Moin,
I just stumpled upon [1] which is a nice review paper of optical
atomic clocks. It isn't an introductory paper, but one that focuses
on the general build-up and the problems that arise.
[1] "Optical atomic clocks", by Ludlow, Boyd and Ye, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.637
http
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:18:04 -0400
Demetrios Matsakis via time-nuts wrote:
> Responding to the second quote, at least until I retired last year, the BIPM
> will allow any laboratory to contribute to UTC and realize UTC so long as
> the national signatory requests it.
If someone here feels adve
I have cut two quotes from this posting, which I would like to comment on.
One is this:
>
>
> Btw.: The GPS system delivers an? in-official uncertainty, because the
> D.O.D. clock is not participating in the S.I. representation of the UTC.
>
and the other is this:
"This is not true. While B
Tom,
Have you ever tested the HP106B for phase noise? And in particular between
the HP106B and the BVA 8600 which is the best from this point of view?
Luciano
Luciano P. S. Paramithiotti
tim...@timeok.it
www.timeok.it
Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-boun...@lists.febo.com
A
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 14:24:48 +0100
Frank Stellmach wrote:
> you're welcome to pose any questions here.
Definitely! We all started as beginners and learned through asking questions.
> Concerning your question, there are basically two different parameters
> called 'stability' and 'uncertainty'.
