[time-nuts] Navsync CW12 - More Info

2012-01-05 Thread Ed Palmer
Okay, I've cooled off - a bit. The bottom line is that the 10 MHz output of the CW12 isn't appropriate for what I wanted to do. Ah, the joys of reading and understanding a spec sheet! But let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Although the 10 MHz output has it's issues for

Re: [time-nuts] Navsync CW12 - More Info

2012-01-05 Thread Azelio Boriani
Great, don't forget to specify what reference your measurements were made from (or did I miss anything from your posts?). We use the CW12 PPS for our GPSDOs. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote: Okay, I've cooled off - a bit. The bottom line is that the 10 MHz

Re: [time-nuts] Navsync CW12 - More Info

2012-01-05 Thread Ed Palmer
Do you mean the reference oscillator for the 5372A? That was the internal 10811 OCXO. Over a 1000 sec. run, drift wouldn't have any affect on these numbers. Ed On 1/5/2012 12:54 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote: Great, don't forget to specify what reference your measurements were made from (or did

Re: [time-nuts] Navsync CW12 - More Info

2012-01-05 Thread Azelio Boriani
OK, thank you. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote: Do you mean the reference oscillator for the 5372A? That was the internal 10811 OCXO. Over a 1000 sec. run, drift wouldn't have any affect on these numbers. Ed On 1/5/2012 12:54 PM, Azelio Boriani