[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq via time-nuts
Hi Lower turning point has been done, both with AT’s (back in ~ the 1950’s) and with SC’s. Neither one showed any significant benefit. Taking a crystal down to sub 20K sort of temps does ramp up the Q. The gotcha is that the frequency vs temp curve is so steep that very minor temperature

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann via time-nuts
Am 2022-06-08 21:53, schrieb Tom Van Baak: Would it be advantageous, then, to run a high-performance laboratory oscillator at its lower turnover point? Or at -78 C (CO2) or 77 K (liquid Nitrogen)? I have no idea about the crystal itself. Maybe Bernd or the SC (SantaClara) veterans can help?

[time-nuts] Re: Home Brew GSPDO

2022-06-08 Thread Chris Caudle via time-nuts
On Wed, June 8, 2022 12:59 pm, paul swed via time-nuts wrote: > Well the easiest thing is to use two level comparators on the filtered DC. > One for high and the other for the low trip point. That only tells you if the PLL is locked to the PPS output, it does not tell you if the PPS output is

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq via time-nuts
Hi I would be careful with that paper since part of what it says is not (in general) correct. Bob > On Jun 8, 2022, at 1:22 PM, Ross P via time-nuts > wrote: > > Hi,Thank you very much, this paper answered some questions. > >On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 12:38:04 PM PDT, Hans-Georg

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Ross P via time-nuts
Hi,Thank you very much, this paper answered some questions. On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 12:38:04 PM PDT, Hans-Georg Lehnard via time-nuts wrote: Hi, read this paper from Connor-Winfield about differences AT/SC cuts. http://www.conwin.com/pdfs/at_or_sc_for_ocxo.pdf Am

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq via time-nuts
Hi Well ….. You can bash both AT’s and SC’s a *lot* harder than you might think. Both will suffer quite a bit in terms of ADEV when you do. Since the AT likely has a lower resistance (by quite a bit) than the SC, the loop current ( and thus the drive into the buffer) may not be as far

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq via time-nuts
Hi The stability depends on a long list of things. Since you can get higher Q with an AT than you can with an SC, if Q was all that mattered, the AT would be the king of the hill. The oscillator circuit matters, but different parts of it matter in different ways. The things you might do for

[time-nuts] Re: Home Brew GSPDO

2022-06-08 Thread W Private via time-nuts
That particular approach about monitoring the control voltage may have to wait until I get the thing all buttoned up and insulated because the control voltage changes even with the temp in the room. The oven is insulated, but apparently not perfectly. I did put the heatsink for voltage control

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Magnus Danielson via time-nuts
Hi Gerhard, On 2022-06-08 20:42, g...@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de wrote: Am 2022-06-08 13:27, schrieb Magnus Danielson via time-nuts: As far as I remember and know, you can achieve about the same phase-noise properties as you hit about the same bandwidth from the Q, and noise contribution is

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Hans-Georg Lehnard via time-nuts
Hi, read this paper from Connor-Winfield about differences AT/SC cuts. http://www.conwin.com/pdfs/at_or_sc_for_ocxo.pdf Am 2022-06-08 04:04, schrieb Ross P via time-nuts: > Hello,My first post.I have created a 64-bit frequency counter, 15.9 digits > after converting to floating point. >

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann via time-nuts
Am 2022-06-08 13:27, schrieb Magnus Danielson via time-nuts: As far as I remember and know, you can achieve about the same phase-noise properties as you hit about the same bandwidth from the Q, and noise contribution is about the same. So, it boils down to do the supporting amplifier well.

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Ross P via time-nuts
Hi,So, highest short term stability depends on the Q of the crystal and quality of the feedback circuit. In that case, an AT-cut with a low noise feedback amplifier will be as good as an SC-cut with the same amp. Does pulling the oscillator affect the short term walk?rp On Wednesday, June

[time-nuts] Re: Home Brew GSPDO

2022-06-08 Thread paul swed via time-nuts
Congratulations on the fun project. Well the easiest thing is to use two level comparators on the filtered DC. One for high and the other for the low trip point. Then feed a LED or a set reset flip flop so you have a memory. Unlocks are a challenge in that everything may work just fine but then a

[time-nuts] Home Brew GSPDO

2022-06-08 Thread W Private via time-nuts
Hello all, Thanks for letting me join. I just built a GPSDO from some junk I had lying aroundI used a Navman GPS Jupiter 12 and an Isotemp 118-12 which can be controlled by the NavmanThe Isotemp is controlled by the heater in it which can be controlled by external DC signal. The Navman puts out

[time-nuts] Re: Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

2022-06-08 Thread Magnus Danielson via time-nuts
Hi, I agree in general. However, I do see that other work to get good resulst have been done when SC-cut is considered, so rather than SC-cut as a cut is better, it becomes somewhat of a tell-tale of that other work being done properly. I.e. it is meaningless to take the step to SC-cut when