  1   2   >