Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Just to be very clear:

a spec guarantee of  1.0 x 10^-13 at any tau between 1 second and 100 seconds 
is a very different thing than generally below 1.0x10^-12 at 1 second.

That said, not all BVA's meet that spec. 

Bob


On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Said Jackson saidj...@aol.com wrote:

 Steve,
 
 10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better 
 than that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at 
 least 1s to 30s and more.
 
 Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL, 
 Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no big 
 deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as much 
 as four CSACs or more.
 
 Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically for 
 ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or are 
 known to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know of 
 many.. Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as far as 
 I have seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large number 
 of 10811's he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly great.
 
 Thanks,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
 advantages over BVA.
 
 Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 x
 10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
 available on a new product.
 
 Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
 second.
 
 It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
 this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Steve 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Mike Feher
Said -

I bet you he meant exactly what you said, just had a mistake in the
representation of the exponent. Hope all is well with you. Was just at GD
all week. Regards - Mike 

Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960 office
908-902-3831 cell

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Said Jackson
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:53 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

Steve,

10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better
than that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at
least 1s to 30s and more.

Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL,
Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no big
deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as much
as four CSACs or more.

Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically for
ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or are
known to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know of
many.. Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as far as
I have seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large number
of 10811's he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly great.

Thanks,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer 
 many advantages over BVA.
 
 Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing 
 of 5 x
 10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is 
 available on a new product.
 
 Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for 
 one second.
 
 It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing 
 and this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Steve
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The BVA's were specifically targeted at very good ADEV performance. It's sort 
of a left brain / right brain sort of thing. The time people look at ADEV and 
close in is usually 1 second and sometimes 0.1 second. The frequency people 
look at phase noise and really low is often 10 Hz, and occasionally 1 Hz. The 
two measurements do sort of correspond to each other, but not entirely. One 
second ADEV at X does not directly map to 1 Hz phase noise at a level of Y. 

The frequency guys want to womp the signal up to something high, and their math 
is easy if they start with phase noise. The timing people use different math, 
and phase noise doesn't really do it for them. ADEV sort of works for timing 
applications. There are other more specific measures for certain timing needs. 

Bob

On Aug 30, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:

 I may be mistaken but I thought the very close in Ultra Low Phase Noise was 
 what the BVA name was built on, even more then Aging. But with the 
 performance advances of Wenzel and others over the past few decades it is 
 difficult to justify the price.
 
 Thomas Knox
 
 Ascent Concepts and Technology
 
 4475 Whitney Place
 Boulder Colorado 80305
 
 1-303-554-0307
 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:13:54 -0400
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs
 
 Hi
 
 Just to be very clear:
 
 a spec guarantee of  1.0 x 10^-13 at any tau between 1 second and 100 
 seconds is a very different thing than generally below 1.0x10^-12 at 1 
 second.
 
 That said, not all BVA's meet that spec. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Said Jackson saidj...@aol.com wrote:
 
 Steve,
 
 10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better 
 than that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at 
 least 1s to 30s and more.
 
 Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL, 
 Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no 
 big deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as 
 much as four CSACs or more.
 
 Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically 
 for ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or 
 are known to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know 
 of many.. Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as 
 far as I have seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large 
 number of 10811's he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly 
 great.
 
 Thanks,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
 advantages over BVA.
 
 Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 
 x
 10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
 available on a new product.
 
 Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
 second.
 
 It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
 this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Steve 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Said Jackson
Steve,

10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better than 
that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at least 1s to 
30s and more.

Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL, 
Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no big 
deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as much as 
four CSACs or more.

Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically for 
ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or are known 
to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know of many.. 
Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as far as I have 
seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large number of 10811's 
he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly great.

Thanks,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
 advantages over BVA.
 
 Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 x
 10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
 available on a new product.
 
 Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
 second.
 
 It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
 this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Steve 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Tom Knox
I may be mistaken but I thought the very close in Ultra Low Phase Noise was 
what the BVA name was built on, even more then Aging. But with the performance 
advances of Wenzel and others over the past few decades it is difficult to 
justify the price.

Thomas Knox

Ascent Concepts and Technology

4475 Whitney Place
Boulder Colorado 80305

1-303-554-0307

 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:13:54 -0400
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs
 
 Hi
 
 Just to be very clear:
 
 a spec guarantee of  1.0 x 10^-13 at any tau between 1 second and 100 
 seconds is a very different thing than generally below 1.0x10^-12 at 1 
 second.
 
 That said, not all BVA's meet that spec. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Said Jackson saidj...@aol.com wrote:
 
  Steve,
  
  10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better 
  than that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at 
  least 1s to 30s and more.
  
  Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL, 
  Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no 
  big deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as 
  much as four CSACs or more.
  
  Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically 
  for ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or 
  are known to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know 
  of many.. Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as 
  far as I have seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large 
  number of 10811's he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly 
  great.
  
  Thanks,
  Said
  
  Sent From iPhone
  
  On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:
  
  Hello,
  
  Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
  advantages over BVA.
  
  Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 
  x
  10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
  available on a new product.
  
  Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
  second.
  
  It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
  this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
  
  Best Regards
  
  Steve 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Martyn Smith

Hello,

Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
advantages over BVA.

Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 x
10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
available on a new product.

Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
second.

It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.

Best Regards

Steve 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs

2013-08-30 Thread Said Jackson
Thomas,

As Bob mentions phase noise and ADEV are not the same thing. We have a very 
good PN Wenzel here, and it has horrible ADEV. The BVA has much worse phase 
noise but 100x or so better ADEV than the Wenzel at 100s. These are apples and 
oranges.

ADEV in the low xE-013 for 1s to 30+s is extremely hard to find and if you 
happen to need it quit expensive too.

On top of that you will have to shell out about $15,000 or so to get equipment 
that can consistently measure at that level nowadays.

Bye,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Aug 30, 2013, at 9:31, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:

 I may be mistaken but I thought the very close in Ultra Low Phase Noise was 
 what the BVA name was built on, even more then Aging. But with the 
 performance advances of Wenzel and others over the past few decades it is 
 difficult to justify the price.
 
 Thomas Knox
 
 Ascent Concepts and Technology
 
 4475 Whitney Place
 Boulder Colorado 80305
 
 1-303-554-0307
 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:13:54 -0400
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BVA Oscillaotrs
 
 Hi
 
 Just to be very clear:
 
 a spec guarantee of  1.0 x 10^-13 at any tau between 1 second and 100 
 seconds is a very different thing than generally below 1.0x10^-12 at 1 
 second.
 
 That said, not all BVA's meet that spec. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Said Jackson saidj...@aol.com wrote:
 
 Steve,
 
 10E-013 means 1E-012. But the BVAs run in the low xE-013, about 10x better 
 than that. And they are specifically designed to give great ADEV from at 
 least 1s to 30s and more.
 
 Agreed, its very easy to find fantastic phase noise performance from NEL, 
 Pascal, Wenzel and others. That (-180dBc noise floor etc) seems to be no 
 big deal these days, even though a very good Pascal ocxo will still cost as 
 much as four CSACs or more.
 
 Please give some examples of oscillators that were designed specifically 
 for ADEV performance and can be ordered with specific ADEV parameters or 
 are known to have these kinds of performance levels typically, I don't know 
 of many.. Maybe 1 out of 10 HP 10811 will have ADEV in the low xE-013 as 
 far as I have seen. Tom Van Back has a nice treatise on the ADEV of a large 
 number of 10811's he measured in his Z38xx gpsdos, only some are truly 
 great.
 
 Thanks,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:21, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 Today many manufacturers are producing 10 MHz oscillators that offer many
 advantages over BVA.
 
 Phase noise of   -116 dBc @ 1 Hz with a -175 dBc noise floor, ageing of 5 
 x
 10E-9 per month and a G sensitivity of 5 x 10E-11 /g in all axis is
 available on a new product.
 
 Also the short term Allan variance is in the low parts in 10E-13 for one
 second.
 
 It seems to me the only real advantage of BVA is the long term ageing and
 this can easily be sorted out by locking to a superior standard.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Steve 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.