I like to use mongoose
http://code.google.com/p/mongoose/
The project page says 50Kb executable, although it balooned up to 63K the
last time I built it.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a
On 2/11/13 10:20 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, David J Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Anything which works on the Raspberry Pi must be fairly lightweight! G I
don't think that basic Apache would be too much to manage, and many folk
have used it:
] lightweight webserver for, e.g., NTP widget
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a management/user interface to test equipment or appliances
(e.g. like the NTP server recently discussed, or a box with mixers and
counters).
I've built some web interfaces to very
I tend to agree with this notion of not going with the cheapest SBC
possible. Unless you are going to incorporate the PI in a number of
devices (i.e. will be buying multiple units), it makes more sense to
toss in the extra hundred dollars and get a more capable SBC. For one
thing, you need the
time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 4:02 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] lightweight webserver for, e.g., NTP widget
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a management/user interface to test equipment or appliances
(e.g. like
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] lightweight webserver for, e.g., NTP widget
If you decide to go with one of the SBCs at embeddedarm.com, I have a Wiki page
on my web site documenting how I have set mine up.
Didier
Www.ko4bb.com
Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker
Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker.
-Original Message-
From: li...@lazygranch.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] lightweight webserver for, e.g., NTP widget
I think those SBCs have
On 2/12/13 10:11 AM, Didier Juges wrote:
Before you know it, you are going to find that not having php (or Python, or
Perl, or whatever your favorite scripting language is) is crippling. I
recommend you bite the bullet and get a small ARM SBC big enough to run a full
Linux distro. I use a
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a management/user interface to test equipment or appliances
(e.g. like the NTP server recently discussed, or a box with mixers and
counters).
I've built some web interfaces to very small things using Arduinos and
There are numberous web servers that are small and light weight, some
examples are boa ( www.boa.org ) and HTTPd
http://www.nongnu.org/mini-httpd/
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 14:01 -0800, Jim Lux wrote:
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a management/user
If you just want to static-serve the assets in a particular folder, and have
python available, there's always:
python -m SimpleHTTPServer
…which serves the current directory on localhost:8080. But no PHP.
For a modern approach you might look at building a small server based on
I used thttpd many years ago. It is tiny and fast. There are others.
Joe Gray
W5JG
On Feb 11, 2013 3:01 PM, Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'm intrigued by the possibility of using a lightweight web server to
provide a management/user interface to test equipment or appliances (e.g.
like
From: Jim Lux
[]
Is there something that runs under Linux on a lightweight single board
PC (Raspberry pi or Intel Mini-ITX Atom mobos) that isn't too much of a
pain, and doesn't require you to be a full time web server administrator
to make it work?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:04 PM, David J Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Anything which works on the Raspberry Pi must be fairly lightweight! G I
don't think that basic Apache would be too much to manage, and many folk
have used it:
I have to agree with the above. Many people
14 matches
Mail list logo
