ways so?? Remember the politicians pay the bills not the
> engineers!
> Alan
> G3NYK
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric Williams"
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:04 PM
&
bills not the
> engineers!
> Alan
> G3NYK
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric Williams"
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FCC politics vs t
Was it not always so?? Remember the politicians pay the bills not the
engineers!
Alan
G3NYK
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Williams"
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] F
"He tells me with some bitterness that politics triumphed over
all of the objections of the engineering staff to LS and that this
is not the first time that this has happened."
That's how we ended up with Challenger and Columbia.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Michael Baker wrote:
> Time-Nut
Time-Nutters--
Jim wrote:
snip
> That's why the FCC granted a "conditional" waiver
> of the rules. It was politically expedient, and I would
> imagine that the engineers at the FCC thought "there's
> no way they'll be able to demonstrate no interference"
Charles wrote:
snip
> The Commission not
