Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-12-02 Thread Joel Jameson
Just to give back to the group, here are the connectors I chose from Digikey to make the GPS MMCX antenna included with the kit detachable for an enclosure: 1x ACX1499-ND CONN ADAPT JACK-JACK MMCX 50 OHM 1x 744-1715-ND RF CABL MMCX ML STR / ML RA 6 Cheers, Joel W0KGW On Tue, Nov

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Hal wrote: So driving 50 Ohms inputs is not optimal here, 1M inputs are much better for this purpose. That only works if you have a (very) short connection to the next stage. Things get interesting if you have, say, 10 feet of unterminated coax. Thinking that the output was a sine wave, I

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread Dave Martindale
The 20 MHz output should be OK, since it is series-terminated with 50 ohms at the source and the buffer can source enough current. The driver sees a 100 ohm load (50 ohm resistor in series with 50 ohm coax impedance) for that 32 ns round trip time, so it will increase power dissipation (as you

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Charles, The increased current for the driver will cause heating near the crystal in both the CMOS driver and the 3.0V LDO as the LDO has to convert the excess voltage into heat. This may or may not affect the crystal. One could certainly try, this is why I initially said its certainly

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Dave, Exactly. Sent From iPhone On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:34, Dave Martindale dave.martind...@gmail.com wrote: The 20 MHz output should be OK, since it is series-terminated with 50 ohms at the source and the buffer can source enough current. The driver sees a 100 ohm load (50 ohm resistor in

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Said wrote: The increased current for the driver will cause heating near the crystal in both the CMOS driver and the 3.0V LDO as the LDO has to convert the excess voltage into heat. This may or may not affect the crystal. There would be next to no additional heating in the CMOS driver,

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-25 Thread S. Jackson via time-nuts
That's why I said its up to the user to decide what they want their trade-off to be. For permanent installations I personally would not run the unbuffered 10MHz output through more than about a foot of coax cable to the buffer. The rise/fall time of the TCXO output is slow enough (typical

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 24 November 2014 at 03:44, Said Jackson via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote: On the 20MHz units there is already a strong buffer that can drive 50 Ohms terminations so adding a buffer in front of the coax connector on that version would have just added unnecessary phase and AM noise,

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Correct, and thats why its all a bad trade off if you have to use 50 Ohms termination. Either more heat or more PN, and more circuitry. So driving 50 Ohms inputs is not optimal here, 1M inputs are much better for this purpose. I had discussed the advantages of CMOS open-ended termination some

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Mike Garvey
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement; Charles Steinmetz Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite In message 20141123153744.biokf...@smtp16.mail.yandex.net, Charles Steinmetz writes: First, mount the LTE in a cast aluminum box

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Jim Sanford
Said: Several times you've mentioned a low noise LDO regulator. I've not seen a device specified -- can you share? Also, yesterday, in response to my question about using an existing antenna, you basically said, Try it. Well, I did -- working great for over 24 hours. At this moment, I

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The Linear LT1764 is a pretty good part. It’s nice and rugged / tough to kill. Bypass the output with a few hundred uF of tantalum caps. Keep at least a volt between input and output. Bob On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote: Said: Several times you've

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Jim, Bobs suggestion is good; look at for example the LT3060 for something that needs less than 100mA. Glad your antenna is working well. What C/No numbers is uBlox indicating? Bye, Said Sent from my iPad On Nov 24, 2014, at 16:28, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote: Hi The Linear LT1764 is

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Jim Sanford
Said: I'm seeing C/No numbers between 50.0 and 41.0 for the green birds. I'm seeing 27.0 to 42 on the blue birds. Not quite sure what the difference between green and blue is. UBlox is acting kind of funny -- it ignores any attempt to click on an icon or any of the menu bar items. Yet it

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread paul swed
It won't respond the LTE LITE is send only. I found another program from the Chip manufacturer and it behaves teh same as expected and mentioned by Said. So putty works as well as anything. OK my first external fun with the LTE. Since I had no 74AS74 I used a 74HC74 chip running at 4.5V. This

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Jim, 41 to 50dB is great. The height difference may be MSL to GPS height? Bye, Said Sent From iPhone On Nov 24, 2014, at 18:39, Jim Sanford wb4...@wb4gcs.org wrote: Said: I'm seeing C/No numbers between 50.0 and 41.0 for the green birds. I'm seeing 27.0 to 42 on the blue birds. Not

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Hal Murray
Said Jackson said: Correct, and thats why its all a bad trade off if you have to use 50 Ohms termination. Either more heat or more PN, and more circuitry. So driving 50 Ohms inputs is not optimal here, 1M inputs are much better for this purpose. That only works if you have a (very) short

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Hal Murray
kb...@n1k.org said: Maybe Tom needs a Microsoft Windows Update on his GPSDO firmware :) For some reason the very thought of Microsoft getting involved in something like that makes me shudder… For good reason. A friend's scope picked up a virus. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

[time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-24 Thread Mark Sims
I once bought an HP16700 series logic analyzer off of Ebay that had a directory filled with porn on it... but that is a Unix machine. for good reason. A friend's scope picked up a virus. ___

[time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
I would like to make a unit with multiple 10 MHz 50 Ohm outputs to feed my various bits of test equipment. I am thinking about some practical considerations. 1) It would be great if there was a circuit published which can give 50 Ohn output impedance from a 12-15 power supply, which a) Doesn't

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20141123153744.biokf...@smtp16.mail.yandex.net, Charles Steinmetz writes: First, mount the LTE in a cast aluminum box (not thin sheet metal, something with some heft). [...] Charles' design has some good points, but I don't agree with it. What you are trying to do is to

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Dave wrote But given the TCXOs sensitivity to temperature changes, I don't know whether it might be preferable to mount the LTE lite in its own box without any power supplies in it - perhaps with some thermally insulting material around the LTE lite so the crystal doesn't experience any fast

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Magnus Danielson
NIST did something similar for their WWWV site, where they used bottled water in its staple packaging to build a thermal mass. They measured how their atomic clocks and rig behaved before and after, and could see the difference. Very neat way of using off the (store)shelf components for a

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Jim Sanford
All: I am enjoying this thread. These are all very interesting ideas. Hoping to power up my first unit later today I'm putting my LTE-Lite in the recommended HAMMOND box. That takes care of the box with air. I was then considering proportional heating of the surface of the box, like I

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Dave wrote: It would be great if there was a circuit published which can give 50 Ohn output impedance from a 12-15 power supply, which a) Doesn't load the TCXO b) Doesn't degrade the phase noise. WRT loading the TCXO, someone should establish quantitatively how high the load impedance must

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you have a basement in your house / building —and — it’s dry and reasonably draft free (no garage doors opening up from time to time) — and — At least one side / corner is well buried in the ground — and — You can get at that corner / side. Move your thermal baffle gizmo up

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message c9e99c83-aaa9-4d50-9729-b86a79af2...@n1k.org, Bob Camp writes: At least one side / corner is well buried in the ground But be aware that such a corner may be dry only when empty. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20141123174632.kvk4s...@smtp18.mail.yandex.net, Charles Steinmetz writes: And good luck fitting a cubic foot box with a surround of bricks into a 3U rack cabinet, or any other relocatable (much less,semi-portable) enclosure. I didn't say it doesn't work, I said that I don't

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi What you have in the LTE is a TCXO rather than a bare crystal or an OCXO. It’s got a compensation circuit that corrects the FT curve of the crystal. The net result is likely a 5th or higher order curve when you plot frequency over temperature. Every TCXO off that production line will have a

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread paul swed
I am scratching my head here. From what I see the LTE is a good unit but does swim around a bit. The conclusion I might get from this thread is that lots of insulation will fix that. I suspect not. The LTE in use down at 2.8 e-10 according to its output. I have put it in a small cardboard box

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Yup, that’s another good reason for the plastic bag :) If moisture might be an issue in your area, cover up the corner for a while in the rainy season to check for that problem before the project begins. Depending on the bag is not a real good idea. Bob On Nov 23, 2014, at 9:50 AM,

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Poul-Henning wrote: Charles' design works great from the outside, but doesn't do anything with respect to the thermal energy expended by the encapsulated device themselves, which will cause convection in the inner box. I have been using the technique for 30+ years, including with many OCXOs

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Tom Van Baak
The short-term performance is 10x worse if you don't shield the TCXO from air, even if the ambient air is still. I suggested Said sell the product with some sort of engineered shield in place. Instead each of us will solve the problem in our own way; which is ok for a dev kit. For plots and

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 23 Nov 2014 14:45, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote: Hi If you have a basement in your house / building I do not. —and — it’s dry and reasonably draft free (no garage doors opening up from time to time) My lab is a room which is part of the garage! Just about everything is against me with

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message canx10hb0kdrnaayzgvm1gkduj7gklth0acdxczg894hxbus...@mail.gmail.com , Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) writes: He installs ground source heat pumps for the geothermal energy. He says that they actually work quite poorly in many cases. There is a BIG difference between

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 23 Nov 2014 17:49, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: In message canx10hb0kdrnaayzgvm1gkduj7gklth0acdxczg894hxbus...@mail.gmail.com , Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) writes: He installs ground source heat pumps for the geothermal energy. He says that they

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message canx10hcaob-5gysbr7sdxwl7dyh7qubmhxwmi9xdrcf3mdm...@mail.gmail.com , Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) writes: Geothermal means you drill at least 50m (Iceland) or more likely half a kilometer down, in order to harvest water at near boiling point from the Earths

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Alexander Pummer
Schomandl -- the company which made the first indirect synthesizers in the sixties in the past century -- used buried crystal oscillators as standard frequency source, 12meter deep in the companies yard in the Belfort Strasse in Munich, Bavaria Germany, ...Rohde Schwarz also had buried

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Jim Sanford
I've read about die-hard microwave hams burying their master oscillators for a long time . . . . On 11/23/2014 11:46 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: On 23 Nov 2014 14:45, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote: Hi If you have a basement in your house / building I do not. —and —

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Jim Sanford
Interesting comment about the geothermal. I have to take continuing education courses in order to maintain my PE; one was in geothermal. Intuitively, great for cooling, even (especially!) in Florida. Intuitively, not so hot for heating, especially in PA, and especially with the price of

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Dave Martindale
Did you use one-ply, two-ply, or three-ply TP? More seriously, your LTE-Lite differs in a couple of respects from the batch of production ones, or at least my example. Your TCXO seems to be in a metal package (shiny gold colour) and open to the air, if I'm interpreting the photo on your LTE-Lite

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Jim Sanford
All: I appreciate all the responses to my post earlier today. Very informative. First: DownEast Microwave sells a nice kit for distributing 10 MHz. Specs are on their website, but basically, one in, four out -- each individually buffered and filtered. Second: I will use the 20 MHz from

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread S. Jackson via time-nuts
Hi guys, this is the kind of lively discussion I was hoping for! I enjoyed this. Some comments (these are my opinions only): * Thanks much for Tom publishing the plots, and spending a lot(!) of time evaluating and helping improve the units significantly. Tom's unit was a pre-production

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If your target frequency error is in the 1x10^-10 to the “hopefully 1x10^-11” range, You should consider your very requirements carefully. I tossed up some frequency plots of the KS boxes and of the Z3801 a while back. They are OCXO based boxes running in a very good thermal environment.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 23 Nov 2014 16:25, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote: For plots and photos showing performance with, and without, and with insulation see: http://leapsecond.com/pages/LTE-Lite/ The difference is dramatic, especially if you are used to working with OCXO where this sort of effect does not

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Well the answer is obvious:) You simply need to turn on the air-conditioning full blast for more months of the summer in … ummm ….. e …. Denmark … hmmm….. Heat only or cool only systems seem to be more practical when the heat sink is a flowing body of water or an ocean. Unfortunately

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi There are two plots with activity changing at 300 seconds. The second plot (purple) is the removal of the paper at 300 seconds. The fourth plot (red) is the addition of the paper at 300 seconds. The last plot (green and blue) is ADEV with and without the paper. Blue is ADEV with paper.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Tom, From the looks of the plots these may be from the first proto unit with early software no? Also was this with the indoor GPS antenna setup? The production units with outdoor or windowed' antenna should have significantly improved average performance from the first unit and its early GPS

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A lot of these parts are designed for use in a system environment rather than sitting out on a bench. That’s as true of the KS boxes (forced air cooling) as it is of the LTE’s. In 90% (and likely 99.9%) of the places a TCXO gets used, it’s packed tight in with a bunch of other stuff. Not

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Actually that was Bob trying to explain Tom’s plots simply from looking at them. I *think* I got it right, but it’s Tom’s data and his LTE part. Others have commented that Tom’s part looks different than theirs. Maybe Tom needs a Microsoft Windows Update on his GPSDO firmware :) For some

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Alex Pummer
by us in central California, we get 1kW/h square meter average around the year, the south even more, el Cajon will have today +29C° in the afternoon as of 23 of November 2014 73 Alex On 11/23/2014 9:49 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Neville Michie
A Hint about avoiding convective cell heat transfer, If you keep the spacing between two planes less than 5/16 then you will be unlikely to have convection cells forming. The stationary air is a good insulator but thermal radiation will be the dominant heat transfer process. This is true for

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I believe that if you go back a few years in the archives, you will find a thread that ultimately stops with a swimming pool full of mercury. Needless to say, we’re been down this road once or twice before. Bob On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Neville Michie namic...@gmail.com wrote: A

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Said wrote: The 10MHz units have a different RF output than the 20MHz units. The 20MHz units have a 50 Ohms series-terminated and buffered RF output, while the 10MHz units have the TCXO output drive the MMCX connector directly without series impedance matching. Both drive the line with 3.0V

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Jim: It turns out that ground water that's being pumped is very similar to pumping oil. It's a limited resource. There's a web page showing the GRACE satellite maps of California and that we are running out of ground water. This isn't the page, but gives the idea:

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Jim Lux
On 11/23/14, 5:46 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi Jim: It turns out that ground water that's being pumped is very similar to pumping oil. It's a limited resource. There's a web page showing the GRACE satellite maps of California and that we are running out of ground water. Back east where that

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Said Jackson via time-nuts
Charles, Any buffer options added to the board would have caused either additive phase noise or added power consumption, and possibly yet another low noise LDO to be required. On the 20MHz units there is already a strong buffer that can drive 50 Ohms terminations so adding a buffer in front

Re: [time-nuts] Practical considerations making a lab standard with an LTE lite

2014-11-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 54723237.7070...@pcscons.com, Alex Pummer writes: by us in central California, we get 1kW/h square meter average around the year, the south even more, el Cajon will have today +29C° in the afternoon as of 23 of November 2014 Yes, the latitude means a lot for ground