-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of
jmfra...@cox.net
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:31 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Problems with CHU voice announcements
I do not know if anyone else noticed, but since sometime
Bob Camp wrote:
> Once upon a time it was done with a mechanical marvel of a device.
And before those electromechanical contraptions, there was this :):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaking_clock#/media/File:1937TimeVoice.jpg
-Ruslan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Bob Camp
The voice announcement problem appeared to be fixed around 17:45 P.M.
John WA4WDL
jmfra...@cox.net wrote:
> I do not know if anyone else noticed, but since sometime before 17:00 UTC,
> the
> voice announcements on the 7.850 MHz signal have been messed up. Some times
> the
Hi John, thanks for reporting this problem. One of my colleagues is
heading out to CHU to look into it right now.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:52 PM, wrote:
> I meant to type 7.850 MHz, re-engaged brain.
>
> John WA4WDL
>
> jmfra...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > I do not know
Hi
Not quite sure what happened to the original message before it got here …
The voice / time announcements on WWV and CHU date back quite a ways. I wonder
just
how old the gear they currently are using is? Once upon a time it was done with
a
mechanical marvel of a device.
Bob
> On Feb
I do not know if anyone else noticed, but since sometime before 17:00 UTC, the
voice announcements on the 7.850 MHz signal have been messed up. Some times
the announcements are missing, other times they are incorrect. I have not
checked the other
frequencies. I was working in my shop and
I meant to type 7.850 MHz, re-engaged brain.
John WA4WDL
jmfra...@cox.net wrote:
>
> I do not know if anyone has noticed, but since sometime before 17:00 UTC, the
> voice announcements on the 7.8350 kHz signal have been messed up. Some times
> they are missing, other times they are