and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] General questions on 8510C network analyzers
Hi,
El 04/07/2011 23:29, Jim Lux escribió:
you definitely want phase. Otherwise a regular old sweeper and a
spectrum analyzer would do. But phase implies a synchronous receiver,
which greatly
Hi, Tom,
Thanks for your comments. Generally speaking, my VNA needs are quite
ocassional, so even a new ENA would be difficult to amortize :) although
I see it is a nice machine - but surely in the price range of a good car
(I've a price reference of around 28000 EUR for the 1.5 or 3GHz
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that best
suits my present and near future needs would be an 8510C system (well,
surely a new PNA-X would fulfill it better - except budgetary :) ).
At 20:47 04/07/2011, you wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that
best suits my present and near future needs would be an 8510C system
(well, surely a new PNA-X would fulfill it
Try the TestEquipTrader Group or the HP_Aglent_Equipment Group on Yahoo.
-John
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that best
suits my present and near future needs
On 7/4/11 11:47 AM, Javier Herrero wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that best
suits my present and near future needs would be an 8510C system (well,
surely a new PNA-X would
Hello, Jim,
El 04/07/2011 22:00, Jim Lux escribió:
WHat frequency range do you need?
We have an intermittently dead 8510 at work, but in the course of
trying to get it to work again, I've learned a fair amount about it..
For now, 2.2 and 8.2GHz, but would like something that covers future
On 7/4/11 1:40 PM, Javier Herrero wrote:
Hello, Jim,
Again for now, no extensive frequency precision, so would be suitable. I
suppose that this is valid with the 8350B sources, but does it operates
in the same way with an 8340 synthesized sweeper, or in that case it
commands the frequency
Hi,
El 04/07/2011 23:29, Jim Lux escribió:
you definitely want phase. Otherwise a regular old sweeper and a
spectrum analyzer would do. But phase implies a synchronous receiver,
which greatly improves the dynamic range, and that's often what you
want..
Right! For my current application,
Hi:
I remember from working on the 8410/8409 that sweepers are bad news for
VNAs. The problem is both repeatability of frequency (you need to come
back to the same frequency many times then combine all that data for
calibration and for measurement) and phase noise. You really need a
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] General questions on 8510C network analyzers
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that best
suits my present
Subject: [time-nuts] General questions on 8510C network analyzers
Hello all!
I'm in the need of a network analyzer, and after some considerations
about the different available options, I think that the unit that best
suits my present and near future needs would be an 8510C system (well,
surely
12 matches
Mail list logo