/day, which equals to a 0.67e-13 freq error during days 9-11,
Then right after that at day 12, 5ns /hr for a freq error of ~1e-12.
ws
**
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:11:23 -0500
From: Arthur Dent
Subject: [time-nuts] Another use for a Trimble Thunderbolt
’d say
’d say that the plot is telling the truth. It also seems to be giving
you information fast enough that thermal drift and barometric pressure
is not to big an issue. If you had to wait a day or three for the same
data, drift would be a much bigger issue. Yes, when you get to the
“close enough”
On Dec 25, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Arthur Dent golgarfrinc...@gmail.com wrote:
’d say that the plot is telling the truth. It also seems to be giving
you information fast enough that thermal drift and barometric pressure
is not to big an issue. If you had to wait a day or three for the same
data,
Those of you who know I had hacked the RFTG-u REF 1 GPS years
ago and had one running for 4 years before other time nuts
discovered these units probably won't be too surprised that
I have tried another hack that may have limited interest but
works for me.
Having owned a large number of
Hi
On Dec 24, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Arthur Dent golgarfrinc...@gmail.com wrote:
Those of you who know I had hacked the RFTG-u REF 1 GPS years
ago and had one running for 4 years before other time nuts
discovered these units probably won't be too surprised that
I have tried another hack that
