subject:"\[time\-nuts\] HP 5061A\/B Cesium tube conundrum"

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5061A/B Cesium tube conundrum

2017-01-22 Thread paul swed

Corby Curious if you ever received any other comments or had success? Regards Paul WB8TSL On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:07 PM, paul swed wrote: > Corby thats a heck of a puzzle. I am trying to think about how you could > prove it. I have some thoughts that are not at all well

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5061A/B Cesium tube conundrum

2017-01-16 Thread paul swed

Corby thats a heck of a puzzle. I am trying to think about how you could prove it. I have some thoughts that are not at all well formed. It comes from my experiments on Frankenstein temp control. If you could please tell me what you might expect the alternate bridge resistors to be overall I will

[time-nuts] HP 5061A/B Cesium tube conundrum

2017-01-16 Thread cdelect

I've been doing some work on testing some HP 5061A/B tubes and came across something that's not making any sense! The R11 and R12 values marked on the tubes for use with the new style A11 are supposed to reflect a parallel value that is 10X larger than the thermistor reading. This to agree with