Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 117, Issue 61

Hi, On 04/18/2014 03:17 PM, HagaaarTheHorrible wrote: Hi Dave and thanks for the quick answer! My thesis is about a phase noise measurement device I developed, which primary use is to measure phase noise/jitter of audioband DACs. I probably won't be focussing on jitter too much but would like

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 117, Issue 61

t results? /tvb - Original Message - From: "Bob Camp" To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 7:12 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 117, Issue 61 Hi The dividing line between wander and jitter is a “legal&q

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 117, Issue 61

Hi The dividing line between wander and jitter is a “legal" one rather than a physics one. It’s a breakpoint in a spec where the treatment of the noise changes from “do this” to “do that”. In most cases you pass wander and you attenuate jitter. Different specs put the line at different points b

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 117, Issue 61

Hi Dave and thanks for the quick answer! My thesis is about a phase noise measurement device I developed, which primary use is to measure phase noise/jitter of audioband DACs. I probably won't be focussing on jitter too much but would like to know if there even is one accepted standard definitio