From Page 5:
The need to offer legacy LORAN-C system capabilityt for legacy LORAN-C is
not required in the US and
Does anybody who heard the test signal know for certain that the
modulation was that being proposed? Perhaps they were just testing a new
transmitter with the old modulation?
It
In message 52350.12.6.201.2.1354382552.squir...@popaccts.quikus.com, J. Fors
ter writes:
It looks to me like this is another new format, requiring the purchase of
new receivers from a sole source supplier who has probably got the whole
thing wrapped up in patents... hence another
On 12/01/2012 06:34 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message52350.12.6.201.2.1354382552.squir...@popaccts.quikus.com, J. Fors
ter writes:
It looks to me like this is another new format, requiring the purchase of
new receivers from a sole source supplier who has probably got the whole
John
I can only say that the austrons had no problem copying the signal and
locking.
I know that eloran in europe was going to main compatibility with the old
systems.
So no way to know if it was a different transmitter or much of anything
else.
Regards
Paul
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:22 PM, J.
