Re: [time-nuts] GPS time module

2013-10-29 Thread lstoskopf
 Sorry if already posted:

http://www.saelig.com/COMCR/COMCR002.htm
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS time module

2013-10-29 Thread SAIDJACK
Sorry in advance guys,
 
I could not resist doing a short comparison between our LC_XO module and  
this new Selig/RF-Suisse 1x1 module. Please excuse this blatantly biased  
comparison:
 
The Selig module is slightly larger, and consumes about the same amount of  
power as the LC_XO (TCXO version), and basically provides a similar set of  
signals. It is however about twice as expensive, has an 8-week lead-time 
versus  from-stock delivery, and there are other differences:
 
* 20 channel GPS without WAAS/SBAS (Selig) versus 50 channels with  
WAAS/SBAS (LC_XO)
 
* 1us time pulse accuracy (Selig) versus +/-25ns time pulse accuracy typ.  
(LC_XO)
 
* Washing not approved (Selig) versus washing approved (LC_XO)
 
* Selig requires an antenna cable to be plugged into the bottom of the PCB, 
 then the module is soldered onto a customer PCB. Thus if the antenna cable 
 becomes loose, it cannot be plugged back into the connector. LC_XO: 
antenna feed  via the solder pins from carrier PCB
 
* Selig I/O: Status LED and requirement to program for an I2C slave  
register, no NMEA or control command interface for GPSCon, GPSD, or Z38xx  etc 
versus LC_XO: two NMEA outputs (RAW NMEA and Binary from uBlox GPS), JLT  NMEA 
commands with custom commands, and SCPI control interface for third-party  
software
 
* Selig 60,000 feet altitude limit versus 164,000 feet for LC_XO
 
* Power requirement: Selig: 5V versus LC_XO 3.3V (LC_XO will provide 5V  
from internal DC switcher that can be used externally on carrier PCB)
 
* Phase Noise: about the same between both units
 
* ADEV: Selig slightly better at around 20s, LC_XO better above 1000s  
(LC_XO short-term ADEV can be significantly improved in stable environments by  
setting the time-constant of the loop to longer time frames)
 
* Selig module options: GPS or no GPS versus LC_XO module options: TCXO,  
OCXO, and external 1PPS input with auto-switchover to internal GPS  receiver
 
* Firmware updates: Selig does not provide customer update mechanism versus 
 LC_XO can be easily updated with various firmware versions available for  
customer download from the website without any website log-in etc.
 
* Selig TCXO stability: +/-100ppb from -20C to +70C versus +/-75ppb from 0C 
 to 60C or +/-25ppb from 0C to +60C (OCXO version)
 
Selig/RF-Suisse offering this form factor is a welcome event as it  
validates the form factor in itself.
 
I am however not seeing too many advantages for the Selig part in  
comparison especially at about twice the cost, am I missing something?
 
bye,
Said
 
 
In a message dated 10/29/2013 14:54:51 Pacific Daylight Time,  
lstosk...@cox.net writes:

Sorry if  already  posted:

http://www.saelig.com/COMCR/COMCR002.htm

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS time module

2013-10-29 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
Thanks for the comparison Said.  I am glad I have an LC_XO.  ;)

Regards,
John Westmoreland



On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:35 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:

 Sorry in advance guys,

 I could not resist doing a short comparison between our LC_XO module and
 this new Selig/RF-Suisse 1x1 module. Please excuse this blatantly biased
 comparison:

 The Selig module is slightly larger, and consumes about the same amount of
 power as the LC_XO (TCXO version), and basically provides a similar set of
 signals. It is however about twice as expensive, has an 8-week lead-time
 versus  from-stock delivery, and there are other differences:

 * 20 channel GPS without WAAS/SBAS (Selig) versus 50 channels with
 WAAS/SBAS (LC_XO)

 * 1us time pulse accuracy (Selig) versus +/-25ns time pulse accuracy typ.
 (LC_XO)

 * Washing not approved (Selig) versus washing approved (LC_XO)

 * Selig requires an antenna cable to be plugged into the bottom of the PCB,
  then the module is soldered onto a customer PCB. Thus if the antenna cable
  becomes loose, it cannot be plugged back into the connector. LC_XO:
 antenna feed  via the solder pins from carrier PCB

 * Selig I/O: Status LED and requirement to program for an I2C slave
 register, no NMEA or control command interface for GPSCon, GPSD, or Z38xx
  etc
 versus LC_XO: two NMEA outputs (RAW NMEA and Binary from uBlox GPS), JLT
  NMEA
 commands with custom commands, and SCPI control interface for third-party
 software

 * Selig 60,000 feet altitude limit versus 164,000 feet for LC_XO

 * Power requirement: Selig: 5V versus LC_XO 3.3V (LC_XO will provide 5V
 from internal DC switcher that can be used externally on carrier PCB)

 * Phase Noise: about the same between both units

 * ADEV: Selig slightly better at around 20s, LC_XO better above 1000s
 (LC_XO short-term ADEV can be significantly improved in stable
 environments by
 setting the time-constant of the loop to longer time frames)

 * Selig module options: GPS or no GPS versus LC_XO module options: TCXO,
 OCXO, and external 1PPS input with auto-switchover to internal GPS
  receiver

 * Firmware updates: Selig does not provide customer update mechanism versus
  LC_XO can be easily updated with various firmware versions available for
 customer download from the website without any website log-in etc.

 * Selig TCXO stability: +/-100ppb from -20C to +70C versus +/-75ppb from 0C
  to 60C or +/-25ppb from 0C to +60C (OCXO version)

 Selig/RF-Suisse offering this form factor is a welcome event as it
 validates the form factor in itself.

 I am however not seeing too many advantages for the Selig part in
 comparison especially at about twice the cost, am I missing something?

 bye,
 Said


 In a message dated 10/29/2013 14:54:51 Pacific Daylight Time,
 lstosk...@cox.net writes:

 Sorry if  already  posted:

 http://www.saelig.com/COMCR/COMCR002.htm

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.