[time-nuts] Motorola M12+ breakout board

2018-02-16 Thread Mark Sims
Besides the Furuno GT-8036 breakout board,  I just did a layout for a board 
that converts the pinouts of Motorola M12+ compatible receivers to a 0.1" 9-pin 
header that (mostly) matches the Adafruit Ultimate GPS.   The Adafruit ENABLE 
pin is repurposed as a DGPS RTCM corrections input and the Adafurit +3.3VREG 
output pin is used to provide  external antenna (5V) power... the board 
defaults to use the 3.3V VCC power input for the antenna power.  Contact me off 
list if interested.___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] Motorola M12+

2013-11-22 Thread Pascual Arbona Lopez
I am wondering if this is a sustitute of  the original oncore VP receiver for 
the Z3801 -Z3805. (E-pay 281161070304 )
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+

2013-11-22 Thread Azelio Boriani
Strange item... it has an M12+ and a supporting board full of
components. Protocol translation from 12-channel to 8-channel? The
link to the PDF file returns a 404.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Pascual Arbona Lopez
p.arb...@securimar.com wrote:
 I am wondering if this is a sustitute of  the original oncore VP receiver for 
 the Z3801 -Z3805. (E-pay 281161070304 )
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+

2013-11-22 Thread Mark C. Stephens
That's not the original gps rx.. (281161070304)

Careful what you get off yixun..

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Pascual Arbona Lopez
Sent: Friday, 22 November 2013 7:33 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+

I am wondering if this is a sustitute of  the original oncore VP receiver for 
the Z3801 -Z3805. (E-pay 281161070304 ) 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Motorola M12+ or M12M questions

2009-07-07 Thread Martyn Smith

Hello,

I have been asked a question from a friend and would like to hear what the
time-nuts have to say about the M12+ and M12M GPS receivers.

His questions were:

1) It would be great if you could outline the broad algorithm and bits of
information that go into keeping the 1 pps aligned to UTC.  I want to be
able to can ensure that we're at least aware of all the subtle effects (such
as illustrated in the next question).

2) along with the gps time signal, information is broadcast to relate gps
time to utc. whenever there's a step change in these corrections (such as on
midnight 31/12/2008), how does the unit react?
2.1) in particular, how quickly does the time code reflect the change,
and is the 1pps affected in any way?

Time-Nuts.  Any help on these two questions would be appreciated

Steve Jones


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+ or M12M questions

2009-07-07 Thread Hal Murray

 2) along with the gps time signal, information is broadcast to relate
 gps time to utc. whenever there's a step change in these corrections
 (such as on midnight 31/12/2008), how does the unit react? 2.1) in
 particular, how quickly does the time code reflect the change, and is
 the 1pps affected in any way? 

Check the data sheet on the unit.  It probably has a section describing the 
leap second stuff.

They happen infrequently enough that you can usually get the info by other 
means.  I'm sure the next one will be announced here.

GPS works on GPS time.  The satellites tell you the offset to UTC.  I expect 
that offset kicks over at the magic time, but I wouldn't be surprised by 
bugs.  Somebody may have data from watching the last time we had one.  (I was 
watching a NMEA unit.  It inserted the leap second at midnight GPS time 
rather than midnight UTC.)

The PPS is tied to GPS time.  I don't expect any quirks from leap seconds.



-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+ or M12M questions

2009-07-07 Thread Magnus Danielson

Hal Murray wrote:

2) along with the gps time signal, information is broadcast to relate
gps time to utc. whenever there's a step change in these corrections
(such as on midnight 31/12/2008), how does the unit react? 2.1) in
particular, how quickly does the time code reflect the change, and is
the 1pps affected in any way? 


Check the data sheet on the unit.  It probably has a section describing the 
leap second stuff.


It is rarely beyond slogan level, if even mentioned in the datasheets.
The manual rarely says much useful on the subject either. It happends 
from time to time that receivers freezes on leap seconds only for the 
stupid reasons it was not tested by the vendor. A simple single sat GPS 
emulator would have helped to trigger the bug, which is sufficient for 
timing receivers and should work for position receivers too.


They happen infrequently enough that you can usually get the info by other 
means.  I'm sure the next one will be announced here.


There won't be one next new years even, it just became official 
yesterday. That was expected.


GPS works on GPS time.  The satellites tell you the offset to UTC.  I expect 
that offset kicks over at the magic time, but I wouldn't be surprised by 
bugs.  Somebody may have data from watching the last time we had one.  (I was 
watching a NMEA unit.  It inserted the leap second at midnight GPS time 
rather than midnight UTC.)


OUPS!


The PPS is tied to GPS time.  I don't expect any quirks from leap seconds.


If only listening to PPS and don't care about the time associated with 
it, you are safe. GPS time or UTC time should work equally well.


I think you should fetch the GPS ICD 200 document and read up on the 
details in the signal structure on how UTC is represented in 
relationship to the GPS signal. Then imagine all the bugs there can be.


There are (at least) three interpretations of when leap-seconds may be 
inserted:


1) At the end of every month.

2) At the end of every quarter.

3) At the end of every half-year.

GPS is operated under the assumption that case 3 holds.
There exist equipment assuming that case 2 holds.
The actual definition allows for case 1, making case 3 the primary 
preference and case 2 the secondary preference.


Lovely mess, isn't it?

Anyway, if I don't recall it incorrectly (OK lazy to check), the GPS 
signal actually indicate WHEN then upcomming leap second will occur.
This reduces to a up-comming leap second flag out of the GPS OEM board 
which can trigger pre-maturely execution of leap-second algorithm on the 
timing receiver, as we have seen in the Z3801A for instance.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+ or M12M questions

2009-07-07 Thread Graham / KE9H

Martyn Smith wrote:

Hello,

I have been asked a question from a friend and would like to hear what 
the

time-nuts have to say about the M12+ and M12M GPS receivers.

His questions were:

1) It would be great if you could outline the broad algorithm and bits of
information that go into keeping the 1 pps aligned to UTC.  I want to be
able to can ensure that we're at least aware of all the subtle effects 
(such

as illustrated in the next question).

2) along with the gps time signal, information is broadcast to relate gps
time to utc. whenever there's a step change in these corrections (such 
as on

midnight 31/12/2008), how does the unit react?
2.1) in particular, how quickly does the time code reflect the change,
and is the 1pps affected in any way?

Time-Nuts.  Any help on these two questions would be appreciated

Steve Jones




Your friend should download the manual from the Synergy-GPS website.

http://www.synergy-gps.com/

Page 114 of the M12+ Timing receiver manual says:

LEAP SECOND STATUS MESSAGE (@@Bj)

Applicability: M12+ Timing and Positioning Receivers

This message polls the receiver for current leap second status 
information that has
been decoded from the Navigation Data message received from the GPS 
satellites.
The data sent back by the receiver provides specific date and time 
information

pertaining to any future leap second addition or subtraction.

Leap seconds are occasionally inserted in UTC and generally occur on 
midnight
UTC June 30th or midnight UTC December 31st. The GPS control segment 
typically
notifies GPS users of pending leap second insertions to UTC several 
weeks before

the event.

When a leap second is inserted, the time of day will show a value of 
'60' in the
seconds field. When a leap second is removed, the date will roll over at 
58 seconds.
The 'current UTC offset' will be zero if the receiver is set up to run 
in GPS time mode

instead of UTC.

Default mode: Polled

Legacy Compatibility: The @@Bj message was used in an identical manner 
in virtually

all Motorola receivers.

--- Graham

==




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+ or M12M questions

2009-07-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 4a533c36.1030...@rubidium.dyndns.org
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org writes:
: There are (at least) three interpretations of when leap-seconds may be 
: inserted:
: 1) At the end of every month.

This is the ITU standard.  It says that leap seconds can be inserted
at the end of each month.  Almost no gear allows this, and the gear
that does doesn't always do it in a sane way.

: 2) At the end of every quarter.

This is also ITU standard.  These are the secondary times.  They have
never been used.

: 3) At the end of every half-year.

These are the primary times.

: GPS is operated under the assumption that case 3 holds.

Why is this the case?  The GPS data just tells you which week the next
leap second will happen, as well as the last time a leap second
happened.  How is it the case that you can say that 3 holds?

: There exist equipment assuming that case 2 holds.
: The actual definition allows for case 1, making case 3 the primary 
: preference and case 2 the secondary preference.

Yes.

: Lovely mess, isn't it?

Leap seconds are evil and must die.  For such a simple thing, there's
so much complication that getting leap seconds right can be rather
hard.

At least there's no leap second this December...

: Anyway, if I don't recall it incorrectly (OK lazy to check), the GPS 
: signal actually indicate WHEN then upcomming leap second will occur.
: This reduces to a up-comming leap second flag out of the GPS OEM board 
: which can trigger pre-maturely execution of leap-second algorithm on the 
: timing receiver, as we have seen in the Z3801A for instance.

You are correct.  There's an indication when the next leap second will
happen.  The Z3801A uses this to turn on a simple 'leap second
pending' which causes a leap second to happen at the next leap second
opportunity rather than at the week published.  The GPS operators turn
on next leap second about 4 or 5 months early, which triggers the bug.

Warner

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+T - On board oscillator phase noise specand/or part number

2009-01-01 Thread Tom Van Baak
 Hi All,
 
 Has anyone been able to figure out the part number and/or measured the
 phase noise of the quartz oscillator on board the Motorola M12+T?
 
 This will be an interesting figure to see.
 
 Regards,
 
 Stephan.

This is an ADEV+MDEV plot for the 100 Hz output of an
M12+ in free-run mode (no gps lock).

http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/m12-adev/m12-free.gif

If you want more data let me know.

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola M12+T - On board oscillator phase noise spec and/or part number

2009-01-01 Thread Matt Osborn
The crystal on my M12+T is marked
top to bottom:

32.768
KDS0530

I would imagine it is a custom device
from KDS http://www.kds.info/index_en.htm


On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:06:30 +0200, Stephan Sandenbergh
step...@rrsg.ee.uct.ac.za wrote:

Hi All,

Has anyone been able to figure out the part number and/or measured the
phase noise of the quartz oscillator on board the Motorola M12+T?

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Motorola M12+T - On board oscillator phase noise spec and/or part number

2008-12-23 Thread Stephan Sandenbergh
Hi All,

Has anyone been able to figure out the part number and/or measured the
phase noise of the quartz oscillator on board the Motorola M12+T?

This will be an interesting figure to see.

Regards,

Stephan.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.