On 12/14/21 5:23 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
Out of curiosity, since you monitor NIST Gaithersburg, if you were to average
over the offsets for a whole month, what kind of value would you get? Surely
it is close to zero but I am curious how close. Within 1ms?
It depends. Mostly on the routing
On 7/3/20 8:56 AM, Andrew Hancock wrote:
GPS 3D fix is fine, using an outside aerial, there are no issues here reported
with cgps -s or gpsmon, but recently I've racked mounted all my PIs in a
network rack.
Have you ruled out thermal issues with the Pi being in a rack?
You may want to look at something an Endrun CDMA ntpserver for the
datacenter; don't need view of the sky. Available on the used market sub $1k
Standard solution for this scenario.
K5ROE Mike
On 7/22/19 10:50 AM, wildylion via time-nuts wrote:
Yeah, of course I will NOT do anything home
If the data collected by your system could potentially be used in
litigation , I would reconsider your accuracy requirement, especially
the OKness of simultaneous transactions.
I assume that all nodes can write to the blockchain; how do you sanity
check if one node's clock is wildly off?
from one of the above that lowers
priority for ports > 1024
It could be weirdness from the network stack on your Windows XP clients.
You might considering using something more modern.
K5ROE Mike
On 5/26/19 4:26 AM, Peter Martinez via time-nuts wrote:
Greetings, Time Nuts, from a new mem
