On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:16 PM jimlux wrote:
> AJ is a slightly different problem than straight up beamforming
>
> You need N+1 receivers to suppress N point source jammers - it's more of
> an adaptive canceller than a beamformer.
One nice property of AJ though is that the nulls it forms can be
On 8/31/18 9:38 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM Attila Kinali wrote:
"Just DSP work" is a tad bit more than you think. You are dealing
with sevaral 1Msps of data, even for a simple L1 C/A receiver.
If you are going multi-band-multi-GNSS you are usually in the 50MHz BW
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM Attila Kinali wrote:
> "Just DSP work" is a tad bit more than you think. You are dealing
> with sevaral 1Msps of data, even for a simple L1 C/A receiver.
> If you are going multi-band-multi-GNSS you are usually in the 50MHz BW
> at L1 and 80MHz BW at L2/L5 range, wh
I/We track down things that jam weather radars. Mostly WiFi access points
misconfigured.
Which share many of the characteristics of GPS jammers
1 - small low powered
2 - one can ruin a pilots entire day
3 - distributed
4 - can literally be anywhere
Stuff like this is why FCC blocked anyone
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:05:48 +
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Seeing some open source software implementing beam-forming was one of
> the things I hoped to see result from the open hardware multi-band
> GNSS receivers like the GNSS firehose project (
> http://pmonta.com/blog/2017/05/05/gnss-fireho
