Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-09 Thread Chris Howard

My perpetually drifting 10811 pretty quickly made it to the negative
voltage rail on the control voltage.

I was looking at the oscillator output with an O-scope and it looked
pretty nasty.  My equipment is not so hot, so I first chalked that
up to bad probes.  But I did some google work on that and found an
old time-nuts message thread about the 10811 looking bad if the
output impedance is bad.

The VE2ZAZ board has provision for a 50 ohm resistor on the oscillator
output.  I have one on the board but it is a little-bitty thing,
maybe 1/8th of a watt?  Something I probably got from the guts of a VCR
or whatnot.  Hmm.  So I put in a 1/4 watt 50 ohm resistor (like
the parts list called for).  My working hypothesis is that the small
resistor was changing impedance due to heat.

I have reset the control voltage to center value and got the coarse
trimmer all beautifully centered.  It's been running for about a day
and I am hopeful that I've made a difference.  So far so good.

While I was interrupting the flow of 10 Mhz, I also mapped out the
control voltage and corresponding digital control value and an
approximate frequency.

You EE guys are probably snickering and will want to
tear the epaulettes off my time-nuts coat and break my sword.
What can I say.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-09 Thread Azelio Boriani
Unfortunately, experience is a lantern lighting the way already done... and
it takes months to forge a good sword: no one should break any sword.

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Chris Howard ch...@elfpen.com wrote:


 My perpetually drifting 10811 pretty quickly made it to the negative
 voltage rail on the control voltage.

 I was looking at the oscillator output with an O-scope and it looked
 pretty nasty.  My equipment is not so hot, so I first chalked that
 up to bad probes.  But I did some google work on that and found an
 old time-nuts message thread about the 10811 looking bad if the
 output impedance is bad.

 The VE2ZAZ board has provision for a 50 ohm resistor on the oscillator
 output.  I have one on the board but it is a little-bitty thing,
 maybe 1/8th of a watt?  Something I probably got from the guts of a VCR
 or whatnot.  Hmm.  So I put in a 1/4 watt 50 ohm resistor (like
 the parts list called for).  My working hypothesis is that the small
 resistor was changing impedance due to heat.

 I have reset the control voltage to center value and got the coarse
 trimmer all beautifully centered.  It's been running for about a day
 and I am hopeful that I've made a difference.  So far so good.

 While I was interrupting the flow of 10 Mhz, I also mapped out the
 control voltage and corresponding digital control value and an
 approximate frequency.

 You EE guys are probably snickering and will want to
 tear the epaulettes off my time-nuts coat and break my sword.
 What can I say.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-09 Thread WarrenS

Chris

HP 10811 can't drift that much that fast unless something is near broken, or 
being connected wrong like gnds or PS voltage.
Check the operation of the oven. It must be close and sort of working 
otherwise it would not be on freq as close as it is, but maybe it is 
drifting.
The other thing to check is what it is being compared to.  Are you sure it 
is the 10811 drifting and not your comparison reference?
Also Triple check to make sure the input to the EFC is not causing a problem 
the way you are using it by

grounding the EFC and count the cycle time for a beat freq.
If the freq is close to your reference, Adjust the 10811 to get a beat freq 
between the two 10 MHz signals or use a scope and Sync on the reference osc 
and time the drift rate of the 10811 osc a few times a day to see if the 
drift rate is changing.
A position change on the scope of 1ns /sec = 1e-9 freq offset,   1ns /10 sec 
is 1e-10, etc.


If all you have for comparison is a 1 pps from an unknown if working GPS's 
1pps, then sounds like it is time to get something else to break the tie to 
see which is really broken.
With the high freq drift rate of  1Hz that you are seeing,  you could use 
a wwv receiver.


ws

*
[time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)
Chris Howard
Fri Nov 9 21:53:39 UTC 2012

My perpetually drifting 10811 pretty quickly made it to the negative
voltage rail on the control voltage.

I was looking at the oscillator output with an O-scope and it looked
pretty nasty.  My equipment is not so hot, so I first chalked that
up to bad probes.  But I did some google work on that and found an
old time-nuts message thread about the 10811 looking bad if the
output impedance is bad.

The VE2ZAZ board has provision for a 50 ohm resistor on the oscillator
output.  I have one on the board but it is a little-bitty thing,
maybe 1/8th of a watt?  Something I probably got from the guts of a VCR
or whatnot.  Hmm.  So I put in a 1/4 watt 50 ohm resistor (like
the parts list called for).  My working hypothesis is that the small
resistor was changing impedance due to heat.

I have reset the control voltage to center value and got the coarse
trimmer all beautifully centered.  It's been running for about a day
and I am hopeful that I've made a difference.  So far so good.

While I was interrupting the flow of 10 Mhz, I also mapped out the
control voltage and corresponding digital control value and an
approximate frequency.

You EE guys are probably snickering and will want to
tear the epaulettes off my time-nuts coat and break my sword.
What can I say. 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-05 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you have one of the 10811's out of a Z3801, then it's EFC range is ~ 10X
a normal part. There apparently are other odd EFC ranges out there.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Howard
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 4:53 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift
(beginner-ishquestion)




On 11/5/2012 3:16 PM, Richard H McCorkle wrote:

The EFC specs on a 10811 are a frequency change of  1 Hz over
 a -5v to +5v EFC span or a sensitivity of roughly 1e-8 per volt
 (varies widely up to about 3e-8 / volt on some units) so you can
 get a ballpark idea of the age rate by looking at the EFC voltage
 change over 24-hour periods.

I have been running it continuously for quite a while.  I fired it up
from cold start early this year and have had it running almost 
continuously, just a few power cycles in that time.

Over the period of three weeks ending today the control
voltage has move approximately 1 volt.

That fits within your 0.05 volts per day.

Thanks to everyone. Lots of interesting and helpful information.

Chris Howard





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-05 Thread Rick Karlquist
Bob Camp wrote:
 Hi

 If you have one of the 10811's out of a Z3801, then it's EFC range is ~
 10X
 a normal part. There apparently are other odd EFC ranges out there.

 Bob


For example, the 5071A cesium standard has 10X range (modified 10811).
I guess in the 5061 you just had to tweak the mechanical trimmer
occasionally if the xtal osc drifted out of range.  With all the
other maintenance on the '61, this didn't seem like much of an
additional burden.

We wanted to make the 5071A automatic and convinced ourselves we
could get away with increasing the EFC range.  There were two issues
with this:  one was the possible lower Q of a hyperabrupt varactor.
We determined that there was nothing risky about hyperabrupt diodes.
The other issue was contamination due to either the 10811's internal
Zener reference or the external DAC.  The Zener reference diode,
according to the designers, is a low noise Zener (I don't know
if it is the buried type), but anyway, it is a legacy part,
but a known good legacy part.  The 5071A DAC was a very carefully
designed one that was good enough.

Rick Karlquist N6RK


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] getting a grip on 10811 drift (beginner-ishquestion)

2012-11-05 Thread EWKehren
  
I have three 5071  10811's all have below 1 E-12  AV from 1 to  100 seconds.
Bert Kehren
 
 
In a message dated 11/5/2012 7:07:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
rich...@karlquist.com writes:

Bob Camp  wrote:
 Hi

 If you have one of the 10811's out of a  Z3801, then it's EFC range is ~
 10X
 a normal part. There  apparently are other odd EFC ranges out there.

  Bob


For example, the 5071A cesium standard has 10X range  (modified 10811).
I guess in the 5061 you just had to tweak the mechanical  trimmer
occasionally if the xtal osc drifted out of range.  With all  the
other maintenance on the '61, this didn't seem like much of  an
additional burden.

We wanted to make the 5071A automatic and  convinced ourselves we
could get away with increasing the EFC range.   There were two issues
with this:  one was the possible lower Q of a  hyperabrupt varactor.
We determined that there was nothing risky about  hyperabrupt diodes.
The other issue was contamination due to either the  10811's internal
Zener reference or the external DAC.  The Zener  reference diode,
according to the designers, is a low noise Zener (I  don't know
if it is the buried type), but anyway, it is a legacy  part,
but a known good legacy part.  The 5071A DAC was a very  carefully
designed one that was good enough.

Rick Karlquist  N6RK


___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions  there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.